Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Chapel Hill, NC.
Stud Fam Plann. 2021 Dec;52(4):467-486. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12173. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
The reproductive calendar is a data collection tool that collects month-by-month retrospective histories of contraceptive use. This survey instrument is implemented in large-scale demographic surveys, but its reliability is not well-understood. Our analysis helps to address this research gap, using longitudinal panel data with overlapping calendars from urban Kenya. Our findings indicate calendar data collected in 2014 underestimated 2012 reports of current use by 5 percentage points. And while the overall percentage of women reporting at least one episode of contraceptive use was similar across the two calendars (67 percent vs. 70 percent), there was notable disagreement in contraceptive behavior when comparing the histories of individual women; less than 20 percent of women with any contraceptive use reported the exact same pattern of use in both calendars. Low calendar reliability was especially apparent for younger women and those with complicated contraceptive histories. Individual-level discordance resulted in a small difference in 12-month discontinuation rates for the period of calendar overlap; when surveyed in 2014, women reported a 12-month discontinuation rate of 39 percent, compared to a rate of 34 percent reported in 2012. When using retrospective calendar data, attention must be paid to the potential for individual reporting errors.
生育日历是一种数据收集工具,用于逐月回顾避孕措施的使用情况。这种调查工具在大规模人口调查中实施,但它的可靠性尚未得到很好的理解。我们的分析有助于解决这一研究空白,使用肯尼亚城市的具有重叠生育日历的纵向面板数据。我们的研究结果表明,2014 年收集的日历数据低估了 2012 年当前使用情况的 5 个百分点。虽然两个日历中报告至少有一次避孕使用的女性总体比例相似(67%对 70%),但比较个别女性的避孕行为历史时存在明显的不一致;不到 20%有任何避孕使用的女性在两个日历中报告了完全相同的使用模式。生育日历的可靠性较低,在年轻女性和避孕史复杂的女性中尤为明显。个体层面的不一致导致日历重叠期间 12 个月停药率的微小差异;在 2014 年接受调查时,女性报告的 12 个月停药率为 39%,而 2012 年报告的停药率为 34%。在使用回顾性日历数据时,必须注意个人报告错误的可能性。