School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre, Director & Chair, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 9;11(8):e047290. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047290.
Research highlights the importance of early intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder with better outcomes associated with earlier access to early intensive intervention (EII) programmes. However, there is significant variability in response to EII despite children receiving the same programmes.
A prospective, multisite cohort study using a pre-post design assesses the predictors of early intervention outcomes for children who receive EII through six early intervention services (Autism Specific Early Learning and Care Centres, ASELCCs) across Australia. Child and family characteristics at entry to and exit from ASELCCs are ascertained using measures of autism symptoms (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2; Social Communication Questionnaire); cognitive, language and developmental skills (Mullen Scale of Early Learning); adaptive function (Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale-second Edition); behaviours (Child Behaviour Checklist-1.5 to 5 years; Restricted Repetitive Behaviour Scale); parental stress (Parent Stress Index-4 Short Form); quality of life (Quality of Life in Autism Scale) and a semistructured family history questionnaire for sociodemographic, family and psychosocial characteristics. Characteristics at entry are used as predictors of outcome at exit following EII approximately 12 months later. The change in score from baseline to exit will be the primary outcome of interest. The mediating role of family and psychosocial factors will also be considered.
University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HC14267).
Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. A report summarising data and the interpretation of data will be published.
研究强调了为自闭症谱系障碍儿童提供早期干预的重要性,早期获得密集早期干预(EII)计划与更好的结果相关。然而,尽管儿童接受相同的计划,但对 EII 的反应存在显著差异。
一项前瞻性、多地点队列研究采用前后设计,评估了澳大利亚六个早期干预服务(自闭症特定早期学习和关怀中心,ASELCC)通过 EII 接受的儿童早期干预结果的预测因素。使用自闭症症状评估量表(自闭症诊断观察量表-2;社交沟通问卷);认知、语言和发育技能(Mullen 早期学习量表);适应功能(Vineland 适应行为量表第二版);行为(儿童行为检查表-1.5 至 5 岁;受限重复行为量表);父母压力(父母压力指数-4 短表);生活质量(自闭症生活质量量表)和半结构化家庭史问卷来确定进入和退出 ASELCC 时的儿童和家庭特征,用于评估 EII 后大约 12 个月的退出时的结果预测因素。从基线到退出的评分变化将是主要关注的结果。还将考虑家庭和心理社会因素的中介作用。
新南威尔士大学人类研究伦理委员会(HC14267)。
研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在会议上展示。将发表一份总结数据和解释数据的报告。