Suppr超能文献

通过临床推理的“如何”来增强药师患者护理过程的“什么”和“为什么”。

Enhancing the "What" and "Why" of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process With the "How" of Clinical Reasoning.

机构信息

Mercer University, College of Pharmacy, Atlanta, Georgia

Mercer University, College of Pharmacy, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Apr;86(4):8697. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8697. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

Abstract

Clinical reasoning is integral to the provision of patient-centered care as outlined in the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process (PPCP). However, the PPCP was not created to foster clinical reasoning in student pharmacists and cannot be the sole tool used to characterize or cultivate these skills. This article describes elements of clinical reasoning, the relationship between clinical reasoning and PPCP, and concepts from the clinical reasoning literature that should inform the teaching of clinical reasoning skills. Key elements of the PPCP were identified in clinical reasoning definitions, but differences emerged. The literature supports clinical reasoning as a bidirectional, fluid process that is highly collaborative. Effective clinical reasoning requires multiple types of "thinking," interaction with others and the environment, self-assessment, and a tolerance for nuance or ambiguity. Teaching strategies can be used in the didactic and experiential setting to target the cognitive and contextual factors associated with clinical reasoning. Educators should consult the literature to enhance our understanding of clinical reasoning in seeking to teach, model, and foster these skills in our students. Future scholarship should include the development of models to support clinical reasoning within the profession of pharmacy, adoption and experimentation with clinical reasoning teaching techniques, and valuation of the utility of various assessment tools and processes.

摘要

临床推理是患者为中心的护理提供的必要组成部分,正如药剂师患者护理流程(PPCP)所概述的那样。然而,PPCP 的创建并不是为了培养学生药剂师的临床推理能力,也不能成为唯一用于描述或培养这些技能的工具。本文描述了临床推理的要素、临床推理与 PPCP 之间的关系,以及临床推理文献中的概念,这些都应该为临床推理技能的教学提供信息。PPCP 的关键要素在临床推理定义中被识别出来,但也存在差异。文献支持临床推理是一个双向、流畅的过程,高度协作。有效的临床推理需要多种类型的“思维”,与他人和环境的互动,自我评估,以及对细微差别或模糊性的容忍度。教学策略可以在理论和实践教学环境中使用,以针对与临床推理相关的认知和背景因素。教育工作者应该查阅文献,加深对临床推理的理解,以便在教学中寻求教授、模拟和培养学生的这些技能。未来的学术研究应包括开发支持药学专业临床推理的模型,采用和实验临床推理教学技术,以及评估各种评估工具和流程的实用性。

相似文献

1
Enhancing the "What" and "Why" of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process With the "How" of Clinical Reasoning.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Apr;86(4):8697. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8697. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
2
A Deeper Reflection on the Integration of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Aug;88(8):100726. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100726. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
This is how I think: Evaluation of a preceptor development webinar on incorporating the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process into experiential teaching.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Nov;11(11):1132-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Implementation of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process in a Medicinal Chemistry Course.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Feb;84(2):7556. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7556.
6
Development of a scale to determine student self-efficacy in performing key pharmacists' patient care skills.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Mar;18(3):2489-2494. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
7
Curricular integration of the pharmacists' patient care process.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Sep;13(9):1153-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.06.035. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
8
9
Inclusion of the Pharmacist Patient Care Process in Doctor of Pharmacy Curricula.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Aug;85(7):8513. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8513. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Incorporating the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process Into An Interprofessional Second Year Capstone.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Jan;12(1):41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the effect of a new clinical reasoning curriculum in a pre-clerkship clinical skills course.
Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Apr;9(2):123-127. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00566-4.
2
A lesson in clinical reasoning for the pharmacy preceptor.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jun 18;76(13):944-951. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz083.
3
The terminology of clinical reasoning in health professions education: Implications and considerations.
Med Teach. 2019 Nov;41(11):1277-1284. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1635686. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
4
Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Pharmacy Students.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Mar;83(2):7033. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7033.
5
Clinical reasoning as a threshold skill.
Med Teach. 2019 Jun;41(6):683-689. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1569754. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
6
Twelve tips for thriving in the face of clinical uncertainty.
Med Teach. 2020 May;42(5):493-499. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1579308. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
7
Clinical Reasoning Assessment Methods: A Scoping Review and Practical Guidance.
Acad Med. 2019 Jun;94(6):902-912. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002618.
8
Clinical decision-making: An essential skill for 21st century pharmacy practice.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 May;15(5):600-606. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
9
How Different Theories of Clinical Reasoning Influence Teaching and Assessment.
Acad Med. 2018 Sep;93(9):1415. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002303.
10
Crystallizations of constructs : Lessons learned from a literature review.
Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Jun;7(Suppl 1):21-23. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0422-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验