• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善病房中脓毒症的预后:引入“Sepsis Six”集束化治疗方案。

Improving outcome of sepsis on the ward: introducing the 'Sepsis Six' bundle.

机构信息

ACT Directorate, Cwm Taf University Health Board, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK.

Cwm Taf University Health Board, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Jan;24(1):33-39. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12358. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1111/nicc.12358
PMID:30039637
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Sepsis Six bundle is designed to facilitate early intervention with three diagnostic and three therapeutic steps to be delivered within 1 h to patients with suspected sepsis.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of delivering the 'Sepsis Six' bundle by the Critical Care Outreach team on patient outcomes.

DESIGN

In a prospective observational study, all adult patients on the general wards from June 2012 to January 2014 with sepsis who were screened and treated by the Critical Care Outreach team were included.

METHODS

The main outcome measure was the change in National Early Warning Score following the delivery of the Sepsis Six bundle within 24 h. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality and overall bundle compliance.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients were included in the analysis. Overall bundle compliance was 84%. National Early Warning Scores decreased significantly 24 h after administering the Sepsis Six, from 7·4 ± 2·6 to 3·1 ± 2·4 (p < 0·001). The distribution of the National Early Warning Score changed significantly. Mortality was lower at 90 days when patients who presented with signs of sepsis within 48 h of hospital admission were compared with those who presented with signs of sepsis after 48 h of hospital admission (14·5% versus 35·4% p < 0·03) despite similar baseline physiological variables.

CONCLUSIONS

We found better outcomes after the administration of Sepsis Six. Reliable delivery of the bundle, defined as 80% of patients receiving the standard of care, is achievable, and our quality improvement data suggest that it is likely to be sustainable in our environment.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Sepsis Six can reduce physiological impairment, monitored by the National Early Warning Scores. Consistent delivery of the bundle can lead to better patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

Sepsis Six 包旨在通过在 1 小时内为疑似脓毒症患者提供三个诊断和三个治疗步骤,促进早期干预。

目的和目标

调查由重症监护拓展团队实施“Sepsis Six”包对患者结局的影响。

设计

在一项前瞻性观察研究中,纳入了 2012 年 6 月至 2014 年 1 月期间所有在普通病房的成年脓毒症患者,这些患者由重症监护拓展团队进行筛查和治疗。

方法

主要观察指标是在 24 小时内实施 Sepsis Six 包后,国家早期预警评分的变化。次要结局指标为 90 天死亡率和整体捆绑依从性。

结果

共纳入 207 例患者进行分析。整体捆绑依从率为 84%。实施 Sepsis Six 后 24 小时,国家早期预警评分从 7.4±2.6 显著下降至 3.1±2.4(p<0.001)。国家早期预警评分的分布明显改变。在入院后 48 小时内出现脓毒症迹象的患者与入院后 48 小时后出现脓毒症迹象的患者相比,90 天死亡率更低(14.5%比 35.4%,p<0.03),尽管两组的基线生理变量相似。

结论

我们发现实施 Sepsis Six 后患者的结局更好。可以实现捆绑式治疗的可靠实施,定义为 80%的患者接受标准护理,我们的质量改进数据表明,在我们的环境中,这种捆绑式治疗可能是可持续的。

临床意义

Sepsis Six 可以通过国家早期预警评分监测来减轻生理损伤。捆绑式治疗的一致实施可以改善患者结局。

相似文献

1
Improving outcome of sepsis on the ward: introducing the 'Sepsis Six' bundle.改善病房中脓毒症的预后:引入“Sepsis Six”集束化治疗方案。
Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Jan;24(1):33-39. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12358. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
2
Four consecutive yearly point-prevalence studies in Wales indicate lack of improvement in sepsis care on the wards.威尔士连续 4 年进行的年度时点患病率研究表明,病房中脓毒症护理并未得到改善。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 10;11(1):16222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95648-6.
3
Characterising an implementation intervention in terms of behaviour change techniques and theory: the 'Sepsis Six' clinical care bundle.根据行为改变技术和理论对一项实施干预措施进行特征描述:“脓毒症六步法”临床护理集束。
Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 8;10:111. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0300-7.
4
The sepsis six and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: a prospective observational cohort study.脓毒症 6 小时集束化治疗和严重脓毒症复苏集束化治疗:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2011 Jun;28(6):507-12. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.095067. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
5
Bridging the gap between pragmatic intervention design and theory: using behavioural science tools to modify an existing quality improvement programme to implement "Sepsis Six".弥合实用干预设计与理论之间的差距:利用行为科学工具修改现有的质量改进计划以实施“脓毒症六步法”。
Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 3;11:14. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0376-8.
6
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
7
A complex endeavour: an ethnographic study of the implementation of the Sepsis Six clinical care bundle.一项复杂的工作:对脓毒症六联临床护理集束方案实施情况的人种志研究
Implement Sci. 2016 Nov 16;11(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0518-z.
8
Early recognition of sepsis through emergency medical services pre-hospital screening.通过急救医疗服务院前筛查早期识别脓毒症。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1428-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.036. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
9
Implementing the severe sepsis care bundles outside the ICU by outreach.通过外展服务在重症监护病房之外实施严重脓毒症护理集束化措施。
Nurs Crit Care. 2007 Sep-Oct;12(5):225-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2007.00242.x.
10
Evaluation of the Collaborative Use of an Evidence-Based Care Bundle in Emergency Laparotomy.评价基于循证的护理捆绑在急诊剖腹术中的联合应用。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):e190145. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0145. Epub 2019 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing the Sepsis Six Care Bundle (BLISS-1) Questionnaire.实施脓毒症“六步法”护理集束方案(BLISS - 1)问卷的障碍与促进因素的心理测量学特性
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 May 27;18:1761-1771. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S517386. eCollection 2025.
2
Antimicrobial stewardship and targeted therapies in the changing landscape of maternal sepsis.孕产妇脓毒症不断变化背景下的抗菌药物管理与靶向治疗
J Intensive Med. 2023 Sep 15;4(1):46-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.07.006. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Effects of ondansetron exposure during ICU stay on outcomes of critically ill patients with sepsis: a cohort study.
入住重症监护病房期间接受昂丹司琼治疗对脓毒症危重症患者结局的影响:一项队列研究。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Dec 21;13:1256382. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1256382. eCollection 2023.
4
Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet ratio in in-hospital mortality in septic patients.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及血小板比值对脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测价值
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 16;8(11):e11498. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11498. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
Sepsis outcomes in patients with pre-existing liver disease.患有基础肝病患者的脓毒症结局
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2021 Dec;7(4):358-363. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2021.111421. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
6
The Use of Different Sepsis Risk Stratification Tools on the Wards and in Emergency Departments Uncovers Different Mortality Risks: Results of the Three Welsh National Multicenter Point-Prevalence Studies.在病房和急诊科使用不同的脓毒症风险分层工具揭示了不同的死亡风险:三项威尔士全国多中心现况调查的结果
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Oct 21;3(10):e0558. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000558. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Four consecutive yearly point-prevalence studies in Wales indicate lack of improvement in sepsis care on the wards.威尔士连续 4 年进行的年度时点患病率研究表明,病房中脓毒症护理并未得到改善。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 10;11(1):16222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95648-6.
8
Real World Patterns of Antimicrobial Use and Microbiology Investigations in Patients with Sepsis outside the Critical Care Unit: Secondary Analysis of Three Nation-Wide Point Prevalence Studies.重症监护病房以外脓毒症患者抗菌药物使用及微生物学检查的真实世界模式:三项全国性现患率研究的二次分析
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 29;8(9):1337. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091337.
9
A Snapshot of Compliance with the Sepsis Six Care Bundle in Two Acute Hospitals in the West Midlands, UK.英国西米德兰兹郡两家急症医院对脓毒症“六件套”护理包的依从情况快照
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;23(7):310-315. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23204.
10
Red-flag sepsis and SOFA identifies different patient population at risk of sepsis-related deaths on the general ward.红色警示脓毒症和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在普通病房中识别出不同的脓毒症相关死亡风险患者群体。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(49):e13238. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013238.