Suppr超能文献

培养药学学生的批判性思维能力。

Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Pharmacy Students.

机构信息

Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Associate Editor, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Mar;83(2):7033. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7033.

Abstract

To review the importance of and barriers to critical thinking and provide evidence-based recommendations to encourage development of these skills in pharmacy students. Critical thinking (CT) is one of the most desired skills of a pharmacy graduate but there are many challenges to students thinking critically including their own perceptions, poor metacognitive skills, a fixed mindset, a non-automated skillset, heuristics, biases and the fact that thinking is effortful. Though difficult, developing CT skills is not impossible. Research and practice suggest several factors that can improve one's thinking ability: a thoughtful learning environment, seeing or hearing what is done to executive cognitive operations that students can emulate, and guidance and support of their efforts until they can perform on their own. Teaching CT requires coordination at the curricular level and further to the more discrete level of a lesson and a course. Instructor training is imperative to this process since this intervention has been found to be the most effective in developing CT skills.

摘要

回顾批判性思维的重要性和障碍,并提供循证建议,以鼓励药学学生发展这些技能。批判性思维(CT)是药学毕业生最需要的技能之一,但学生批判性思维存在许多挑战,包括他们自己的认知、元认知技能差、固定思维模式、非自动化技能、启发式、偏见以及思维费力的事实。尽管困难重重,但培养 CT 技能并非不可能。研究和实践表明,有几个因素可以提高一个人的思维能力:深思熟虑的学习环境、观察或听到学生可以模仿的执行认知操作,以及对他们努力的指导和支持,直到他们能够独立完成。教授 CT 需要在课程层面上进行协调,并且进一步需要在课程和课程的更离散层面上进行协调。教师培训对于这个过程至关重要,因为这种干预措施被发现是培养 CT 技能最有效的方法。

相似文献

1
Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Pharmacy Students.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Mar;83(2):7033. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7033.
4
Reflective practice and its implications for pharmacy education.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Feb 12;78(1):18. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78118.
5
Self-authorship in pharmacy education.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):69. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77469.
6
Are fishbowl activities effective for teaching pharmacotherapy and developing postformal thought in pharmacy students? A pilot study.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Aug;10(8):1070-1075. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
8
Integration of pharmacy students within a level II trauma center.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Aug 10;75(6):121. doi: 10.5688/ajpe756121.
9
Team-based learning in pharmacy education.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):70. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77470.
10
Students' perceptions of a blended learning pharmacy seminar course in a Caribbean school of pharmacy.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Apr;10(4):517-522. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

7
Teachers' perspectives on teaching science through an argumentation-driven inquiry model: A mixed-methods study.
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 1;9(9):e19739. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19739. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Teaching Independent Decision-Making Through a Computer-Based Drug Utilization Review Simulation.
J Pharm Technol. 2023 Aug;39(4):164-171. doi: 10.1177/87551225231179327. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
10
A model to facilitate critical thinking of radiography students.
J Med Radiat Sci. 2023 Dec;70(4):369-379. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.697. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Moving from Novice to Expertise and Its Implications for Instruction.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Nov;81(9):6065. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6065.
2
Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Acute Cough Associated With the Common Cold: CHEST Expert Panel Report.
Chest. 2017 Nov;152(5):1021-1037. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
3
Strategies for Improving Learner Metacognition in Health Professional Education.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 May;81(4):78. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81478.
5
The fact of ignorance: revisiting the Socratic method as a tool for teaching critical thinking.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Sep 15;78(7):144. doi: 10.5688/ajpe787144.
6
Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Oct 14;77(8):162. doi: 10.5688/ajpe778162.
7
Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy fools.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):269-73. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0384-5.
8
Clinical reasoning - a guide to improving teaching and practice.
Aust Fam Physician. 2012 Jan-Feb;41(1-2):18-20.
10
Heuristic decision making.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:451-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验