Suppr超能文献

我们何时应进行术中胆管造影?对1000例连续腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性评估。

When Should We Perform Intraoperative Cholangiography? A Prospective Assessment of 1000 Consecutive Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies.

作者信息

Dreifuss Nicolás H, Lendoire Mateo, McCormack Lucas, Capitanich Pablo, Iovaldi Mario L, Schlottmann Francisco

机构信息

Department of Surgery.

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Aug 9;32(1):3-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000985.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) has been historically used to detect common bile duct (CBD) stones, delineate biliary anatomy, and avoid or promptly diagnose bile duct injuries (BDIs) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We aimed to determine the usefulness of routine IOC during LC in an urban teaching hospital.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients undergoing LC with routine IOC from 2016 to 2018 was prospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes of interest were: CBD stones, BDI, and anatomical variations of the biliary tract. Secondary outcomes of interest were: IOC success rate, IOC time, and readmission for residual lithiasis. A comparative analysis was performed between patients with and without preoperative suspicion of CBD stones.

RESULTS

A total of 1003 LC were analyzed; IOC was successful in 918 (91.5%) patients. Mean IOC time was 10 (4 to 30) minutes. Mean radiation received by the surgeon per procedure was 0.06 millisieverts (mSv). Normal IOC was found in 856 (93.2%) patients. CBD stones and aberrant biliary anatomy were present in 58 (6.3%) and 4 (0.4%) cases, respectively. Two patients (0.2%) underwent unnecessary CBD exploration because of false-positive IOC. Four patients (0.4%) with normal IOC were readmitted for residual CBD stones. Five (0.5%) minor BDI undetected by the IOC were diagnosed. Patients with preoperative suspicion of CBD stones had significantly higher rates of CBD stones detected on IOC as compared with those without suspicion (23.2% vs. 2.1%, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Routine use of IOC resulted in low rates of BDI diagnosis, aberrant biliary anatomy identification and/or CBD stones detection. Selection of patients for IOC, rather than routine use of IOC appears a more reasonable approach.

摘要

背景

术中胆管造影(IOC)一直以来都被用于检测胆总管(CBD)结石、描绘胆道解剖结构,以及在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)期间避免或及时诊断胆管损伤(BDI)。我们旨在确定在一家城市教学医院进行LC时常规IOC的效用。

方法

对2016年至2018年连续接受常规IOC的LC患者系列进行前瞻性分析。感兴趣的主要结局为:CBD结石、BDI和胆道解剖变异。感兴趣的次要结局为:IOC成功率、IOC时间和因残留结石而再入院。对术前怀疑有CBD结石和无此怀疑的患者进行了比较分析。

结果

共分析了1003例LC;918例(91.5%)患者IOC成功。平均IOC时间为10(4至30)分钟。外科医生每次手术接受的平均辐射量为0.06毫希沃特(mSv)。856例(93.2%)患者IOC正常。分别有58例(6.3%)和4例(0.4%)存在CBD结石和异常胆道解剖结构。2例患者(0.2%)因IOC假阳性而接受了不必要的CBD探查。4例IOC正常的患者(0.4%)因残留CBD结石而再入院。诊断出5例(0.5%)IOC未检测到的轻微BDI。与无怀疑的患者相比,术前怀疑有CBD结石的患者IOC检测到CBD结石的比率显著更高(23.2%对2.1%,P<0.0001)。

结论

常规使用IOC导致BDI诊断、异常胆道解剖结构识别和/或CBD结石检测的比率较低。选择患者进行IOC,而非常规使用IOC似乎是一种更合理的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验