Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
S Afr Med J. 2021 Apr 6;111(6):550-553.
The hyperinflammation seen as part of a dysregulated immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in its most severe form leads to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiorgan failure and death. Corticosteroid therapy targets this hyperinflammation, otherwise known as a cytokine storm. It is the only therapeutic agent to date with a mortality benefit, with clear guidelines from national and international health authorities guiding its use. Objectives. To compare severity-of-illness indices, survival, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and potential ICU complications in patients treated with different corticosteroid regimens (high-dose hydrocortisone, high-dose methylprednisolone and lower-dose dexamethasone). Methods. In this single-centre descriptive retrospective observational study of a cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to a COVID-dedicated ICU, we compared patients treated with the three different corticosteroid regimens. Results. In 242 cases we could not demonstrate any statistically or clinically significant difference in the outcome of patients with critical COVID-19 treated with high-dose intravenous hydrocortisone (n=88) or methylprednisolone (n=46) compared with a relatively lower dose of dexamethasone (n=108). The survival rates were 38.6%, 39.1% and 33.3%, respectively (p=0.68). Patients treated with methylprednisolone tended to have a shorter length of ICU stay (median (interquartile range) 6 (4 - 10), 4 (2 - 8) and 5 (2 - 8) days; p=0.015) and fewer episodes of nosocomial sepsis (47.7%, 32.6% and 48.1%; p=0.01). Conclusions. Hydrocortisone or methylprednisolone can be given as an alternative to dexamethasone in the management of critical COVID-19, and this is a feasible alternative, especially in resource-constrained settings.
作为对严重形式的 SARS-CoV-2 免疫反应失调的一部分,过度炎症会导致急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)、多器官衰竭和死亡。皮质类固醇疗法针对这种过度炎症,也称为细胞因子风暴。它是迄今为止唯一具有降低死亡率的治疗药物,国家和国际卫生当局有明确的使用指南。
比较不同皮质类固醇治疗方案(大剂量氢化可的松、大剂量甲泼尼龙和低剂量地塞米松)治疗的严重 COVID-19 患者的疾病严重程度指数、生存率、重症监护病房(ICU)停留时间和潜在 ICU 并发症。
在一项对 COVID-19 专用 ICU 收治的严重 COVID-19 患者的单中心描述性回顾性观察研究中,我们比较了接受三种不同皮质类固醇治疗方案的患者。
在 242 例患者中,我们无法证明接受大剂量静脉注射氢化可的松(n=88)或甲泼尼龙(n=46)治疗的危重症 COVID-19 患者与接受相对较低剂量地塞米松(n=108)治疗的患者的结局有任何统计学或临床显著差异。生存率分别为 38.6%、39.1%和 33.3%(p=0.68)。接受甲泼尼龙治疗的患者 ICU 停留时间较短(中位数(四分位距)6(4-10)、4(2-8)和 5(2-8)天;p=0.015),医院获得性败血症发作次数较少(47.7%、32.6%和 48.1%;p=0.01)。
在治疗危重症 COVID-19 时,氢化可的松或甲泼尼龙可以替代地塞米松,这是一种可行的替代方案,尤其是在资源有限的情况下。