Suppr超能文献

美国肝脏分配的现状

Current Status of Liver Allocation in the United States.

作者信息

Elwir Saleh, Lake John

机构信息

Dr Elwir is a gastroenterology and hepatology fellow and Dr Lake is a professor of medicine in the Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Dr Lake is also the executive medical director of the solid organ transplant program at the University of Minnesota.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2016 Mar;12(3):166-70.

Abstract

The liver transplant allocation system is currently based upon the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and allocates organs preferentially to patients with the highest scores (ie, the sickest patients) within a defined geographic unit. In addition, certain patient populations, such as patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portopulmonary hypertension, receive MELD exception points to account for their increased waitlist mortality, which is not reflected by their MELD score. Significant geographic variation in the access to liver transplantation exists throughout the United States. Both the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network Board of Directors and the Health Resources and Services Administration have determined these geographic disparities to be unacceptable. The liver transplant community has worked to develop methods to reduce these geographic disparities and to reexamine how MELD exception points are granted to certain patient populations. As a result, numerous policy changes have been adopted throughout the years that have broadened the sharing of organs through wider geographic sharing. Despite all of these changes, variation in access to liver transplantation continues to exist, and, thus, the liver transplant community continues to examine new ways to address geographic disparities. This paper reviews several of the key changes to the liver allocation system that have occurred since the implementation of MELD allocation in 2002 and provides an overview of potential changes to the system.

摘要

肝移植分配系统目前基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分,在特定地理区域内,优先将器官分配给评分最高的患者(即病情最严重的患者)。此外,某些患者群体,如肝细胞癌患者和门肺高压患者,会获得MELD例外积分,以考虑其在等待名单上更高的死亡风险,而这在其MELD评分中并未体现。在美国,肝移植的可及性存在显著的地理差异。器官获取与移植网络董事会和卫生资源与服务管理局均认定这些地理差异是不可接受的。肝移植领域一直在努力制定方法来减少这些地理差异,并重新审视如何向某些患者群体授予MELD例外积分。因此,多年来已实施了多项政策变革,通过扩大地理共享范围来拓宽器官分配。尽管有所有这些变化,肝移植可及性的差异仍然存在,因此,肝移植领域继续探索解决地理差异的新方法。本文回顾了自2002年实施MELD分配以来肝分配系统发生的一些关键变化,并概述了该系统可能的变化。

相似文献

1
Current Status of Liver Allocation in the United States.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2016 Mar;12(3):166-70.
3
Development of the allocation system for deceased donor liver transplantation.
Clin Med Res. 2005 May;3(2):87-92. doi: 10.3121/cmr.3.2.87.
4
Evolution of liver transplant organ allocation policy: Current limitations and future directions.
World J Hepatol. 2021 Aug 27;13(8):830-839. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i8.830.
7
Effects of Allocating Livers for Transplantation Based on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium Scores on Patient Outcomes.
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1451-1462.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
8
Liver transplant allocation policies and outcomes in United States: A comprehensive review.
World J Methodol. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):32-42. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i1.32.
9
Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates with High MELD and Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1647-1653. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5032-5. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
10
Geographic Disparities in Liver Allocation and Distribution in the United States: Where Are We Now?
Transplant Proc. 2019 Dec;51(10):3205-3212. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
US Population Size and Outcomes of Adults on Liver Transplant Waiting Lists.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251759. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1759.
2
Indications and outcomes of liver transplantation for liver tumors in the United States.
Surg Pract Sci. 2024 Apr 4;17:100245. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100245. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
The transformative potential of artificial intelligence in solid organ transplantation.
Front Transplant. 2024 Mar 15;3:1361491. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1361491. eCollection 2024.
5
A Decade of Liver Transplantation in the United States: Drivers of Discard and Underutilization.
Transplant Direct. 2024 May 3;10(6):e1605. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001605. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
MELD or MELD-Na as a Predictive Model for Mortality Following Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement.
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2023 Feb 28;11(1):38-44. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00513. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
9
Machine Learning Applications in Solid Organ Transplantation and Related Complications.
Front Immunol. 2021 Sep 16;12:739728. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.739728. eCollection 2021.
10

本文引用的文献

1
One Size Does Not Fit All--Regional Variation in the Impact of the Share 35 Liver Allocation Policy.
Am J Transplant. 2016 Jan;16(1):137-42. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13500. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
3
Early changes in liver distribution following implementation of Share 35.
Am J Transplant. 2015 Mar;15(3):659-67. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13099.
6
OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: liver.
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jan;15 Suppl 2:1-28. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13197.
7
Addressing geographic disparities in liver transplantation through redistricting.
Am J Transplant. 2013 Aug;13(8):2052-8. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12301. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
8
Exception point applications for 15 points: an unintended consequence of the share 15 policy.
Liver Transpl. 2012 Nov;18(11):1302-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.23537. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
9
MELD Exceptions and Rates of Waiting List Outcomes.
Am J Transplant. 2011 Nov;11(11):2362-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03735.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验