Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger Street, Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3855-3864. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13539. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is characterized by sub-clinical inflammation. Changes in selected biomarkers of inflammation concomitant with the release of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines by neutrophils have not been investigated in patients with HFrEF.
Fifty-two patients, aged 68.8 ± 1.7 years, with HFrEF and left ventricular ejection fraction 28.7 ± 1.0%, and 21 healthy controls (CTL) were recruited. Twenty-five HF patients had type 2 diabetes. Venous blood samples from HF and CTL were collected once. Neutrophil-derived pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine levels were assessed in plasma by ELISA. Plasma biomarkers assessed included: C-reactive protein (CRP), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukins (IL)-6, -8, -1 receptor antagonist (-1RA), nitric oxide (NO), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1) and E-Selectin (sE-Sel). Neutrophils were isolated and stimulated with various agonists to promote VEGF, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1RA release. Compared with CTL, HFrEF patients showed a marked decrease in circulating VEGF [178.0 (interquartile range; IQR 99.6; 239.2) vs. 16.2 (IQR 9.3; 20.2) pg/mL, P ≤ 0.001] and NO [45.2 (IQR 42.1; 57.6) vs. 40.6 (IQR 30.4; 47.1) pg/mL, P = 0.0234]. All other circulating biomarkers were significantly elevated. Neutrophils isolated from patients with HFrEF exhibited a greater IL-8 release in response to LPS [1.2 ± 0.1 (CTL); 10.4 ± 1.6 ng/mL (HFrEF) and 12.4 ± 1.6 ng/mL (HFrEF and DM), P ≤ 0.001]. IL-6 release in response to LPS was not changed in HFrEF patients without diabetes, whereas it was significantly increased in patients with HFrEF and diabetes [46.7 ± 3.9 (CTL) vs. 165.8 ± 48.0 pg/mL (HFrEF), P = 0.1713 and vs. 397.7 ± 67.4 pg/mL (HFrEF and DM), P ≤ 0.001]. In contrast, the release of VEGF and IL-1RA was significantly reduced in HFrEF (VEGF; TNF-α: 38.6 ± 3.1 and LPS: 25.3 ± 2.6 pg/mL; IL1RA; TNF-α: 0.6 ± 0.04 and LPS: 0.3 ± 0.02 ng/mL) compared with CTL (VEGF; TNF-α: 60.0 ± 9.4 and LPS: 41.2 ± 5.9 pg/mL; IL1RA; TNF-α: 3.3 ± 0.2 and LPS: 2.3 ± 0.1 ng/mL).
Patients with HFrEF exhibit a significant decrease in circulating VEGF. The release of VEGF and both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines from the stimulated neutrophils is markedly altered in these patients. The clinical significance of these findings deserves further investigation.
射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)的特征是亚临床炎症。尚未研究 HFrEF 患者中性粒细胞伴随炎症的选择生物标志物的变化以及促炎和抗炎细胞因子的释放。
招募了 52 名年龄为 68.8±1.7 岁的 HFrEF 患者和左心室射血分数 28.7±1.0%患者,以及 21 名健康对照者(CTL)。25 名 HF 患者患有 2 型糖尿病。从 HF 和 CTL 采集一次静脉血样。通过 ELISA 评估血浆中中性粒细胞衍生的促炎和抗炎细胞因子水平。评估的血浆生物标志物包括:C-反应蛋白(CRP)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、白细胞介素(IL)-6、-8、-1 受体拮抗剂(-1RA)、一氧化氮(NO)、可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1(sICAM-1)、血管细胞黏附分子 1(sVCAM-1)和 E-选择素(sE-Sel)。分离中性粒细胞并用各种激动剂刺激以促进 VEGF、IL-6、IL-8 和 IL-1RA 的释放。与 CTL 相比,HFrEF 患者的循环 VEGF 明显降低[178.0(四分位距;IQR 99.6;239.2)与 16.2(IQR 9.3;20.2)pg/mL,P≤0.001]和 NO[45.2(IQR 42.1;57.6)与 40.6(IQR 30.4;47.1)pg/mL,P=0.0234]。所有其他循环生物标志物均显著升高。从 HFrEF 患者中分离出的中性粒细胞在 LPS 刺激下表现出更大的 IL-8 释放[1.2±0.1(CTL);10.4±1.6ng/mL(HFrEF)和 12.4±1.6ng/mL(HFrEF 和 DM),P≤0.001]。未患有糖尿病的 HFrEF 患者对 LPS 的 IL-6 释放没有变化,而患有糖尿病的 HFrEF 患者则明显增加[46.7±3.9(CTL)与 165.8±48.0pg/mL(HFrEF),P=0.1713 和 397.7±67.4pg/mL(HFrEF 和 DM),P≤0.001]。相比之下,HFrEF 中 VEGF 和 IL-1RA 的释放明显减少(VEGF;TNF-α:38.6±3.1 和 LPS:25.3±2.6pg/mL;IL1RA;TNF-α:0.6±0.04 和 LPS:0.3±0.02ng/mL)与 CTL(VEGF;TNF-α:60.0±9.4 和 LPS:41.2±5.9pg/mL;IL1RA;TNF-α:3.3±0.2 和 LPS:2.3±0.1ng/mL)。
HFrEF 患者表现出循环 VEGF 的显著降低。这些患者中性粒细胞刺激后 VEGF 和促炎及抗炎细胞因子的释放明显改变。这些发现的临床意义值得进一步研究。