Suppr超能文献

使用反射仪系统在全科医疗中筛查糖尿病。伊斯林顿糖尿病调查。

Screening for diabetes mellitus in general practice using a reflectance meter system. The Islington Diabetes Survey.

作者信息

Forrest R D, Jackson C A, Yudkin J S

机构信息

Academic Unit of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Whittington Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Res. 1987 Nov;6(3):119-22.

PMID:3436112
Abstract

The feasibility of using a blood-glucose reflectance meter to identify subjects with abnormal glucose tolerance in a community-based screening programme for diabetes mellitus has been assessed. 530 (51.0%) of 1,040 screened subjects had a finger-prick capillary blood-glucose level estimated 2 h after a 75 g oral glucose load. Blood-glucose estimations were performed on this sample by an automated glucose-oxidase method and by a reflectance meter system (Reflocheck, BCL (London) Ltd., Lewes, East Sussex, UK). Blood-glucose values measured by the meter were found to be higher than those assayed by the glucose-oxidase method by a mean ratio of 1.16:1. This overestimation could not wholly be explained by the meter being calibrated to measure plasma- rather than whole blood-glucose. This ratio was constant in specimens assayed by the glucose-oxidase method within 24 h of sampling or within 7 days of sampling. The meter system gave a good approximation of the prevalence of DM in the sample (14 "diabetics" identified by the meter, 15 by the glucose-oxidase 2hBG). The optimal test characteristics of the meter 2hBG as a screening test for DM were at a cut-off level of 9.7 mmol/l (sensitivity and specificity 98.4%, CI 85.8-100%, for sensitivity, 97.3-99.5% for specificity). However, in order to be 100% sensitive for DM, confirmatory GTTs would be necessary on all subjects with meter 2hBG greater than 9.5 mmol/l, providing a specificity of 98.2% (CI 97.0-99.7%). The unit cost of detecting 1 case of DM using a single meter became cheaper than using the laboratory glucose-oxidase method when 143 subjects had been screened.

摘要

在一项基于社区的糖尿病筛查项目中,已对使用血糖仪识别糖耐量异常受试者的可行性进行了评估。在1040名接受筛查的受试者中,有530名(51.0%)在口服75克葡萄糖负荷后2小时进行了指尖毛细血管血糖水平测定。通过自动葡萄糖氧化酶法和反射仪系统(Reflocheck,BCL(伦敦)有限公司,英国东萨塞克斯郡刘易斯)对该样本进行血糖测定。发现血糖仪测得的血糖值比葡萄糖氧化酶法测得的值平均高1.16:1。这种高估不能完全用血糖仪校准用于测量血浆而非全血葡萄糖来解释。该比值在采样后24小时内或采样后7天内用葡萄糖氧化酶法测定的标本中是恒定的。该血糖仪系统对样本中糖尿病的患病率给出了较好的近似值(血糖仪识别出14名“糖尿病患者”,葡萄糖氧化酶法2小时血糖识别出15名)。血糖仪2小时血糖作为糖尿病筛查试验的最佳检测特征是截断水平为9.7毫摩尔/升(敏感性和特异性为98.4%,敏感性的可信区间为85.8 - 100%,特异性为97.3 - 99.5%)。然而,为了对糖尿病有100%的敏感性,对于所有血糖仪2小时血糖大于9.5毫摩尔/升的受试者都需要进行确诊性葡萄糖耐量试验,此时特异性为98.2%(可信区间为97.0 - 99.7%)。当筛查了143名受试者时,使用单个血糖仪检测1例糖尿病的单位成本比使用实验室葡萄糖氧化酶法更便宜

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验