Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Aug;9(8). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002931.
Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a tumor vaccine may modulate the immune system to leverage complementary mechanisms of action that lead to sustained T-cell activation and a potent prolonged immunotherapeutic response in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Subjects with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either atezolizumab followed by sipuleucel-T (Arm 1) or sipuleucel-T followed by atezolizumab (Arm 2). The primary endpoint was safety, while secondary endpoints included preliminary clinical activity such as objective tumor response and systemic immune responses that could identify key molecular and immunological changes associated with sequential administration of atezolizumab and sipuleucel-T.
A total of 37 subjects were enrolled. The median age was 75.0 years, median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 21.9 ng/mL, and subjects had a median number of three prior treatments. Most subjects (83.8%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities attributed to either study drug. Immune-related adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 13.5% of subjects, and all of which were grade 1 or 2. Of 23 subjects with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors measurable disease, only one subject in Arm 2 had a partial response (PR) and four subjects overall had stable disease (SD) at 6 months reflecting an objective response rate of 4.3% and a disease control rate of 21.7%. T-cell receptor diversity was higher in subjects with a response, including SD. Immune response to three novel putative antigens (SIK3, KDM1A/LSD1, and PIK3R6) appeared to increase with treatment.
Overall, regardless of the order in which they were administered, the combination of atezolizumab with sipuleucel-T appears to be safe and well tolerated with a comparable safety profile to each agent administered as monotherapy. Correlative immune studies may suggest the combination to be beneficial; however, further studies are needed.
NCT03024216.
联合使用免疫检查点抑制剂和肿瘤疫苗可能会调节免疫系统,利用互补的作用机制,导致转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)中持续的 T 细胞激活和有效的长期免疫治疗反应。
无症状或有轻微症状的 mCRPC 患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配接受阿替利珠单抗联合 sipuleucel-T(Arm1)或 sipuleucel-T 联合阿替利珠单抗(Arm2)治疗。主要终点为安全性,次要终点包括初步的临床活性,如客观肿瘤反应和全身免疫反应,这些反应可以识别与阿替利珠单抗和 sipuleucel-T 序贯给药相关的关键分子和免疫学变化。
共纳入 37 例患者。中位年龄为 75.0 岁,中位前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)为 21.9ng/ml,中位既往治疗数为 3 次。大多数患者(83.8%)至少有一次与治疗相关的不良事件。无研究药物相关的 4 级或 5 级毒性。免疫相关不良事件和输液反应在 13.5%的患者中发生,均为 1 级或 2 级。在 23 例可测量疾病的实体瘤反应评价标准(Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors,RECIST)的患者中,仅有 1 例 Arm2 患者有部分缓解(PR),4 例患者总体在 6 个月时为疾病稳定(SD),反映客观缓解率为 4.3%,疾病控制率为 21.7%。有反应(包括 SD)的患者 T 细胞受体多样性更高。对三个新的潜在抗原(SIK3、KDM1A/LSD1 和 PIK3R6)的免疫反应似乎随着治疗而增加。
总的来说,无论它们的给药顺序如何,阿替利珠单抗联合 sipuleucel-T 联合治疗似乎是安全且耐受良好的,与每种药物单药治疗的安全性特征相当。相关免疫研究可能表明该联合治疗有益;然而,还需要进一步的研究。
NCT03024216。