• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国使用吸入皮质类固醇/长效β-激动剂(糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗或布地奈德/福莫特罗)治疗哮喘患者的症状控制:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。

Symptom control in patients with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonists (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol or budesonide/formoterol) in the US: a retrospective matched cohort study.

机构信息

US Value, Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline plc., NC, USA.

Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Groupe d'analyses, Ltée, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2022 Sep;59(9):1805-1818. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1963767. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1080/02770903.2021.1963767
PMID:34375568
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Treatment with fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI), an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β-agonist therapy, reduces the risk of severe asthma exacerbations and improves lung function and symptom control in patients with asthma. However, real-world data remain limited among asthma patients in the United States (US).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study propensity score (PS) matched adult asthma patients initiating once-daily FF/VI 100/25 mcg with patients initiating twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (B/F) 160/4.5 mcg using a US claims database (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2018). Asthma control was measured by the mean number of short-acting β-agonist (SABA) canisters dispensed per patient-year (PPY) during follow-up. Time to first, and rates of, overall and severe asthma exacerbations were also measured.

RESULTS

After PS matching, 18,531 patients receiving FF/VI were matched to 18,531 patients receiving B/F. Mean SABA canisters dispensed PPY was significantly lower for FF/VI users compared with B/F users (FF/VI: 1.47, B/F: 1.64;  < 0.001). FF/VI use resulted in 13% significantly lower risk of having an overall asthma-related exacerbation and 22% lower risk of a severe exacerbation versus B/F use (overall exacerbation hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.87 [0.82-0.92],  < 0.001; severe exacerbation HR [95% CI]: 0.78 [0.63-0.97],  = 0.027). Asthma-related exacerbation rates per 100 patient-days were also significantly lower for the FF/VI group compared with the B/F group (overall: 0.0475 vs. 0.0558,  < 0.001; severe: 0.0026 vs. 0.0033,  = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world practice, initiation of once-daily FF/VI 100/25 mcg in adults with asthma was associated with lower use of SABA and fewer asthma-related exacerbations, which may indicate better asthma control, when compared with use of twice-daily B/F 160/4.5 mcg.

摘要

目的

氟替卡松维兰特罗(FF/VI)是一种吸入性皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂疗法,治疗可降低哮喘患者严重哮喘加重的风险,并改善肺功能和症状控制。然而,美国(US)哮喘患者的真实世界数据仍然有限。

方法

本回顾性队列研究使用美国索赔数据库(2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日),对每日一次 FF/VI 100/25mcg 起始治疗的成年哮喘患者进行倾向评分(PS)匹配,以匹配每日两次布地奈德/福莫特罗(B/F)160/4.5mcg 起始治疗的患者。通过随访期间每位患者每年(PPY)使用的短效β激动剂(SABA)罐数来衡量哮喘控制情况。还测量了首次发生和总体及重度哮喘加重的时间和发生率。

结果

PS 匹配后,18531 例接受 FF/VI 治疗的患者与 18531 例接受 B/F 治疗的患者相匹配。与 B/F 组相比,FF/VI 组患者的 SABA 罐 PPY 明显更低(FF/VI:1.47,B/F:1.64;<0.001)。与 B/F 相比,FF/VI 治疗可使总体哮喘相关加重的风险降低 13%,严重加重的风险降低 22%(总体加重风险比[HR] [95%置信区间(CI)]:0.87 [0.82-0.92],<0.001;严重加重 HR [95% CI]:0.78 [0.63-0.97],=0.027)。与 B/F 组相比,FF/VI 组的哮喘相关加重率也明显更低(每 100 患者日:总体:0.0475 比 0.0558,<0.001;严重:0.0026 比 0.0033,=0.020)。

结论

在真实世界的实践中,与每日两次 B/F 160/4.5mcg 相比,成人哮喘患者每日一次 FF/VI 100/25mcg 的起始治疗与更低的 SABA 使用量和更少的哮喘相关加重相关,这可能表明更好的哮喘控制。

相似文献

1
Symptom control in patients with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonists (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol or budesonide/formoterol) in the US: a retrospective matched cohort study.在美国使用吸入皮质类固醇/长效β-激动剂(糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗或布地奈德/福莫特罗)治疗哮喘患者的症状控制:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
J Asthma. 2022 Sep;59(9):1805-1818. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1963767. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
2
Assessment of COPD-related outcomes in patients initiating a once daily or twice daily ICS/LABA.评估每日一次或每日两次 ICS/LABA 起始治疗的 COPD 患者相关结局。
Respir Med. 2019 Apr;150:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
3
Comparison of early effects of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy with fluticasone furoate/vilanterol for asthma patients requiring step-up from inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy.布地奈德/福莫特罗维持和缓解治疗与糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗对需要从吸入性糖皮质激素单药治疗升级的哮喘患者的早期疗效比较。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Apr;37:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
4
Once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 100/25 mcg versus twice daily combination therapies in COPD - mixed treatment comparisons of clinical efficacy.每日一次糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗100/25微克与慢性阻塞性肺疾病每日两次联合治疗的比较——临床疗效的混合治疗对比
Respir Res. 2015 Feb 15;16(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0184-8.
5
Efficacy and safety of once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonists (ICS/LABA) in patients with uncontrolled asthma: An open-label, randomized, controlled trial.每日一次氟替卡松维兰特罗(FF/VI)与每日两次吸入皮质激素/长效β-激动剂(ICS/LABA)治疗未控制哮喘患者的疗效和安全性:一项开放标签、随机、对照试验。
Respir Med. 2018 Aug;141:111-120. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
6
Once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol versus twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in patients with asthma well controlled on ICS/LABA.在使用吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β2受体激动剂(ICS/LABA)病情得到良好控制的哮喘患者中,每日一次糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗与每日两次丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗的对比研究。
J Asthma. 2018 Sep;55(9):984-993. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1386214. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
7
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Different Types of Inhaled Long-Acting β-Agonist Plus Inhaled Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist vs Inhaled Long-Acting β-Agonist Plus Inhaled Corticosteroid Fixed-Dose Combinations in COPD A Propensity Score-Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Cohort Study.不同类型的长效β激动剂加长效抗胆碱能药物与长效β激动剂加吸入性皮质类固醇固定剂量联合治疗 COPD 的疗效和安全性比较:一项倾向评分逆概率治疗加权队列研究。
Chest. 2021 Oct;160(4):1255-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.025. Epub 2021 May 21.
8
Assessment of Adherence and Asthma Medication Ratio for a Once-Daily and Twice-Daily Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting β-Agonist for Asthma.评估每日一次和每日两次吸入皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂治疗哮喘的依从性和哮喘药物比率。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 May-Jun;7(5):1488-1496.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.12.021. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
9
Fluticasone furoate-vilanterol 100-25 mcg compared with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg in asthma: a randomized trial.糠酸氟替卡松-维兰特罗100-25微克与100微克糠酸氟替卡松治疗哮喘的比较:一项随机试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Sep-Oct;2(5):553-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
10
Persistence and Adherence to ICS/LABA Drugs in UK Patients with Asthma: A Retrospective New-User Cohort Study.英国哮喘患者对 ICS/LABA 药物的坚持和依从性:一项回顾性新使用者队列研究。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2916-2931. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01344-8. Epub 2020 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Budesonide Attains Its Wide Clinical Profile by Alternative Kinetics.布地奈德通过交替动力学获得广泛的临床应用范围。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Apr 15;17(4):503. doi: 10.3390/ph17040503.
2
The Changing Asthma Management Landscape and Need for Appropriate SABA Prescription.哮喘管理领域的变化与适当 SABA 处方的需求。
Adv Ther. 2023 Apr;40(4):1301-1316. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02410-z. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
3
ICS/Ultra LABA in the Treatment of Obstructive Airway Diseases: A Consensus of Indian Experts.ICS/Ultra LABA 在气道阻塞性疾病治疗中的应用:印度专家共识。
Adv Respir Med. 2022 Sep 29;90(5):407-424. doi: 10.3390/arm90050051.