Hu Yang, Qian Yue
Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Front Sociol. 2021 Jul 26;6:714626. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.714626. eCollection 2021.
Interacting with family members and friends from other households is a key part of everyday life and is crucial to people's mental well-being. The COVID-19 pandemic severely curtailed face-to-face contact between households, particularly for older adults (aged 60 and above), due to their high risk of developing severe illness if infected by COVID-19. In-person contact, where possible, was largely replaced by virtual interaction during the pandemic. This article examines how inter-household contact in face-to-face and virtual forms, as well as combinations of the two forms of contact, related to older adults' mental well-being during the pandemic. Data from two national longitudinal surveys, collected from the same respondents before (2018-2019) and during (June 2020) the pandemic, were comparatively analysed: the Health and Retirement Study in the US and Understanding Society in the UK. The findings showed a notable increase in loneliness in the US and a decline in general mental well-being in the UK following the outbreak of COVID-19. In both countries, more frequent inter-household face-to-face contact during the pandemic was associated with better general mental well-being, but inter-household virtual contact, via means such as telephone and digital media, was not associated with general mental well-being in either the US or the UK. In the US, older adults who engaged more frequently in virtual contact were more likely to feel lonely during the pandemic, particularly if their face-to-face contact was limited. In both countries, the increase in loneliness following the outbreak of the pandemic was greater for older adults who reported more virtual contact. The findings suggest that household-centred crisis management during the COVID-19 pandemic had unintended mental health implications in both the US and the UK, despite contextual differences between the two countries. Although face-to-face contact between households helped to sustain older adults' mental well-being, virtual contact was not a qualitatively equivalent alternative. The findings also provide an important evidence base for informing policy developments and for supporting the mental health of older people during the COVID-19 pandemic and in the longer term.
与来自其他家庭的家庭成员和朋友互动是日常生活的关键部分,对人们的心理健康至关重要。由于感染新冠病毒后患重病的风险较高,新冠疫情严重限制了家庭之间的面对面接触,尤其是对60岁及以上的老年人而言。在疫情期间,只要有可能,面对面接触在很大程度上被虚拟互动所取代。本文探讨了疫情期间家庭间面对面和虚拟形式的接触,以及这两种接触形式的组合,与老年人心理健康之间的关系。对来自美国的《健康与退休研究》和英国的《理解社会》这两项全国性纵向调查的数据进行了比较分析,这些数据是在疫情之前(2018 - 2019年)和期间(2020年6月)从相同的受访者那里收集的。研究结果显示,新冠疫情爆发后,美国的孤独感显著增加,英国的总体心理健康状况下降。在这两个国家,疫情期间更频繁的家庭间面对面接触与更好的总体心理健康状况相关,但通过电话和数字媒体等方式进行的家庭间虚拟接触,在美国和英国都与总体心理健康状况无关。在美国,在疫情期间更频繁进行虚拟接触的老年人更容易感到孤独,尤其是当他们的面对面接触有限时。在这两个国家,报告更多虚拟接触的老年人在疫情爆发后孤独感的增加幅度更大。研究结果表明,尽管美英两国存在背景差异,但新冠疫情期间以家庭为中心的危机管理对两国的心理健康都产生了意想不到的影响。虽然家庭间的面对面接触有助于维持老年人的心理健康,但虚拟接触并不是质量上等同的替代方式。这些研究结果还为为政策制定提供信息以及在新冠疫情期间及更长期支持老年人的心理健康提供了重要的证据基础。