• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

东非共同体成员国对联合评估程序有效性和效率的评估:前进之路

Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the East African Community Joint Assessment Procedure by Member Countries: The Way Forward.

作者信息

Ngum Nancy, Mashingia Jane, Ndomondo-Sigonda Margareth, Walker Stuart, Salek Sam

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.

African Union Development Agency, New Partnership for Africa's Development (AUDA-NEPAD), Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 5;13:891506. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.891506. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2022.891506
PMID:35865962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9294367/
Abstract

For almost a decade, the East African Community has implemented the Medicines Regulatory Harmonization (EAC-MRH) programme among its member states to harmonise technical requirements and standards for medical products regulation, jointly conduct scientific review of medical product dossiers to assess safety, efficacy and quality, inspect pharmaceutical manufacturing sites and streamline decision-making processes. This initiative enables the cost-effective use of limited resources and efficient and effective delivery of regulatory services to be determined, thus instilling transparency and accountability in all stakeholders, optimising the pharmaceutical market and economic development and improving access to safe, high-quality, effective medicines in the region. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the current operating model of the EAC-MRH initiative, including challenges faced and to identify opportunities for improvement. The Process Effectiveness and Efficiency Rating (PEER) questionnaire, which was used to identify the benefits, challenges, and suggestions for improving performance of EAC-MRH initiative, was completed by assessors representing seven EAC authorities in the joint assessment procedure. Semi-structured interviews were also carried out to validate the responses. This initiative has been of considerable value as it moves toward achieving its main objectives of shorter timelines for approval of medicines, information sharing among regulators and capacity building for assessments, resulting in quicker access and increased availability of medicines for patients in the region. However, the key challenges identified that have hindered effectiveness and efficiency were the lack of a centralised submission and tracking system; inadequate human resources, manufacturers' failure to submit the exact same dossier to all countries of interest; lack of an integrated information management system; lack of information on national medical regulatory authority or EAC websites; and challenges in monitoring and tracking assessment reports. The use of a robust information technology system for the central tracking of EAC products is essential to address the identified challenges and improve regulatory effectiveness and efficiency. One central point for payment is needed to expedite the process and to ensure transparency and the availability of information on decision making on national and regional websites. Other key strategies for enhancement include improving the capacity of assessors, work and information sharing and a coordination mechanism for the regional joint assessment, with the eventual establishment of a regional medicine agency.

摘要

近十年来,东非共同体在其成员国中实施了药品监管协调(EAC-MRH)计划,以协调医疗产品监管的技术要求和标准,联合对医疗产品档案进行科学审查,以评估安全性、有效性和质量,检查药品生产场地并简化决策流程。该举措能够确定有限资源的成本效益利用方式以及监管服务的高效交付方式,从而在所有利益相关者中树立透明度和问责制,优化药品市场和经济发展,并改善该地区安全、高质量、有效药品的可及性。本研究的目的是评估EAC-MRH计划当前运营模式的有效性和效率,包括所面临的挑战,并确定改进机会。在联合评估程序中,代表东非共同体七个机构的评估人员完成了用于确定EAC-MRH计划绩效的益处、挑战和改进建议的过程有效性和效率评级(PEER)问卷。还进行了半结构化访谈以验证答复。该计划具有相当大的价值,因为它朝着实现其主要目标迈进,即缩短药品批准时间、监管机构之间共享信息以及进行评估能力建设,从而使该地区的患者能够更快获得药品且药品供应增加。然而,已确定的阻碍有效性和效率的关键挑战包括缺乏集中提交和跟踪系统;人力资源不足;制造商未向所有相关国家提交完全相同的档案;缺乏综合信息管理系统;国家药品监管机构或东非共同体网站上缺乏信息;以及监测和跟踪评估报告方面的挑战。使用强大的信息技术系统对东非共同体产品进行集中跟踪对于应对已确定的挑战并提高监管有效性和效率至关重要。需要一个中央支付点来加快流程,并确保国家和地区网站上决策信息的透明度和可获取性。其他关键的改进策略包括提高评估人员的能力、工作和信息共享以及区域联合评估的协调机制,最终建立一个区域药品机构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/94b67a395523/fphar-13-891506-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/84c53cf8a172/fphar-13-891506-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/8d0eabe61565/fphar-13-891506-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/73bf36b64589/fphar-13-891506-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/05260f91fa88/fphar-13-891506-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/130700937518/fphar-13-891506-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/9354d7ce9f0c/fphar-13-891506-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/94b67a395523/fphar-13-891506-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/84c53cf8a172/fphar-13-891506-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/8d0eabe61565/fphar-13-891506-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/73bf36b64589/fphar-13-891506-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/05260f91fa88/fphar-13-891506-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/130700937518/fphar-13-891506-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/9354d7ce9f0c/fphar-13-891506-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc36/9294367/94b67a395523/fphar-13-891506-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the East African Community Joint Assessment Procedure by Member Countries: The Way Forward.东非共同体成员国对联合评估程序有效性和效率的评估:前进之路
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 5;13:891506. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.891506. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the East African community joint assessment procedure by pharmaceutical companies: Opportunities for improvement.制药公司对东非共同体联合评估程序的有效性和效率评估:改进机会
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 3;13:1031289. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1031289. eCollection 2022.
3
Assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the economic community of West African States Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative by the pharmaceutical industry.制药行业对西非国家经济共同体药品监管协调倡议的有效性和效率评估。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 9;14:1184108. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1184108. eCollection 2023.
4
Assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the West Africa medicines regulatory harmonization initiative by the member countries.成员国对西非药品监管协调倡议的有效性和效率进行评估。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 25;13:1069345. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1069345. eCollection 2022.
5
Evaluation of good review practices in member authorities of the East African Medicines Regulatory Harmonisation initiative: strategies for alignment with African medicines agency.评估东非药品监管协调倡议成员国当局的良好审评实践:与非洲药品管理局保持一致的策略
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 29;11:1437970. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1437970. eCollection 2024.
6
Regulatory performance of the East African Community joint assessment procedure: The way forward for regulatory systems strengthening.东非共同体联合评估程序的监管绩效:加强监管系统的未来之路。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 May;140:105383. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105383. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
7
Evaluation of the review models and approval timelines of authorities participating in the East African Medicine Regulatory Harmonisation initiative: alignment and strategies for moving forward.参与东非药品监管协调倡议的各当局审评模式及审批时限评估:协调一致及未来推进策略
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 17;11:1438041. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1438041. eCollection 2024.
8
Pharmaceutical Industry Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the ZaZiBoNa Collaborative Medicines Registration Initiative: The Way Forward.药品行业对扎齐博纳药品注册合作倡议的有效性和效率评估:前进之路。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 25;9:898725. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.898725. eCollection 2022.
9
Industrial perceptions of medicines regulatory harmonization in the East African Community.东非共同体中对药品监管协调的产业看法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0218617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218617. eCollection 2019.
10
What makes joint assessment procedures attractive to the innovative industry: successes, challenges, and proposed improvements.联合评估程序对创新产业具有吸引力的因素:成功之处、挑战及改进建议。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 4;10:1207954. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1207954. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Suggested Improvements to the Current East African Community Medicines Regulatory Harmonization Joint Review Process and a Proposed New Review Model for this Initiative.对当前东非共同体药品监管协调联合审查程序的建议改进以及该倡议的新审查模式提案。
Pharmaceut Med. 2025 Mar;39(2):125-141. doi: 10.1007/s40290-025-00554-1. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
2
Mpox in East Africa: Learning from COVID-19 and Ebola to Strengthen Public Health Responses.东非的猴痘疫情:从新冠疫情和埃博拉疫情中汲取经验,以加强公共卫生应对措施。
Viruses. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):1578. doi: 10.3390/v16101578.
3
Evaluation of good review practices in member authorities of the East African Medicines Regulatory Harmonisation initiative: strategies for alignment with African medicines agency.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the registration process of the medicines control authority of Zimbabwe with Australia, Canada, Singapore, and Switzerland: benchmarking best practices.津巴布韦药品监管当局与澳大利亚、加拿大、新加坡和瑞士注册流程的比较:最佳实践基准
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jan;15(1):109-119. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2022.1987883. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
2
Evaluation of the Review Models and Approval Timelines of Countries Participating in the Southern African Development Community: Alignment and Strategies for Moving Forward.对参与南部非洲发展共同体国家的审查模式和审批时间表的评估:协调与推进战略
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 27;8:742200. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.742200. eCollection 2021.
3
评估东非药品监管协调倡议成员国当局的良好审评实践:与非洲药品管理局保持一致的策略
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 29;11:1437970. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1437970. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison of Three Regional Medicines Regulatory Harmonisation Initiatives in Africa: Opportunities for Improvement and Alignment.比较非洲的三种区域药品监管协调倡议:改进和统一的机会。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8070. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8070. Epub 2024 May 5.
5
Availability of essential medicines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study examining experiences and level of preparedness in Kenya.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间基本药物的可及性:一项关于肯尼亚经验和准备水平的定性研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;4(7):e0002547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002547. eCollection 2024.
6
What makes joint assessment procedures attractive to the innovative industry: successes, challenges, and proposed improvements.联合评估程序对创新产业具有吸引力的因素:成功之处、挑战及改进建议。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 4;10:1207954. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1207954. eCollection 2023.
7
Best practices in the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative: Perspectives of regulators and medicines manufacturers.非洲药品监管协调倡议中的最佳实践:监管机构与药品制造商的观点
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Apr 26;3(4):e0001651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001651. eCollection 2023.
8
Evaluation of Risk-Based Approaches to the Registration of Medicines: Current Status Among African Regulatory Authorities.基于风险的药品注册方法评估:非洲监管机构的现状。
Pharmaceut Med. 2023 May;37(3):251-260. doi: 10.1007/s40290-023-00472-0. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
9
Assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the West Africa medicines regulatory harmonization initiative by the member countries.成员国对西非药品监管协调倡议的有效性和效率进行评估。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 25;13:1069345. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1069345. eCollection 2022.
10
Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the East African community joint assessment procedure by pharmaceutical companies: Opportunities for improvement.制药公司对东非共同体联合评估程序的有效性和效率评估:改进机会
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 3;13:1031289. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1031289. eCollection 2022.
South African Regulatory Authority: The Impact of Reliance on the Review Process Leading to Improved Patient Access.
南非监管机构:依赖审查程序对改善患者可及性的影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jul 23;12:699063. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.699063. eCollection 2021.
4
Establishment of the African Medicines Agency: progress, challenges and regulatory readiness.非洲药品管理局的设立:进展、挑战与监管准备情况
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Mar 8;14(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00281-9.
5
Implementation of a Framework for an Abridged Review Using Good Reliance Practices: Optimising the Medicine Regulatory Review Process in South Africa.采用良好信赖惯例实施精简审查框架:优化南非药品监管审查流程。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1199-1207. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00144-0. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
6
Coming together to improve access to medicines: The genesis of the East African Community's Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative.汇聚力量,改善药品可及性:东非共同体药品监管协调倡议的缘起。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 12;17(8):e1003133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003133. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Optimizing the East African Community's Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative in 2020-2022: A Roadmap for the Future.2020-2022 年优化东非共同体药品监管协调倡议:未来路线图。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 12;17(8):e1003129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003129. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Improving access to quality medicines in East Africa: An independent perspective on the East African Community Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative.提高东非获得高质量药物的机会:对东非共同体药品监管协调倡议的独立看法。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 12;17(8):e1003092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003092. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
A new approach to an old problem: Overview of the East African Community's Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative.解决老问题的新方法:东非共同体药品监管协调倡议概述
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 12;17(8):e1003099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003099. eCollection 2020 Aug.
10
Eight years of the East African Community Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative: Implementation, progress, and lessons learned.东非共同体药品监管协调倡议八年:实施、进展和经验教训。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 12;17(8):e1003134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003134. eCollection 2020 Aug.