• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国已故捐赠者肝脏分配政策的变化:麻醉医生的观点

Changes in the allocation policy for deceased donor livers in Korea: perspectives from anesthesiologists.

作者信息

Yoo Seung Yeon, Kim Gaab Soo

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Jan;16(1):68-74. doi: 10.17085/apm.20035. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

DOI:10.17085/apm.20035
PMID:33486941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7861900/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The allocation policy for deceased donor livers in Korea was changed in June 2016 from Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scoring system-based to Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system-based. Thus, it is necessary to review the effect of allocation policy changes on anesthetic management.

METHODS

Medical records of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) from December 2014 to May 2017 were reviewed. We compared the perioperative parameters before and after the change in allocation policy.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients underwent DDLT from December 2014 to May 2016 (CTP group), and 42 patients underwent DDLT from June 2016 to May 2017 (MELD group). The MELD score was significantly higher in the MELD group than in the CTP group (36.5 ± 4.6 vs. 26.5 ± 9.4, P < 0.001). The incidence of hepatorenal syndrome was higher in the MELD group than in the CTP group (26 vs. 7, P < 0.001). Packed red blood cell transfusion occurred more frequently in the MELD group than in the CTP group (5.0 ± 3.6 units vs. 3.4 ± 2.2 units, P = 0.025). However, intraoperative bleeding, vasopressor support, and postoperative outcomes were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the patient's objective condition deteriorated, perioperative parameters did not change significantly.

摘要

背景

韩国已故供体肝脏的分配政策于2016年6月从基于Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分系统改为基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分系统。因此,有必要回顾分配政策变化对麻醉管理的影响。

方法

回顾了2014年12月至2017年5月已故供体肝移植(DDLT)的病历。我们比较了分配政策改变前后的围手术期参数。

结果

2014年12月至2016年5月有37例患者接受了DDLT(CTP组),2016年6月至2017年5月有42例患者接受了DDLT(MELD组)。MELD组的MELD评分显著高于CTP组(36.5±4.6对26.5±9.4,P<0.001)。MELD组肝肾综合征的发生率高于CTP组(26例对7例,P<0.001)。MELD组浓缩红细胞输注比CTP组更频繁(5.0±3.6单位对3.4±2.2单位,P=0.025)。然而,两组之间的术中出血、血管活性药物支持和术后结果并无差异。

结论

尽管患者的客观状况恶化,但围手术期参数并未显著改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e5f/7861900/f251f5cb1e33/apm-20035f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e5f/7861900/f251f5cb1e33/apm-20035f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e5f/7861900/f251f5cb1e33/apm-20035f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in the allocation policy for deceased donor livers in Korea: perspectives from anesthesiologists.韩国已故捐赠者肝脏分配政策的变化:麻醉医生的观点
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Jan;16(1):68-74. doi: 10.17085/apm.20035. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
Impact of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease allocation system on outcomes of deceased donor liver transplantation: A single-center experience.终末期肝病分配系统模型对尸体供肝肝移植结局的影响:单中心经验
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2021 Aug 31;25(3):336-341. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.3.336.
3
The impact of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score on deceased donor liver transplant outcomes in low volume liver transplantation center: a retrospective and single-center study.终末期肝病模型评分对低容量肝移植中心尸体供肝肝移植结局的影响:一项回顾性单中心研究
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Dec;101(6):360-367. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.101.6.360. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
4
Impact of Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score-based Allocation System in Korea: A Nationwide Study.韩国基于终末期肝病模型评分的分配系统的影响:一项全国性研究。
Transplantation. 2019 Dec;103(12):2515-2522. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002755.
5
Successful introduction of Model for End-stage Liver Disease scoring in deceased donor liver transplantation in Korea: analysis of first 1 year experience at a high-volume transplantation center.终末期肝病评分系统在韩国尸体供肝肝移植中的成功引入:一家大型移植中心首年经验分析
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2017 Nov;21(4):199-204. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2017.21.4.199. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
6
Deceased donor liver transplantation under the Korean model for end-stage liver disease score-based liver allocation system: 2-year allocation results at a high-volume transplantation center.基于韩国终末期肝病评分的肝脏分配系统下的尸体供肝肝移植:一家高容量移植中心的2年分配结果
Korean J Transplant. 2019 Dec 31;33(4):112-117. doi: 10.4285/jkstn.2019.33.4.112.
7
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.肝细胞癌的肝移植:终末期肝病模型(MELD)的影响
Liver Transpl. 2004 Jan;10(1):36-41. doi: 10.1002/lt.20012.
8
[Comparative study of the MELD-Na and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores as short-term prognostic indicators of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure].[MELD-Na评分与Child-Turcotte-Pugh评分作为慢性乙型肝炎急性肝衰竭短期预后指标的比较研究]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Nov;22(11):801-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2014.11.001.
9
Predicting Mortality Across a Broad Spectrum of Liver Disease-An Assessment of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), and Creatinine-Modified CTP Scores.预测广泛肝病患者的死亡率——对终末期肝病模型(MELD)、Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分以及肌酐修正CTP评分的评估
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2011 Dec;1(3):161-8. doi: 10.1016/S0973-6883(11)60233-8. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
10
National Liver Allocation Policy-Consensus Document by the Liver Transplantation Society of India for a Nationally Uniform System of Allocation of Deceased Donor Liver Grafts.印度肝脏移植协会关于全国统一的已故捐赠者肝脏移植分配系统的国家肝脏分配政策共识文件。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 Mar-Apr;13(2):303-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Viscoelastic coagulation test for liver transplantation.肝移植的粘弹性凝血试验
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020 Apr 30;15(2):143-151. doi: 10.17085/apm.2020.15.2.143. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
2
Impact of MELD Score-Based Organ Allocation on Mortality, Bleeding, and Transfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Before-and-After Observational Cohort Study.基于 MELD 评分的器官分配对肝移植死亡率、出血和输血的影响:一项前后观察性队列研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Oct;33(10):2719-2725. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
3
Pathogenesis, prevention, and management of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with liver diseases.
肝病患者出血与血栓形成的发病机制、预防及管理
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2017 Aug 5;1(2):150-161. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12028. eCollection 2017 Oct.
4
Intraoperative management of liver transplant recipients having severe renal dysfunction: results of 42 cases.严重肾功能不全肝移植受者的术中管理:42例结果
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Jul;95(1):45-53. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.1.45. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
5
High MELD score does not adversely affect outcome of living donor liver transplantation: Experience in 1000 recipients.高终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对活体肝移植受者的预后并无不利影响:1000例受者的经验
Clin Transplant. 2017 Aug;31(8). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13006.
6
The Rebalanced Hemostasis System in End-stage Liver Disease and Its Impact on Liver Transplantation.终末期肝病中的止血系统再平衡及其对肝移植的影响。
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2017 Spring;55(2):107-120. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000139.
7
Acute kidney injury in liver transplant candidates: a position paper on behalf of the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe.肝移植候选者的急性肾损伤:代表欧洲肝重症监护组的立场文件。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 Jan;83(1):88-101. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11661-X. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
8
Hemostasis in liver transplantation: Pathophysiology, monitoring, and treatment.肝移植中的止血:病理生理学、监测与治疗
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 28;22(4):1541-50. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i4.1541.
9
Management of bleeding and transfusion during liver transplantation before and after the introduction of a rotational thromboelastometry-based algorithm.基于旋转血栓弹力图的算法引入前后肝移植期间出血与输血的管理
Liver Transpl. 2015 Feb;21(2):169-79. doi: 10.1002/lt.24030. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
10
Impact of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score on transfusion rates in liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型评分对肝移植输血率的影响
Transplant Proc. 2013 Sep;45(7):2684-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.07.006.