Park Han Sang, Lee Jeong-Moo, Hong Kwangpyo, Han Eui Soo, Hong Suk Kyun, Choi YoungRok, Yi Nam-Joon, Lee Kwang-Woong, Suh Kyung-Suk
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2021 Aug 31;25(3):336-341. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.3.336.
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: From June of 2016, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-based allocation system replaced the Child- Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score-based system for organ allocation liver in Korea. The aim of this study was to analyze changes in outcomes and arising issues before and after the implementation of the MELD system.
From June 2014 to June 2018, 129 patients were selected from recipients who underwent deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Seoul National University Hospital. Pediatric cases were excluded. According to the allocation system, patients were divided into two groups (52 in the MELD group and 77 in the CTP group).
MELD scores of the two groups differed significantly (37.8 ± 2.0 in the MELD group vs. 31.0 ± 8.2 in the CTP group; = 0.001). The etiology of patients was changed for liver transplantation. The proportion of alcoholic liver cirrhosis increased in the era of the MELD allocation system. However, proportions of hepatitis B related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma were decreased. Six-month mortality rate of the MELD group was 25.0%, which was higher than that (11.7%) of the CTP group ( = 0.022). The 90-day complication rate was significantly higher in the MELD group than in the CTP group (11.5% vs. 2.6%; = 0.040).
When the MELD allocation system was used to distribute livers to severely ill patients, it resulted in poorer outcomes after surgery and higher proportion of alcoholic cirrhosis. Thus, it is necessary to adjust the MELD allocation system so that outcomes after DDLT could be improved.
背景/目的:从2016年6月起,韩国基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)的分配系统取代了基于Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分的肝脏器官分配系统。本研究旨在分析MELD系统实施前后结局的变化及出现的问题。
2014年6月至2018年6月,从首尔国立大学医院接受尸体供肝肝移植(DDLT)的受者中选取129例患者。排除儿科病例。根据分配系统,将患者分为两组(MELD组52例,CTP组77例)。
两组的MELD评分差异显著(MELD组为37.8±2.0,CTP组为31.0±8.2;P = 0.001)。肝移植患者的病因发生了变化。在MELD分配系统时代,酒精性肝硬化的比例增加。然而,乙型肝炎相关肝硬化和肝细胞癌的比例下降。MELD组的6个月死亡率为25.0%,高于CTP组的11.7%(P = (此处原文有误,推测应为P)0.022)。MELD组的90天并发症发生率显著高于CTP组(11.5%对2.6%;P = 0.040)。
当使用MELD分配系统将肝脏分配给重症患者时,术后结局较差且酒精性肝硬化比例较高。因此,有必要调整MELD分配系统,以改善尸体供肝肝移植后的结局。