Suppr超能文献

英国哮喘患者对 ICS/LABA 药物的坚持和依从性:一项回顾性新使用者队列研究。

Persistence and Adherence to ICS/LABA Drugs in UK Patients with Asthma: A Retrospective New-User Cohort Study.

机构信息

Real World Solutions, IQVIA, London, UK.

Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline Plc., Brentford, Middlesex, UK.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2916-2931. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01344-8. Epub 2020 May 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is associated with significant economic burden. Inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) combination therapies are considered mainstays of treatment. We describe real-world use of ICS/LABAs by comparing treatment persistence and adherence among patients with asthma in the United Kingdom initiating fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) versus budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FM) or beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol (BDP/FM).

METHODS

A retrospective new-user active comparator database study was conducted in the IQVIA Medical Research Database. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed for FF/VI versus BUD/FM, and FF/VI versus BDP/FM. The primary objective was to compare patient treatment persistence (time to discontinuation), while secondary objectives included assessing adherence (mean proportion of days covered [PDC] with medication in the study period) and the proportions of patients achieving ≥ 50% and ≥ 80% PDC.

RESULTS

New users of FF/VI (N = 966), BUD/FM (N = 5931) and BDP/FM (N = 9607) were identified and PS-matched: FF/VI (n = 945) versus BUD/FM (n = 3272), and FF/VI (n = 902) versus BDP/FM (n = 3465). At 12 months, treatment persistence was 69% (FF/VI), 53% (BUD/FM) and 57% (BDP/FM). The likelihood of treatment discontinuation within 12 months after initiation with FF/VI was 35% lower than with BUD/FM and 31% lower than for BDP/FM (both p < 0.001). Mean PDC was higher for FF/VI compared with BUD/FM (77.7 vs 72.4; p < 0.0001) and BDP/FM (78.2 vs 71.0; p < 0.0001). The odds of achieving ≥ 50% and ≥ 80% PDC were greater for FF/VI than for BUD/FM and BDP/FM.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, patients who initiated FF/VI were less likely to discontinue treatment and showed greater treatment adherence versus patients who initiated BUD/FM or BDP/FM.

摘要

简介

哮喘与巨大的经济负担相关。吸入皮质类固醇和长效β-激动剂(ICS/LABA)联合疗法被认为是治疗的基础。我们通过比较英国开始使用糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗(FF/VI)与布地奈德/福莫特罗(BUD/FM)或丙酸氟替卡松/福莫特罗(BDP/FM)的哮喘患者的治疗持久性和依从性,描述了 ICS/LABA 的真实世界应用。

方法

在 IQVIA 医疗研究数据库中进行了一项回顾性新使用者活性对照数据库研究。对 FF/VI 与 BUD/FM 以及 FF/VI 与 BDP/FM 进行了倾向评分(PS)匹配。主要目的是比较患者的治疗持久性(停药时间),次要目标包括评估依从性(研究期间药物覆盖的平均天数比例[PDC])和达到≥50%和≥80%PDC 的患者比例。

结果

确定了新使用 FF/VI(N=966)、BUD/FM(N=5931)和 BDP/FM(N=9607)的患者,并进行了 PS 匹配:FF/VI(n=945)与 BUD/FM(n=3272),以及 FF/VI(n=902)与 BDP/FM(n=3465)。在 12 个月时,治疗持久性分别为 69%(FF/VI)、53%(BUD/FM)和 57%(BDP/FM)。与 BUD/FM 相比,FF/VI 起始后 12 个月内停药的可能性降低 35%,与 BDP/FM 相比降低 31%(均 p<0.001)。与 BUD/FM(p<0.0001)和 BDP/FM(p<0.0001)相比,FF/VI 的平均 PDC 更高。与 BUD/FM 和 BDP/FM 相比,FF/VI 达到≥50%和≥80%PDC 的可能性更大。

结论

在这项研究中,与开始使用 BUD/FM 或 BDP/FM 的患者相比,开始使用 FF/VI 的患者更不可能停止治疗,并且治疗依从性更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38c6/7467428/0bf9a6336848/12325_2020_1344_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验