• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科口罩微生物过滤效率的研究——特别提及无纺布口罩

A study on the microbial filtration efficiency of surgical face masks--with special reference to the non-woven fabric mask.

作者信息

Furuhashi M

出版信息

Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1978 Mar;25(1):7-15.

PMID:343940
Abstract

With the experimental apparatus designed and made available by Nicholes, we evaluated the bacterial filtration efficienty (B.F.E.) of the non-woven fabric and cotton cloth masks. The apparatus was supplied by Nicholes (U.S. Military Specification 36954 C mask, surgical, disposable). The study presented here was performed as a round robin test with Nicholes. By using this apparatus, comparison was made as to the B.F.E. of the six different kinds of surgical face mask before and after prolonged use. The result was obtained that the disposable mask made of glass fiber mat combined with non-woven fabric proved to be the highest in performance with a B.F.E. of 98.1-99.4%. It is useful both in preventing hospital infection and in general clinical practice. The B.F.E. of the conventional cotton cloth masks is not only lower but variable over a wide range of 43.1-93.6%.

摘要

利用尼科尔斯设计并提供的实验装置,我们评估了无纺布口罩和棉布口罩的细菌过滤效率(B.F.E.)。该装置由尼科尔斯提供(美国军方规格36954 C型口罩,外科用,一次性)。此处呈现的研究是与尼科尔斯合作进行的循环测试。通过使用该装置,对六种不同类型的外科口罩在长期使用前后的细菌过滤效率进行了比较。结果表明,由玻璃纤维毡与无纺布组合制成的一次性口罩性能最高,细菌过滤效率为98.1 - 99.4%。它在预防医院感染和一般临床实践中都很有用。传统棉布口罩的细菌过滤效率不仅较低,而且在43.1 - 93.6%的广泛范围内变化。

相似文献

1
A study on the microbial filtration efficiency of surgical face masks--with special reference to the non-woven fabric mask.外科口罩微生物过滤效率的研究——特别提及无纺布口罩
Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1978 Mar;25(1):7-15.
2
Efficiency of bacterial filtration in various commercial air filters for hospital air conditioning.各类用于医院空调的商用空气过滤器的细菌过滤效率。
Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1978 Sep;25(3):147-55.
3
Fitted filtration efficiency and breathability of 2-ply cotton masks: Identification of cotton consumer categories acceptable for home-made cloth mask construction.双层棉口罩的过滤效率和透气性拟合:适合家用布制口罩制作的棉消费人群分类识别。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 22;17(3):e0264090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264090. eCollection 2022.
4
The efficiency of surgical masks of varying design and composition.不同设计和成分的外科口罩的效率。
Br J Surg. 1975 Dec;62(12):936-40. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800621203.
5
Effectiveness of face masks for the population.口罩对人群的有效性。
Ann Ig. 2021 Jul-Aug;33(4):347-359. doi: 10.7416/ai.2020.2390. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
6
Comparison of face masks in the bag-mask ventilation of a manikin.人体模型袋-面罩通气中不同面罩的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Feb;23(2):169-72. doi: 10.1017/S0265021505002103.
7
Effects of Face Masks on Physiological Parameters and Voice Production during Cycling Activity.口罩对骑行活动中生理参数和发声的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 26;19(11):6491. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116491.
8
Surgical area contamination--comparable bacterial counts using disposable head and mask and helmet aspirator system, but dramatic increase upon omission of head-gear: an experimental study in horizontal laminar air-flow.手术区域污染——使用一次性头部覆盖物、面罩和头盔式抽吸系统时细菌计数相当,但不使用头部装备时细菌计数急剧增加:在水平层流空气中的一项实验研究
J Hosp Infect. 2001 Feb;47(2):110-5. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2000.0909.
9
Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure.评估布口罩在减少颗粒物暴露方面的效果。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017 May;27(3):352-357. doi: 10.1038/jes.2016.42. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
10
Microbial penetration of surgical gown materials.手术衣材料的微生物穿透
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980 Apr;150(4):507-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in the Prophylaxis of Respiratory Infections by the Nasal and the Oromucosal Route: Relevance to the Fight with the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.经鼻和口腔黏膜途径预防呼吸道感染的进展:与抗击新冠疫情的相关性
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Feb 27;14(3):530. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030530.
2
The Potential for Cloth Masks to Protect Health Care Clinicians From SARS-CoV-2: A Rapid Review. cloth 口罩保护医护人员免受 SARS-CoV-2 感染的潜力:快速综述
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):55-62. doi: 10.1370/afm.2640.
3
Check the gap: Facemask performance and exhaled aerosol distributions around the wearer.
检查间隙:佩戴者周围口罩性能和呼出气溶胶分布。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 16;15(12):e0243885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243885. eCollection 2020.
4
Efficacy and Use of Cloth Masks: A Scoping Review.布口罩的功效与使用:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2020 Sep 13;12(9):e10423. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10423.
5
Selection of homemade mask materials for preventing transmission of COVID-19: A laboratory study.自制口罩材料预防 COVID-19 传播的选择:一项实验室研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240285. eCollection 2020.
6
Forgotten Technology in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Filtration Properties of Cloth and Cloth Masks-A Narrative Review.在 COVID-19 大流行中被遗忘的技术:织物和布制口罩的过滤性能——叙述性综述。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Oct;95(10):2204-2224. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
7
A modelling framework to assess the likely effectiveness of facemasks in combination with 'lock-down' in managing the COVID-19 pandemic.一个用于评估口罩与“封锁”措施相结合在管理新冠疫情中可能有效性的建模框架。
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Jun;476(2238):20200376. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0376. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
Mask or no mask for COVID-19: A public health and market study.口罩还是不戴口罩:一项关于 COVID-19 的公共卫生和市场研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 14;15(8):e0237691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237691. eCollection 2020.
9
Cloth Masks May Prevent Transmission of COVID-19: An Evidence-Based, Risk-Based Approach.布口罩可能有助于预防 COVID-19 的传播:基于证据和风险的方法。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 15;173(6):489-491. doi: 10.7326/M20-2567. Epub 2020 May 22.