Suppr超能文献

威尔士连续 4 年进行的年度时点患病率研究表明,病房中脓毒症护理并未得到改善。

Four consecutive yearly point-prevalence studies in Wales indicate lack of improvement in sepsis care on the wards.

机构信息

Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 10;11(1):16222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95648-6.

Abstract

The 'Sepsis Six' bundle was promoted as a deliverable tool outside of the critical care settings, but there is very little data available on the progress and change of sepsis care outside the critical care environment in the UK. Our aim was to compare the yearly prevalence, outcome and the Sepsis Six bundle compliance in patients at risk of mortality from sepsis in non-intensive care environments. Patients with a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of 3 or above and suspected or proven infection were enrolled into four yearly 24-h point prevalence studies, carried out in fourteen hospitals across Wales from 2016 to 2019. We followed up patients to 30 days between 2016-2019 and to 90 days between 2017 and 2019. Out of the 26,947 patients screened 1651 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were recruited. The full 'Sepsis Six' care bundle was completed on 223 (14.0%) occasions, with no significant difference between the years. On 190 (11.5%) occasions none of the bundle elements were completed. There was no significant correlation between bundle element compliance, NEWS or year of study. One hundred and seventy (10.7%) patients were seen by critical care outreach; the 'Sepsis Six' bundle was completed significantly more often in this group (54/170, 32.0%) than for patients who were not reviewed by critical care outreach (168/1385, 11.6%; p < 0.0001). Overall survival to 30 days was 81.7% (1349/1651), with a mean survival time of 26.5 days (95% CI 26.1-26.9) with no difference between each year of study. 90-day survival for years 2017-2019 was 74.7% (949/1271), with no difference between the years. In multivariate regression we identified older age, heart failure, recent chemotherapy, higher frailty score and do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation orders as significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality. Our data suggests that despite efforts to increase sepsis awareness within the NHS, there is poor compliance with the sepsis care bundles and no change in the high mortality over the study period. Further research is needed to determine which time-sensitive ward-based interventions can reduce mortality in patients with sepsis and how can these results be embedded to routine clinical practice.Trial registration Defining Sepsis on the Wards ISRCTN 86502304 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN86502304 prospectively registered 09/05/2016.

摘要

“Sepsis Six”包被宣传为一种可在重症监护环境之外交付的工具,但在英国,重症监护环境之外脓毒症护理的进展和变化方面的数据非常有限。我们的目的是比较非重症监护环境中存在死亡风险的脓毒症患者的每年患病率、结局和“Sepsis Six”包的依从性。具有国家早期预警评分(NEWS)3 分或以上且疑似或证实有感染的患者被纳入了 2016 年至 2019 年在威尔士 14 家医院进行的四次每年 24 小时点患病率研究中。我们在 2016 年至 2019 年期间对患者进行了 30 天的随访,在 2017 年至 2019 年期间进行了 90 天的随访。在筛选出的 26947 名患者中,有 1651 名符合纳入标准并被招募。完整的“Sepsis Six”护理包在 223 次(14.0%)情况下完成,各年份之间没有显著差异。在 190 次(11.5%)情况下,没有完成任何包元素。包元素的依从性、NEWS 或研究年份之间没有显著相关性。有 170 名(10.7%)患者接受了重症监护外联服务;在接受重症监护外联服务的患者(54/170,32.0%)中,“Sepsis Six”包的完成率明显高于未接受重症监护外联服务的患者(168/1385,11.6%;p<0.0001)。30 天的总体生存率为 81.7%(1349/1651),平均生存时间为 26.5 天(95%CI 26.1-26.9),各研究年份之间没有差异。2017-2019 年的 90 天生存率为 74.7%(949/1271),各年份之间没有差异。在多变量回归中,我们发现年龄较大、心力衰竭、近期化疗、更高的虚弱评分和不进行心肺复苏的医嘱与 30 天死亡率增加显著相关。我们的数据表明,尽管 NHS 努力提高脓毒症意识,但脓毒症护理包的依从性很差,在研究期间死亡率没有变化。需要进一步研究确定哪些针对病房的时效性干预措施可以降低脓毒症患者的死亡率,以及如何将这些结果纳入常规临床实践。试验注册 Defining Sepsis on the Wards ISRCTN 86502304 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN86502304 前瞻性注册 2016 年 9 月 5 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1650/8355110/86b000f23aad/41598_2021_95648_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验