Keyter Andrea, Salek Sam, Danks Lorraine, Nkambule Portia, Semete-Makokotlela Boitumelo, Walker Stuart
Department of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jul 23;12:699063. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.699063. eCollection 2021.
The aims of this study were to compare the overall regulatory review timelines achieved by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) in 2020 to the timelines historically achieved by the Medicines Control Council (MCC). This study also aimed to evaluate the regulatory review processes and the good review practices that have been implemented by SAHPRA to support the assessment of new chemical entities and generic product applications for market authorization in the business-as-usual and backlog process streams. A questionnaire was completed and verified by SAHPRA to describe the structure of the organization, the resources available, the process for regulatory review of new chemical entities and generic products and the level of implementation of good review practices and regulatory decision-making practices for market authorization. Data were collected and analyzed on the overall approval timelines for new chemical entities and generic products registered by SAHPRA in 2020 in the business-as-usual and backlog process streams. A full, independent scientific review was conducted for all new chemical entities and generic product applications in the business-as-usual stream. Facilitated regulatory pathways were introduced for the review of new chemical entities and generic products in the backlog stream. As a result, the timelines for approval of applications in the backlog stream were 68% quicker for both new chemical entities and generics, using facilitated regulatory pathways, such as abridged and verification review models. The comparisons made through this study provided insight into the improvements that have been made through the establishment of SAHPRA and the transition in 2018 from the MCC. The re-engineered processes that have been developed and implemented by SAHPRA to address the backlog in the review of the applications for market authorization have demonstrated a decrease in the overall median approval times. The expansion of these processes into the routine review of medical products will contribute to the enhanced regulatory performance of SAHPRA and patients' access to new medicines.
本研究的目的是将南非卫生产品监管局(SAHPRA)在2020年实现的整体监管审查时间表与药品控制委员会(MCC)过去实现的时间表进行比较。本研究还旨在评估SAHPRA实施的监管审查流程以及良好审查实践,以支持在正常业务流程和积压流程中对新化学实体和仿制药产品上市授权申请的评估。SAHPRA完成并核实了一份调查问卷,以描述该组织的结构、可用资源、新化学实体和仿制药的监管审查流程,以及良好审查实践和上市授权监管决策实践的实施水平。收集并分析了SAHPRA在2020年正常业务流程和积压流程中注册的新化学实体和仿制药产品的总体批准时间表数据。对正常业务流程中的所有新化学实体和仿制药产品申请进行了全面、独立的科学审查。为积压流程中的新化学实体和仿制药产品审查引入了便利的监管途径。结果,使用简化和核实审查模型等便利的监管途径,积压流程中申请的批准时间表对于新化学实体和仿制药均加快了68%。通过本研究进行的比较深入了解了通过设立SAHPRA以及2018年从MCC过渡所取得的改进。SAHPRA为解决上市授权申请审查积压问题而开发和实施的重新设计流程已表明总体中位批准时间有所减少。将这些流程扩展到医疗产品的常规审查将有助于提高SAHPRA的监管绩效以及患者获得新药的机会。