• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体形成过程中合作增加的神经认知机制。

A neurocognitive mechanism for increased cooperation during group formation.

作者信息

Zajkowski Wojciech, Badman Ryan P, Haruno Masahiko, Akaishi Rei

机构信息

Social Value Decision-Making Collaboration Unit, RIKEN Centre for Brain Science BTCC TOYOTA Collaboration Center, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan.

Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Commun Psychol. 2024 Dec 23;2(1):127. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00177-3.

DOI:10.1038/s44271-024-00177-3
PMID:39715935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11666775/
Abstract

How do group size changes influence cooperation within groups? To examine this question, we performed a dynamic, network-based prisoner's dilemma experiment with fMRI. Across 83 human participants, we observed increased cooperation as group size increased. However, our computational modeling analysis of behavior and fMRI revealed that groups size itself did not increase cooperation. Rather, interaction between (1) participants' stable prosocial tendencies, and (2) dynamic reciprocal strategy weighed by memory confidence, underlies the group size-modulated increase in cooperation because the balance between them shifts towards the prosocial tendency with higher memory demands in larger groups. We found that memory confidence was encoded in fusiform gyrus and precuneus, whereas its integration with prosocial tendencies was reflected in the left DLPFC and dACC. Therefore, interaction between recall uncertainty during reciprocal interaction (i.e., forgetting) and one's individual prosocial preference is a core pillar of emergent cooperation in more naturalistic and dynamic group formation.

摘要

群体规模的变化如何影响群体内部的合作?为了研究这个问题,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)进行了一项基于网络的动态囚徒困境实验。在83名人类参与者中,我们观察到随着群体规模的增加,合作也有所增加。然而,我们对行为和功能磁共振成像的计算建模分析表明,群体规模本身并不会增加合作。相反,(1)参与者稳定的亲社会倾向与(2)由记忆信心加权的动态互惠策略之间的相互作用,是群体规模调节合作增加的基础,因为在较大群体中,随着记忆需求的增加,它们之间的平衡向亲社会倾向倾斜。我们发现,记忆信心在梭状回和楔前叶中编码,而其与亲社会倾向的整合则反映在左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)和背前扣带回(dACC)中。因此,在互惠互动过程中的回忆不确定性(即遗忘)与个人亲社会偏好之间的相互作用,是在更自然和动态的群体形成中出现合作的核心支柱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/9e33904ee852/44271_2024_177_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/975febff4a7b/44271_2024_177_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/727471ebcbcf/44271_2024_177_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/62a06ca596bb/44271_2024_177_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/6ce6b1cb3754/44271_2024_177_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/227c4022eabd/44271_2024_177_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/9e33904ee852/44271_2024_177_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/975febff4a7b/44271_2024_177_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/727471ebcbcf/44271_2024_177_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/62a06ca596bb/44271_2024_177_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/6ce6b1cb3754/44271_2024_177_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/227c4022eabd/44271_2024_177_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/11666775/9e33904ee852/44271_2024_177_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A neurocognitive mechanism for increased cooperation during group formation.群体形成过程中合作增加的神经认知机制。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Dec 23;2(1):127. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00177-3.
2
Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation.亲社会倾向改变网络动态,促进合作。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 23;7(1):357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00265-x.
3
Relationship between cooperation in an iterated prisoner's dilemma game and the discounting of hypothetical outcomes.重复囚徒困境博弈中的合作与假设结果的贴现之间的关系。
Learn Behav. 2005 Aug;33(3):324-36. doi: 10.3758/bf03192861.
4
Shifting prosocial intuitions: neurocognitive evidence for a value-based account of group-based cooperation.转移亲社会直觉:基于价值的群体合作神经认知证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Jun 23;15(4):371-381. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa055.
5
Heuristics guide the implementation of social preferences in one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma experiments.启发法指导一次性囚徒困境实验中社会偏好的实施。
Sci Rep. 2014 Oct 28;4:6790. doi: 10.1038/srep06790.
6
Oxytocin and vasopressin modulation of prisoner's dilemma strategies.催产素和血管升压素对囚徒困境策略的调节。
J Psychopharmacol. 2020 Aug;34(8):891-900. doi: 10.1177/0269881120913145. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
7
The continuous prisoner's dilemma and the evolution of cooperation through reciprocal altruism with variable investment.连续囚徒困境与通过可变投资的互惠利他主义实现合作的进化
Am Nat. 2002 Oct;160(4):421-38. doi: 10.1086/342070.
8
Social contact patterns can buffer costs of forgetting in the evolution of cooperation.社会接触模式可以缓冲合作进化中遗忘的代价。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jun 13;285(1880). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0407.
9
People's dispositional cooperative tendencies towards robots are unaffected by robots' negative emotional displays in prisoner's dilemma games.在囚徒困境游戏中,人们对机器人的合作倾向不因机器人的负面情绪表现而受到影响。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Aug;36(5):995-1019. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2054781. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
10
MDMA Increases Cooperation and Recruitment of Social Brain Areas When Playing Trustworthy Players in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.MDMA 增加了在迭代囚徒困境中与可信赖玩家一起玩时的合作和社交脑区的招募。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 9;39(2):307-320. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1276-18.2018. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Troubleshooting Bayesian cognitive models.贝叶斯认知模型故障排除
Psychol Methods. 2025 Feb;30(1):128-154. doi: 10.1037/met0000554. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
3
Natural behavior is the language of the brain.自然行为是大脑的语言。
Curr Biol. 2022 May 23;32(10):R482-R493. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.031.
4
Uncertainty is maintained and used in working memory.不确定性在工作记忆中被维持和使用。
J Vis. 2021 Aug 2;21(8):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.8.13.
5
Reading between the lines: Listener's vmPFC simulates speaker cooperative choices in communication games.字里行间的解读:听众的腹内侧前额叶皮层在交流游戏中模拟说话者的合作选择。
Sci Adv. 2021 Mar 3;7(10). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe6276. Print 2021 Mar.
6
Effect of Modulating DLPFC Activity on Antisocial and Prosocial Behavior: Evidence From a tDCS Study.调节背外侧前额叶皮层活动对反社会和亲社会行为的影响:来自经颅直流电刺激研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 13;11:579792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579792. eCollection 2020.
7
The prevalence of dyads in social life.社会生活中对偶的普遍性。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244188. eCollection 2020.
8
A brain network supporting social influences in human decision-making.支持人类决策中社会影响的大脑网络。
Sci Adv. 2020 Aug 19;6(34):eabb4159. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb4159. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
Errors and Action Monitoring: .错误与动作监测:.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jan 9;13:453. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00453. eCollection 2019.
10
Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma: an experimental comparison between pure and mixed strategies.囚徒困境中的合作:纯策略与混合策略的实验比较
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jul 10;6(7):182142. doi: 10.1098/rsos.182142. eCollection 2019 Jul.