Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情健康危机中的前瞻性记忆与积极偏见:衰老的影响

Prospective Memory and Positivity Bias in the COVID-19 Health Crisis: The Effects of Aging.

作者信息

Aizpurua Alaitz, Migueles Malen, Aranberri Ainara

机构信息

Faculty of Pychology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, San Sebastián, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 21;12:666977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666977. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether the observed tendency to remember more positive than negative past events (positivity phenomena) also appears when recalling hypothetical events about the future. In this study, young, middle-aged, and older adults were presented with 28 statements about the future associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, half positive and half negative. In addition, half of these statements were endowed with personal implications while the other half had a more social connotations. Participants rated their agreement/disagreement with each statement and, after a distraction task, they recalled as many statements as possible. There was no difference in the agreement ratings between the three age groups, but the participants agreed with positive statements more than with negative ones and they identified more with statements of social content than of personal content. The younger and older individuals recalled more statements than the middle-aged people. More importantly, older participants recalled more positive than negative statements (positivity effect), and showed a greater tendency to turn negative statements into more positive or neutral ones (positivity bias). These findings showed that the positivity effect occurs in even such complex and situations as the present pandemic, especially in older adults. The results are discussed by reference to the notion of commission errors and false memories resulting from the activation of cognitive biases.

摘要

本研究旨在确定,在回忆有关未来的假设事件时,是否也会出现比消极过去事件更容易记住积极过去事件的这种观察到的倾向(积极效应现象)。在本研究中,向年轻人、中年人和老年人呈现了28条与新冠疫情相关的关于未来的陈述,其中一半是积极的,一半是消极的。此外,这些陈述中有一半具有个人影响,而另一半具有更多的社会内涵。参与者对每条陈述的同意/不同意程度进行评分,在完成一项干扰任务后,他们尽可能多地回忆陈述内容。三个年龄组在同意程度评分上没有差异,但参与者对积极陈述的认同高于消极陈述,并且他们对具有社会内容的陈述的认同高于具有个人内容的陈述。年轻人和老年人比中年人回忆起更多的陈述内容。更重要的是,年长的参与者回忆起的积极陈述比消极陈述更多(积极效应),并且表现出将消极陈述转变为更积极或中性陈述的更大倾向(积极偏差)。这些发现表明,即使在当前疫情这样复杂的情况下,积极效应也会出现,尤其是在老年人中。通过参考认知偏差激活导致的委托错误和错误记忆的概念对结果进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验