UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Aug;18(6):963-973. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1958932. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
The development of Brain-Computer Interfaces to restore communication (cBCIs) in people with severe motor impairment ideally relies on a close collaboration between end-users and other stakeholders, such as caregivers and researchers. Awareness about potential differences in opinion between these groups is crucial for development of usable cBCIs and access technology (AT) in general. In this study, we compared the opinions of prospective cBCI users, their caregivers and cBCI researchers regarding: (1) what applications would users like to control with a cBCI; (2) what mental strategies would users prefer to use for cBCI control; and (3) at what stage of their clinical trajectory would users like to be informed about AT and cBCIs.
We collected data from 28 individuals with locked-in syndrome, 29 of their caregivers and 28 cBCI researchers. The questionnaire was supported with animation videos to explain different cBCI concepts, the utility of which was also assessed.
Opinions of the three groups were aligned with respect to the most desired cBCI applications, but diverged regarding mental strategies and the timing of being informed about cBCIs. Animation videos were regarded as clear and useful tools to explain cBCIs and mental strategies to end-users and other stakeholders.
Disagreements were clear between stakeholders regarding which mental strategies users prefer to use and when they would like to be informed about cBCIs. To move forward in the development and clinical implementation of cBCIs, it will be necessary to align the research agendas with the needs of the end-users and caregivers.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONBrain-Computer Interfaces may offer people with severe motor impairment a brain-based and muscle-independent approach to control communication-technology. The successful development of communication BCIs (cBCIs) relies on a close collaboration between end-users and other stakeholders, such as caregivers and researchers.Our work reveals that people with locked-in syndrome (end-users), their caregivers and researchers developing cBCIs agree that direct and private forms of communication are the most desired cBCI applications, but disagree regarding the preferred mental strategies for cBCI control and when to be informed about cBCIs.Animation videos are an effective tool for providing information to individuals, independent of their level of health literacy, regarding the concept of cBCIs and mental strategies for control.The misalignment in opinions of different groups of stakeholders about cBCIs strengthens the argument for a user-centered design approach in the development of cBCIs and access technology designed for daily life usage.
为了开发能够恢复严重运动障碍患者交流能力的脑机接口(cBCI),理想情况下需要终端用户及其它利益相关者(如护理人员和研究人员)之间密切合作。了解这些群体之间潜在的意见差异,对于开发可用的 cBCI 和通用的辅助技术(AT)至关重要。在这项研究中,我们比较了有希望使用 cBCI 的患者、他们的护理人员和 cBCI 研究人员对以下问题的看法:(1)患者希望使用 cBCI 来控制哪些应用;(2)患者希望使用哪些心理策略来控制 cBCI;(3)患者希望在临床轨迹的哪个阶段了解 AT 和 cBCI。
我们收集了 28 名闭锁综合征患者、29 名护理人员和 28 名 cBCI 研究人员的数据。问卷还附有动画视频,以解释不同的 cBCI 概念,同时评估了这些视频的有用性。
三组人员在最期望的 cBCI 应用方面的意见一致,但在心理策略和了解 cBCI 的时间方面存在分歧。动画视频被认为是向终端用户和其它利益相关者解释 cBCI 和心理策略的清晰而有用的工具。
利益相关者之间在患者偏好的心理策略以及他们希望何时了解 cBCI 方面存在明显分歧。为了在 cBCI 的开发和临床实施方面取得进展,有必要使研究议程与终端用户和护理人员的需求保持一致。
脑机接口为严重运动障碍患者提供了一种基于大脑和肌肉独立的通信技术。成功开发通信脑机接口(cBCI)依赖于终端用户和其他利益相关者(如护理人员和研究人员)之间的密切合作。我们的工作表明,闭锁综合征患者(终端用户)、他们的护理人员和开发 cBCI 的研究人员都认为直接和私密的交流形式是最期望的 cBCI 应用,但在 cBCI 控制的首选心理策略和何时了解 cBCI 方面存在分歧。动画视频是为个人提供有关 cBCI 概念和控制心理策略的信息的有效工具,无论他们的健康素养水平如何。不同利益相关者群体对 cBCI 的意见不一致,这进一步证明了在开发 cBCI 和为日常生活设计的辅助技术时采用以用户为中心的设计方法的合理性。