Suppr超能文献

评估回溯生育日历的可靠性:来自肯尼亚城市的证据。

Assessing the Reliability of the Retrospective Reproductive Calendar: Evidence from Urban Kenya.

机构信息

Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

Stud Fam Plann. 2021 Dec;52(4):467-486. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12173. Epub 2021 Aug 14.

Abstract

The reproductive calendar is a data collection tool that collects month-by-month retrospective histories of contraceptive use. This survey instrument is implemented in large-scale demographic surveys, but its reliability is not well-understood. Our analysis helps to address this research gap, using longitudinal panel data with overlapping calendars from urban Kenya. Our findings indicate calendar data collected in 2014 underestimated 2012 reports of current use by 5 percentage points. And while the overall percentage of women reporting at least one episode of contraceptive use was similar across the two calendars (67 percent vs. 70 percent), there was notable disagreement in contraceptive behavior when comparing the histories of individual women; less than 20 percent of women with any contraceptive use reported the exact same pattern of use in both calendars. Low calendar reliability was especially apparent for younger women and those with complicated contraceptive histories. Individual-level discordance resulted in a small difference in 12-month discontinuation rates for the period of calendar overlap; when surveyed in 2014, women reported a 12-month discontinuation rate of 39 percent, compared to a rate of 34 percent reported in 2012. When using retrospective calendar data, attention must be paid to the potential for individual reporting errors.

摘要

生育日历是一种数据收集工具,用于逐月回顾避孕措施的使用情况。这种调查工具在大规模人口调查中实施,但它的可靠性尚未得到很好的理解。我们的分析有助于解决这一研究空白,使用肯尼亚城市的具有重叠生育日历的纵向面板数据。我们的研究结果表明,2014 年收集的日历数据低估了 2012 年当前使用情况的 5 个百分点。虽然两个日历中报告至少有一次避孕使用的女性总体比例相似(67%对 70%),但比较个别女性的避孕行为历史时存在明显的不一致;不到 20%有任何避孕使用的女性在两个日历中报告了完全相同的使用模式。生育日历的可靠性较低,在年轻女性和避孕史复杂的女性中尤为明显。个体层面的不一致导致日历重叠期间 12 个月停药率的微小差异;在 2014 年接受调查时,女性报告的 12 个月停药率为 39%,而 2012 年报告的停药率为 34%。在使用回顾性日历数据时,必须注意个人报告错误的可能性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Differential discontinuation by covert use status in Kenya.肯尼亚按秘密使用状况进行的差异停药情况。
Contracept X. 2023 Oct 16;5:100102. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100102. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Reducing unmet need by supporting women with met need.通过满足有需求的女性来减少未满足的需求。
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013 Sep;39(3):133-41. doi: 10.1363/3913313.
4
Contraception and health.避孕与健康。
Lancet. 2012 Jul 14;380(9837):149-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60609-6. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
7
Family planning: the unfinished agenda.计划生育:未竟议程。
Lancet. 2006 Nov 18;368(9549):1810-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69480-4.
8
Adolescent pregnancy: current trends and issues.青少年怀孕:当前趋势与问题
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):281-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0999.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验