Anderson S D
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984 May;73(5 Pt 2):660-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(84)90301-4.
We believe that it is the loss of water per se and not heat loss that is the most important stimulus to exercise-induced asthma (EIA). The evidence to support this concept comes from a number of observations. First, EIA may occur when expired air temperature during exercise is close to body temperature and higher than that normally observed at rest. This suggests that EIA is not always associated with cooling of the airways. Second, there is evidence to show that the temperature of the inspired air is less critical than was previously thought. Providing that the water loss is the same, the airway response is reproducible even though the heat loss may vary because of differences in the temperature of the inspired air. Because expired water concentration is relatively constant, the airway response relates well to the water concentration of the inspired air. We believe that evaporative water loss from the airway mucosa induces a transient change in osmolarity in the epithelial fluid and that this change is a more potent stimulus to bronchoconstriction than is airway cooling. We believe this hypothesis accounts for many known facts about EIA and should merit further investigation by which it may be proved or disproved.
我们认为,对于运动诱发哮喘(EIA)而言,最重要的刺激因素是水分本身的流失,而非热量损失。支持这一概念的证据来自多项观察结果。首先,当运动期间呼出空气的温度接近体温且高于静息时通常观察到的温度时,可能会发生运动诱发哮喘。这表明运动诱发哮喘并不总是与气道冷却相关。其次,有证据表明,吸入空气的温度不像以前认为的那么关键。只要水分流失相同,即使由于吸入空气温度的差异导致热量损失有所不同,气道反应仍是可重复的。由于呼出水分浓度相对恒定,气道反应与吸入空气的水分浓度密切相关。我们认为,气道黏膜的蒸发水分流失会导致上皮液渗透压发生短暂变化,并且这种变化对支气管收缩的刺激比气道冷却更强。我们相信这一假说解释了许多关于运动诱发哮喘的已知事实,值得进一步研究以证实或证伪。