Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, UK.
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Apr 11;39(1):e20. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000144.
Multi-stakeholder interactions have evolved at product and policy levels. There is a need to assess the current and future landscape of interactions between companies, and regulatory and HTA agencies to address challenges and identify areas for improvement.
The aims of this study were to review the current interactions within and across regulatory and HTA agencies, and companies' experiences in engaging in these activities; to assess the added value of interactions as well as limitations; to explore the future ecosystem for stakeholder interactions.
Three separate questionnaires were developed for companies, regulators and HTA agencies, respectively, to assess their experiences and perceptions. The responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and discussed at a multi-stakeholder workshop. Key outcomes from the surveys and workshop discussion were reported.
All seven regulators and seven HTA agencies in the survey indicated that they had stakeholder interactions. More formal collaboration occurred with regulators compared with HTA agencies. All nine companies have taken early advice but indicated the need for future prioritization. Success indicators can be built at the product and therapy levels, with the added value of faster patient access. Four principles were proposed for the future ecosystem: separate remit and functions between regulators and HTA; align processes; converge evidence requirements where possible; increase transparency.
This research brought together regulators, HTA agencies, companies to examine how they interact with one another. We propose measures of value and make recommendations on future evolution to enable better evidence generation and improve regulatory and HTA decision-making.
多方利益相关者在产品和政策层面的互动已经发展起来。有必要评估公司、监管和 HTA 机构之间互动的当前和未来格局,以应对挑战并确定改进领域。
本研究旨在回顾监管和 HTA 机构内部和之间的当前互动,以及公司在参与这些活动方面的经验;评估互动的附加值和局限性;探讨利益相关者互动的未来生态系统。
分别为公司、监管机构和 HTA 机构开发了三份独立的问卷,以评估他们的经验和看法。使用描述性统计分析对回复进行分析,并在多方利益相关者研讨会上进行讨论。报告了调查和研讨会讨论的关键结果。
调查中的所有七家监管机构和七家 HTA 机构都表示他们有利益相关者的互动。与 HTA 机构相比,与监管机构的合作更加正式。所有九家公司都已采取早期建议,但表示需要未来的优先排序。成功指标可以在产品和治疗水平上建立,附加价值是更快的患者获得治疗。提出了未来生态系统的四项原则:监管机构和 HTA 之间的职责和功能分开;调整流程;在可能的情况下整合证据要求;增加透明度。
这项研究汇集了监管机构、HTA 机构和公司,以研究他们如何相互互动。我们提出了衡量价值的措施,并就未来的发展提出建议,以促进更好的证据生成并改善监管和 HTA 决策。