Suppr超能文献

哮喘患者对高渗盐水和乙酰甲胆碱的支气管反应比较

Comparative bronchial responses to hyperosmolar saline and methacholine in asthma.

作者信息

Boulet L P, Legris C, Thibault L, Turcotte H

机构信息

Centre de Pneumologie, Hôpital Laval, Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Thorax. 1987 Dec;42(12):953-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.42.12.953.

Abstract

Airway responsiveness to inhaled methacholine and to ultrasonically nebulised hyperosmolar saline was compared in 20 asthmatic subjects. Each subject had two hyperosmolar inhalation tests and a methacholine challenge in random order at least 48 hours apart over a period of two weeks. Hyperosmolar challenge, carried out with doubling concentrations of saline from 0.9% to 14.4% to obtain a dose-response curve, was well tolerated by all subjects. The response to hyperosmolar saline--expressed as the PO20, the osmolarity inducing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was obtained in 16 of the 20 subjects and in each was repeatable to within one doubling concentration of saline. The peak bronchoconstrictor effect of hyperosmolar saline inhalation occurred at 3 minutes and its mean total duration (FEV1 less than 90% of baseline) was 50 minutes. There was no significant correlation between the PO20 and the PC20 methacholine (the concentration inducing a 20% fall in FEV1). Thus by using a new method to obtain a quantitative airway response to inhaled hyperosmolar saline we found that the airway response to hyperosmolar inhalation differs from the airway response to methacholine.

摘要

在20名哮喘患者中比较了气道对吸入乙酰甲胆碱和超声雾化高渗盐水的反应性。在两周时间内,每位患者至少间隔48小时,以随机顺序进行两次高渗吸入试验和一次乙酰甲胆碱激发试验。用从0.9%至14.4%浓度加倍的盐水进行高渗激发试验以获得剂量反应曲线,所有患者对该试验耐受性良好。20名患者中有16名获得了对高渗盐水的反应——以PO20表示,即诱导一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)下降20%的渗透压,并且每位患者的结果在盐水浓度加倍范围内可重复。吸入高渗盐水的最大支气管收缩效应出现在3分钟时,其平均总持续时间(FEV1低于基线的90%)为50分钟。PO20与乙酰甲胆碱PC20(诱导FEV1下降20%的浓度)之间无显著相关性。因此,通过使用一种新方法来获得气道对吸入高渗盐水的定量反应,我们发现气道对高渗吸入的反应不同于对乙酰甲胆碱的气道反应。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Acute and chronic respiratory effects of sodium borate particulate exposures.硼酸钠颗粒物暴露的急性和慢性呼吸影响。
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Nov;102 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):119-28. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102s7119.

本文引用的文献

6
Is there a unifying hypothesis for exercise-induced asthma?对于运动诱发的哮喘,是否存在一个统一的假说?
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984 May;73(5 Pt 2):660-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(84)90301-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验