• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The seven sins of memory: an update.记忆的七大罪:更新。
Memory. 2022 Jan;30(1):37-42. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1873391. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
2
Memory Sins in Applied Settings: What Kind of Progress?应用场景中的记忆错误:取得了怎样的进展?
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2022 Dec;11(4):445-460. doi: 10.1037/mac0000078.
3
The seven sins of memory: implications for self.记忆的七宗罪:对自我的影响
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Oct;1001:226-39. doi: 10.1196/annals.1279.012.
4
The seven sins of memory. Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience.记忆的七大罪。来自心理学和认知神经科学的见解。
Am Psychol. 1999 Mar;54(3):182-203. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.182.
5
Misattribution, false recognition and the sins of memory.错误归因、错误识别与记忆的失误。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 29;356(1413):1385-93. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0938.
6
Media, Technology, and the Sins of Memory.媒体、技术与记忆之罪
Mem Mind Media. 2022;1. doi: 10.1017/mem.2021.3. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
7
When your memory malfunctions: implications for the manager.当你的记忆出现故障时:对管理者的启示
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2003 Jan-Mar;22(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/00126450-200301000-00008.
8
Bias and constructive processes in a self-memory system.自我记忆系统中的偏差和建设性过程。
Memory. 2024 Jul;32(6):656-665. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2232568. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
9
Memory: sins and virtues.记忆:罪恶与美德。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Nov;1303(1):56-60. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12168. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
10
Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory.适应的建构过程与记忆的未来。
Am Psychol. 2012 Nov;67(8):603-13. doi: 10.1037/a0029869.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing autobiographical memory consistency: Machine and human approaches.评估自传体记忆的一致性:机器与人工方法
Behav Res Methods. 2025 May 6;57(6):163. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02690-7.
2
Are False Memory and Creative Thinking Mediated by Common Neural Substrates? An fMRI Meta-Analysis.错误记忆与创造性思维是否由共同的神经基质介导?一项功能磁共振成像荟萃分析。
Creat Res J. 2025;37(1):6-21. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2269356. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
Exploring Inhibitory Control Processes in Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory (HSAM): A Single Case Study.探究超优自传体记忆(HSAM)中的抑制控制过程:一项单病例研究
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 21;8(1):20. doi: 10.5334/joc.421. eCollection 2025.
4
Effects of Booking Horizon Reduction on Cancellation Rates: An Experimental Analysis in Pediatric Outpatient Care.缩短预约期限对取消率的影响:儿科门诊护理的实验分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Nov 18;9(2):23814683241298673. doi: 10.1177/23814683241298673. eCollection 2024 Jul-Dec.
5
New strategies for the cognitive science of dreaming.梦境认知科学的新策略。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Dec;28(12):1105-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.10.004. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
6
Eliminating episodic memory?消除情景记忆?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Nov 4;379(1913):20230413. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0413. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
7
Surface matches prevail over distant analogs during retrieval.在检索过程中,表面匹配比远距离类比更具优势。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Apr;53(3):775-791. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01605-9. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
8
False memories in forensic psychology: do cognition and brain activity tell the same story?法医心理学中的错误记忆:认知与大脑活动是否讲述相同的故事?
Front Psychol. 2024 May 16;15:1327196. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1327196. eCollection 2024.
9
Do cognitive abilities reduce eyewitness susceptibility to the misinformation effect? A systematic review.认知能力能否降低目击者对错误信息效应的易感性?一项系统综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2410-2436. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02512-5. Epub 2024 May 2.
10
Uncertainty salience reduces the accessibility of episodic future thoughts.凸显不确定性会降低情景式未来思维的可及性。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jun;88(4):1399-1411. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01962-9. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Memory suppression and its deficiency in psychological disorders: A focused meta-analysis.记忆抑制及其在心理障碍中的缺失:一项集中的荟萃分析。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 May;150(5):828-850. doi: 10.1037/xge0000971. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
2
False Memories for Fake News During Ireland's Abortion Referendum.爱尔兰堕胎公投期间对假新闻的虚假记忆。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Oct;30(10):1449-1459. doi: 10.1177/0956797619864887. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
3
Looking on the Bright Side: Aging and the Impact of Emotional Future Simulation on Subsequent Memory.乐观展望:衰老与情绪性未来模拟对后续记忆的影响。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Oct 16;75(9):1831-1840. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz041.
4
Adaptive constructive processes: An episodic specificity induction impacts false recall in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.适应型构建过程:情节特异性诱发在 Deese-Roediger-McDermott 范式中影响虚假回忆。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Sep;148(9):1480-1493. doi: 10.1037/xge0000577. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
5
fMRI evidence supporting the role of memory conflict in the déjà vu experience.支持记忆冲突在幻觉体验中起作用的 fMRI 证据。
Memory. 2021 Aug;29(7):921-932. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1524496. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Enhanced brain activity associated with memory access in highly superior autobiographical memory.高超常自传体记忆中与记忆访问相关的大脑活动增强。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 24;115(30):7795-7800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802730115. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
7
Mind-Wandering as a Natural Kind: A Family-Resemblances View.心流体验作为一种自然类别:家族相似性观点。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;22(6):479-490. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.010.
8
Simulation, false memories, and the planning of future events.模拟、错误记忆与未来事件规划
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):26-36. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000575. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
9
An Optimistic Outlook Creates a Rosy Past: The Impact of Episodic Simulation on Subsequent Memory.乐观展望塑造美好过去:情节模拟对后续记忆的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jun;29(6):936-946. doi: 10.1177/0956797617753936. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
Déjà Vu: An Illusion of Prediction.似曾相识:一种预测的错觉。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;29(4):635-644. doi: 10.1177/0956797617743018. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

记忆的七大罪:更新。

The seven sins of memory: an update.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2022 Jan;30(1):37-42. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1873391. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2021.1873391
PMID:33459149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8285452/
Abstract

Memory serves critical functions in everyday life, but it is also vulnerable to error and illusion. Two decades ago, I proposed that memory errors could be classified into seven basic categories or "sins": , and I argued that each of the seven sins provides important insights concerning the fundamentally constructive nature of human memory, while at the same time reflecting its adaptive features. In this article I briefly summarise some key developments during the past two decades that have increased our understanding of the nature, consequences, and adaptive functions of the memory sins.

摘要

记忆在日常生活中起着至关重要的作用,但它也容易出错和产生幻觉。二十年前,我提出记忆错误可以分为七种基本类型或“罪过”: 。我认为,这七种罪过中的每一种都提供了关于人类记忆的基本建设性本质的重要见解,同时反映了其适应性特征。在本文中,我简要总结了过去二十年来的一些重要发展,这些发展增加了我们对记忆罪过的本质、后果和适应性功能的理解。