Choi Janet S, Yin Victoria, Wu Franklin, Bhatt Neel K, O'Dell Karla, Johns Michael
Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
XXX, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2022 Apr;132(4):831-837. doi: 10.1002/lary.29838. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the concordance in diagnosis and management between initial telemedicine visits and subsequent in-person visits with laryngoscopy for laryngology-related complaints during COVID-19.
Retrospective cohort study.
Patients who presented to a tertiary care center with laryngology-related complaints (voice, swallowing, airway, general throat complaints and others) and completed initial telemedicine visits and subsequent in-person visits with laryngoscopy between March and October 2020 were included (n = 250). Preliminary diagnoses and managements provided during initial telemedicine visits were compared with the diagnoses and managements during subsequent in-person visits with laryngoscopy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to compare concordance rates in diagnosis and management by chief complaint categories after adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical factors.
Overall concordance rates in diagnosis and management between the initial telemedicine visit and subsequent laryngoscopy exam were 86.1% and 93.7%, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) days until laryngoscopy from the initial visit were 21.2 (23.0). Concordance rates were not associated with patient's age, gender, preferred language, provider, telemedicine visit duration, or days until laryngoscopy. Management concordance rate was relatively lower among patients with general throat complaints in comparison with voice-related complaints (odds ratio: 0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.08-0.90). Management changes after laryngoscopy included need for further imaging, procedures, voice therapy, and referral to other specialists.
Concordance rates in diagnosis and management remained high between the initial telemedicine visit and subsequent in-person visit with laryngoscopy for new patients presenting with laryngology-related complaints during the COVID-19 pandemic. While laryngoscopy is still essential to confirm diagnosis and provide appropriate management, telemedicine may be a feasible alternative to provide suitable empiric therapy until laryngoscopy can be safely performed.
4 Laryngoscope, 132:831-837, 2022.
目的/假设:调查在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)期间,因喉科相关主诉进行的初次远程医疗问诊与随后的喉镜检查面对面问诊之间在诊断和管理方面的一致性。
回顾性队列研究。
纳入2020年3月至10月期间因喉科相关主诉(声音、吞咽、气道、一般咽喉部主诉及其他)就诊于三级医疗中心,并完成初次远程医疗问诊及随后的喉镜检查面对面问诊的患者(n = 250)。将初次远程医疗问诊期间提供的初步诊断和管理与随后的喉镜检查面对面问诊期间的诊断和管理进行比较。在调整相关人口统计学和临床因素后,进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以比较按主要主诉类别划分的诊断和管理的一致性率。
初次远程医疗问诊与随后的喉镜检查之间的总体诊断和管理一致性率分别为86.1%和93.7%。从初次就诊到喉镜检查的平均(标准差)天数为21.2(23.0)天。一致性率与患者的年龄、性别、首选语言、医疗服务提供者、远程医疗问诊时长或到喉镜检查的天数无关。与声音相关主诉的患者相比,一般咽喉部主诉患者的管理一致性率相对较低(比值比:0.27;95%置信区间:0.08 - 0.90)。喉镜检查后的管理变化包括需要进一步的影像学检查、手术、语音治疗以及转诊至其他专科医生。
在COVID-19大流行期间,对于因喉科相关主诉就诊的新患者,初次远程医疗问诊与随后的喉镜检查面对面问诊之间的诊断和管理一致性率仍然很高。虽然喉镜检查对于确诊和提供适当的管理仍然至关重要,但在能够安全进行喉镜检查之前,远程医疗可能是提供合适经验性治疗的可行替代方法。
4 《喉镜》,132:831 - 837,2022年。