Suppr超能文献

基于正念减压对自主内感受信号与情绪调节选择之间关联的影响。

The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on the Association Between Autonomic Interoceptive Signals and Emotion Regulation Selection.

作者信息

Ardi Ziv, Golland Yulia, Shafir Roni, Sheppes Gal, Levit-Binnun Nava

机构信息

From the Sagol Center for Brain and Mind, Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya (Ardi, Golland, Levit-Binnun), Herzliya; Department of Behavioral Sciences (Ardi), Kinneret Academic College, Sea of Galilee; and The School of Psychological Sciences and Sagol School of Neuroscience (Shafir, Sheppes), Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 2021 Oct 1;83(8):852-862. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000994.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The ability to select the most adaptive regulatory strategy as a function of the emotional context plays a pivotal role in psychological health. Recently, we showed that mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) can improve the sensitivity of regulatory strategy selection to emotional intensity. However, the mechanisms underlying this improvement are unclear. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that MBIs support adaptive regulatory selection by increasing sensitivity to interoceptive signals associated with the emotional stimuli.

METHODS

Participants (n = 84, mean [standard deviation {SD}] age = 30.9 [8.3] years; 54% women) were randomized to either a mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program or a wait-list control condition. Before and after the MBSR program, physiological measures for autonomic nervous system activity were obtained, and participants performed a task examining emotion regulation selections (reappraisal versus distraction) when confronted with low or high negative intensity images. They also completed a battery of mindfulness, interoception, and well-being self-report measures. A cross-classified model was used for the main analyses.

RESULTS

The participants assigned to the MBSR were overall more likely to choose reappraisal than distraction (b = 0.26, posterior SD = 0.13, 95confidence interval = 0.02-0.52) after the program. Interoceptive signals in response to negative images were associated with subsequent regulatory selections (b = 0.02, posterior SD = 0.01, 95% confidence interval = 0.01-0.03) in the MBSR group. Specifically, lower cardiac reactivity was associated with the choice to reappraise, whereas higher cardiac reactivity was related to the choice to distract. Greater differences in cardiac reactivity between states that prompt reappraisal and states that prompt distraction were associated with higher well-being (Satisfaction With Life Scale, Pearson r (29) = 0.527, p = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Mindfulness seems to increase the sensitivity of regulatory selections to interoceptive signals, and this is associated with subjective well-being. This may be a central pathway through which MBIs exert their positive effects on mental health and resilience.

摘要

目的

根据情绪背景选择最具适应性的调节策略的能力在心理健康中起着关键作用。最近,我们发现基于正念的干预措施(MBIs)可以提高调节策略选择对情绪强度的敏感性。然而,这种改善背后的机制尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们检验了以下假设:MBIs通过提高对与情绪刺激相关的内感受信号的敏感性来支持适应性调节选择。

方法

参与者(n = 84,平均[标准差{SD}]年龄 = 30.9 [8.3]岁;54%为女性)被随机分为基于正念的减压(MBSR)计划组或等待名单对照组。在MBSR计划前后,获取自主神经系统活动的生理测量数据,参与者执行一项任务,检查面对低或高负性强度图像时的情绪调节选择(重新评价与分心)。他们还完成了一系列关于正念、内感受和幸福感的自我报告测量。主要分析采用交叉分类模型。

结果

分配到MBSR组的参与者在计划后总体上比选择分心更倾向于选择重新评价(b = 0.26,后验标准差 = 0.13,95%置信区间 = 0.02 - 0.52)。在MBSR组中,对负性图像的内感受信号与随后的调节选择相关(b = 0.02,后验标准差 = 0.01,95%置信区间 = 0.01 - 0.03)。具体而言,较低的心脏反应性与重新评价的选择相关,而较高的心脏反应性与分心的选择相关。促使重新评价和促使分心的状态之间心脏反应性的更大差异与更高的幸福感相关(生活满意度量表,Pearson r(29) = 0.527,p = 0.003)。

结论

正念似乎提高了调节选择对内感受信号的敏感性,这与主观幸福感相关。这可能是MBIs对心理健康和恢复力产生积极影响的核心途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验