Office for National Statistics, Newport, UK.
Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
J R Soc Med. 2021 Apr;114(4):182-211. doi: 10.1177/0141076821999973. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
To estimate the proportion of ethnic inequalities explained by living in a multi-generational household.
Causal mediation analysis.
Retrospective data from the 2011 Census linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (2017-2019) and death registration data (up to 30 November 2020).
Adults aged 65 years or over living in private households in England from 2 March 2020 until 30 November 2020 (n=10,078,568).
Hazard ratios were estimated for COVID-19 death for people living in a multi-generational household compared with people living with another older adult, adjusting for geographic factors, socioeconomic characteristics and pre-pandemic health.
Living in a multi-generational household was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 death. After adjusting for confounding factors, the hazard ratios for living in a multi-generational household with dependent children were 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.30) and 1.21 (95% CI 1.06-1.38) for elderly men and women. The hazard ratios for living in a multi-generational household without dependent children were 1.07 (95% CI 1.01-1.13) for elderly men and 1.17 (95% CI 1.07-1.25) for elderly women. Living in a multi-generational household explained about 11% of the elevated risk of COVID-19 death among elderly women from South Asian background, but very little for South Asian men or people in other ethnic minority groups.
Elderly adults living with younger people are at increased risk of COVID-19 mortality, and this is a contributing factor to the excess risk experienced by older South Asian women compared to White women. Relevant public health interventions should be directed at communities where such multi-generational households are highly prevalent.
估计多代同堂居住对族裔不平等现象的解释比例。
因果中介分析。
2020 年 3 月 2 日至 2020 年 11 月 30 日期间,从 2020 年 2021 年人口普查中提取的回顾性数据与医院病例统计数据(2017-2019 年)以及死亡登记数据(截至 2020 年 11 月 30 日)相关联。
2020 年 3 月 2 日至 2020 年 11 月 30 日期间居住在英格兰私人住宅中的 65 岁及以上成年人(n=10,078,568)。
与与另一位老年人同住的人相比,居住在多代同堂家庭中的人因 COVID-19 死亡的风险比,调整了地理因素、社会经济特征和大流行前的健康状况。
居住在多代同堂家庭与 COVID-19 死亡风险增加有关。在调整混杂因素后,与有依赖子女的多代同堂家庭相比,老年男性和女性的 COVID-19 死亡风险比为 1.17(95%置信区间[CI] 1.06-1.30)和 1.21(95%CI 1.06-1.38)。没有依赖子女的多代同堂家庭的老年男性和女性的 COVID-19 死亡风险比分别为 1.07(95%CI 1.01-1.13)和 1.17(95%CI 1.07-1.25)。多代同堂家庭解释了南亚裔老年女性 COVID-19 死亡率升高的约 11%,但对南亚裔男性或其他少数族裔群体的影响很小。
与年轻人同住的老年成年人患 COVID-19 死亡的风险增加,这是与白人女性相比,南亚裔老年女性经历的超额风险的一个促成因素。应针对多代同堂家庭高度流行的社区开展相关公共卫生干预措施。