Suppr超能文献

动物冲突的定量决策理论。

A quantitative decision theory of animal conflict.

作者信息

Wu Shuang, Jiang Libo, He Xiaoqing, Jin Yi, Griffin Christopher H, Wu Rongling

机构信息

Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, Center for Computational Biology, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing 100083, China.

Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):e07621. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07621. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Interactions between individuals are thought to shape evolution and speciation through natural selection, but little is known about how an individual (or player) strategically interacts with others to maximize its payoff. We develop a simple decision-theoretic model that generates four hypotheses about the choice of an optimal behavioral strategy by a player in response to the strategies of other players. The golden threshold hypothesis suggests that 62% is the critical threshold determining the transition of a larger player's strategy in reaction to its smaller dove-like partner. Below this critical point, the larger one exploits the smaller one, whereas above it, the larger one chooses to cooperate with the smaller one. The competition-to-cooperation shift hypothesis states that a larger player never cooperates with a smaller hawk-like player unless the former is reversely surpassed in size by the latter by 75%. The Fibonacci retracement mark hypothesis proposes that, faced with a larger dove-like player, a smaller player chooses to either cooperate or cheat, depending on whether its size relative to the larger player is less or more than 38%. The surrender-resistance hypothesis suggests that, in reaction to a larger hawk-like player, a smaller player can either gain some benefit from resistance or is sacrificed by choosing to surrender. We test these hypotheses by re-analyzing body mass data of full-sib fishes that were co-cultured in a common water pool. Pairwise analysis of these co-existing fishes broadly suggests the prediction of our hypotheses. Taken together, our model unveils detectable yet previously unknown quantitative mechanisms that mediate the strategic choice of animal behavior in populations or communities. Given the ubiquitous nature of biological interactions occurring at different levels of organizations and the paucity of quantitative approaches to understand them, results by our decision-theoretic model represent an initial step towards the deeper understanding of how biological entities interact with each other to drive their evolution.

摘要

个体之间的相互作用被认为通过自然选择塑造了进化和物种形成,但对于个体(或参与者)如何通过策略性地与其他个体互动以实现自身收益最大化,我们却知之甚少。我们开发了一个简单的决策理论模型,该模型针对参与者如何根据其他参与者的策略选择最优行为策略提出了四个假设。黄金阈值假设表明,62%是决定较大参与者针对其较小的鸽派伙伴策略转变的关键阈值。低于这个临界点时,较大的参与者会剥削较小的参与者,而高于这个临界点时,较大的参与者会选择与较小的参与者合作。竞争到合作的转变假设指出,较大的参与者永远不会与较小的鹰派参与者合作,除非前者在体型上被后者反向超越75%。斐波那契回撤标记假设提出,面对较大的鸽派参与者时,较小的参与者会根据其相对于较大参与者的体型是小于还是大于38%来选择合作或欺骗。投降 - 抵抗假设表明,面对较大的鹰派参与者时,较小的参与者可以通过抵抗获得一些好处,或者因选择投降而被牺牲。我们通过重新分析在同一个水池中共培养的全同胞鱼类的体重数据来检验这些假设。对这些共存鱼类的成对分析大致支持了我们假设的预测。综上所述,我们的模型揭示了可检测但此前未知的定量机制,这些机制介导了种群或群落中动物行为的策略选择。鉴于生物相互作用在不同组织层次上普遍存在,且缺乏定量方法来理解它们,我们的决策理论模型所得出的结果代表了朝着更深入理解生物实体如何相互作用以推动其进化迈出的第一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c6/8339242/93b159e356c1/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验