School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Postgraduate school of Orthodontics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J Infect Public Health. 2021 Sep;14(9):1179-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.07.020. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
This systematic review aims to evaluate the evidence on the efficacy of mouth rinses on SARS-CoV-2 from in vitro studies. Five electronic databases were searched up to February 2021; no language or time restrictions were used. Two independent reviewers conducted both selection and data extraction processes. The toxicological data reliability assessment tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Starting from 239 articles, retrieved by the electronic search, only eight studies were included in our systematic review. Povidone Iodine (PVP-I) was effective in killing SARS-CoV-2, demonstrated higher virucidal activity than other commonly used active ingredients. Conflicting results were found about the effectiveness of Chlorhexidine (CHX) while hydrogen peroxide (HO) proved less effective than PVP-I. Other active ingredients, such as quaternary ammonium compounds and Ethanol (particularly when combined with essential oils), have also shown promising results in reducing viral load, with results comparable to PVP-I.
本系统评价旨在评估体外研究中漱口水对 SARS-CoV-2 的疗效的证据。截至 2021 年 2 月,检索了五个电子数据库;未对语言和时间进行限制。两名独立的审查员进行了选择和数据提取过程。使用毒理学数据可靠性评估工具来评估偏倚风险。从电子搜索中检索到的 239 篇文章中,只有 8 项研究被纳入我们的系统评价。聚维酮碘(PVP-I)对杀死 SARS-CoV-2 有效,其病毒杀灭活性高于其他常用的有效成分。关于洗必泰(CHX)的有效性存在矛盾的结果,而过氧化氢(HO)的效果不如 PVP-I。其他活性成分,如季铵化合物和乙醇(特别是与精油结合使用时),在降低病毒载量方面也显示出有希望的结果,其效果可与 PVP-I 相媲美。