Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Oncologist. 2021 Nov;26(11):934-940. doi: 10.1002/onco.13930. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
The use of molecular testing in oncology is rapidly expanding. The aim of this study was to determine how oncologists describe molecular testing and whether patients understand the terminology being used.
Sixty conversations between oncologists and patients about molecular testing were observed, and the used technical terms were noted by the researcher. Patients were interviewed post-conversation to assess their understanding of the noted technical terms. A patient understanding score was calculated for each participant. Comparisons of the terms were conducted using χ tests, Fisher's exact tests, or ANOVA when appropriate.
Sixty-one unique technical terms were used by oncologists, to describe seven topics. "Mutation" was a challenging term for patients to understand with 48.8% (21/43 mentions) of participants correctly defining the term. "Genetic testing" and "Gene" were understood a little more than half the time (53.3%; 8/15 and 56.4%; 22/39 respectively). "DNA" was well understood (80%; 12/15). There was no correlation between the terms being defined by the oncologist in the conversation, and the likelihood of the patient providing a correct definition. White participants were significantly more likely to understand both "mutation" and "genetic testing" than non-White participants. Forty-two percent (n = 25) of participants had an understanding score below 50%, and a higher family income was significantly correlated with a higher score.
Our results show that oncologists use variable terminology to describe molecular testing, which is often not understood. Because oncologists defining the terms did not correlate with understanding, it is imperative to develop new, improved methods to explain molecular testing.
The use of molecular testing is expanding in oncology, yet little is known about how effectively clinicians are communicating information about molecular testing and whether patients understand the terminology used. The results of this study indicate that patients do not understand some of the terminology used by their clinicians and that clinicians tend to use highly variable terminology to describe molecular testing. These results highlight the need to develop and implement effective methods to explain molecular testing terminology to patients to ensure that patients have the tools to make autonomous and informed decisions about their treatment.
分子检测在肿瘤学中的应用正在迅速扩展。本研究旨在确定肿瘤学家如何描述分子检测,以及患者是否理解所用的术语。
观察了 60 位肿瘤学家与患者之间关于分子检测的对话,并由研究人员记录下所用的专业术语。在对话后对患者进行采访,以评估他们对所记录的专业术语的理解程度。为每位参与者计算了一个患者理解得分。使用 χ 检验、Fisher 确切检验或适当情况下的 ANOVA 进行术语比较。
肿瘤学家使用了 61 个独特的专业术语来描述 7 个主题。“突变”是一个令患者难以理解的术语,有 48.8%(43 次提及中的 21 次)的参与者正确定义了该术语。“基因检测”和“基因”的理解程度略高于一半(分别为 53.3%,15 次提及中的 8 次;56.4%,39 次提及中的 22 次)。“DNA”的理解程度较好(80%,15 次提及中的 12 次)。在对话中,肿瘤学家所定义的术语与患者提供正确定义的可能性之间没有相关性。白人参与者理解“突变”和“基因检测”的可能性明显高于非白人参与者。42%(n=25)的参与者的理解得分低于 50%,家庭收入较高与得分较高显著相关。
我们的结果表明,肿瘤学家使用不同的术语来描述分子检测,而这些术语往往不为患者所理解。由于肿瘤学家定义术语与理解术语之间没有相关性,因此必须开发新的、改进的方法来解释分子检测。
分子检测在肿瘤学中的应用正在扩展,但对于临床医生有效传达有关分子检测信息的程度以及患者是否理解所用术语知之甚少。本研究结果表明,患者不理解其临床医生使用的一些术语,并且临床医生倾向于使用高度可变的术语来描述分子检测。这些结果突出表明,需要开发和实施有效的方法来向患者解释分子检测术语,以确保患者拥有工具来自主做出知情决策。