• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌收缩分数在射血分数保留的低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄中的风险分层。

Myocardial Contraction Fraction for Risk Stratification in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

机构信息

Pôle Coeur-Thorax-Vaisseaux, Department of Cardiology (D.R., Y.B., M.K., C.T.), University Hospital Amiens, France.

Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Santé, Laboratoire MP3CV - EA 7517, Université de Picardie, Amiens, France (D.R., Y.B., S.M., C.T.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Aug;14(8):e012257. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012257. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012257
PMID:34403263
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) is a volumetric measure of myocardial shortening independent of left ventricular size and geometry. This multicenter study investigates the usefulness of MCF for risk stratification in low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

METHODS

We included 643 consecutive patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction in whom MCF was computed at baseline and analyzed mortality during follow-up.

RESULTS

Throughout follow-up with medical and surgical management (34.9 [16.1-65.3] months), lower MCF tertiles had higher mortality than the highest tertile. Eighty-month survival was 56±4% for MCF>41%, 41±4% for MCF 30% to 41%, and 40±4% for MCF<30% (<0.001). After comprehensive adjustment, mortality risk remained high for MCF 30% to 41% (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.53 [1.08-2.18]) and for MCF<30% (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.82 [1.24-2.66]) versus MCF>41%. The optimal MCF cutoff point for mortality prediction was 41%. Age, body mass index, Charlson index, peak aortic velocity, and ejection fraction were independently associated with mortality. MCF (χ to improve 10.39; =0.001), provided greater additional prognostic value over the baseline parameters than stroke volume (SV) index (χ to improve 5.41; =0.042), left ventricular mass index (χ to improve 2.15; =0.137), or global longitudinal strain (χ to improve 3.67; =0.061). MCF outperformed ejection fraction for mortality prediction. When patients were classified by SV index and MCF, mortality risk was low when SV index was ≥30 mL/m and MCF>41%, higher for patients with SV index ≥30 mL/m and MCF≤41% (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.47 [1.05-2.07]) and extremely high for patients with SV index <30 mL/m (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.29 [1.45-3.62]).

CONCLUSIONS

MCF is a valuable marker of risk in low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction and could improve decision-making, especially in normal-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

摘要

背景

心肌收缩分数(MCF)是一种独立于左心室大小和几何形状的心肌缩短的容积测量方法。这项多中心研究旨在探讨 MCF 在射血分数保留的低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的风险分层中的作用。

方法

我们纳入了 643 例射血分数保留的低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者,在基线时计算 MCF 并分析随访期间的死亡率。

结果

在接受药物和手术治疗的整个随访期间(34.9[16.1-65.3]个月),MCF 三分位较低的患者死亡率高于三分位较高的患者。MCF>41%、MCF 30%至 41%和 MCF<30%的 80 个月生存率分别为 56±4%、41±4%和 40±4%(<0.001)。在全面调整后,MCF 30%至 41%(调整后的危险比,1.53[1.08-2.18])和 MCF<30%(调整后的危险比,1.82[1.24-2.66])的死亡风险仍然较高,而 MCF>41%。MCF 用于预测死亡率的最佳截断点为 41%。年龄、体重指数、Charlson 指数、峰值主动脉速度和射血分数与死亡率独立相关。MCF(χ²改善 10.39;P=0.001)比 SV 指数(χ²改善 5.41;P=0.042)、左心室质量指数(χ²改善 2.15;P=0.137)或整体纵向应变(χ²改善 3.67;P=0.061)提供了更大的预后价值。MCF 比射血分数更能预测死亡率。当根据 SV 指数和 MCF 对患者进行分类时,SV 指数≥30mL/m 和 MCF>41%的患者死亡率较低,SV 指数≥30mL/m 和 MCF≤41%的患者(调整后的危险比,1.47[1.05-2.07])的死亡率较高,SV 指数<30mL/m 的患者(调整后的危险比,2.29[1.45-3.62])的死亡率极高。

结论

MCF 是射血分数保留的低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的一种有价值的风险标志物,可改善决策,特别是在射血分数保留的低流量低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄中。

相似文献

1
Myocardial Contraction Fraction for Risk Stratification in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction.心肌收缩分数在射血分数保留的低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄中的风险分层。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Aug;14(8):e012257. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012257. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
2
Integration of Flow-Gradient Patterns Into Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Suspected Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved LVEF: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Meta-Analysis.血流储备分数与梯度在左心室射血分数保留的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者临床决策中的整合:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;9(11):1255-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.035. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
3
Transaortic Flow Rate and Risk Stratification in Moderate Aortic Stenosis.中度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的经主动脉血流速率与危险分层
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2025 Aug;38(8):643-654. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.017. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
4
Severe Mitral Regurgitation in Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.矛盾性低流量、低跨瓣压差重度主动脉瓣狭窄合并重度二尖瓣反流
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 May;18(5):e017598. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.017598. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
5
Impact of sex-specific thresholds for low flow in assessment of prognosis in concordantly and discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis.性别特异性低流量阈值在评估一致和不一致分级主动脉瓣狭窄预后中的影响
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jan 31;26(2):280-286. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae272.
6
Pulse pressure and aortic valve peak velocity and incident heart failure after myocardial infarction: a cohort study.脉压、主动脉瓣峰值速度与心肌梗死后心力衰竭的发生:一项队列研究
Heart. 2025 Mar 26;111(8):370-377. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324517.
7
Dimensionless Index in Patients With Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction.低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄伴射血分数保留患者的无维度指数。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct;13(10):e010925. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.010925. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
8
Epicardial adipose tissue, myocardial remodelling and adverse outcomes in asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.无症状主动脉瓣狭窄患者的心外膜脂肪组织、心肌重构与不良结局:一项随机对照试验的事后分析
Heart. 2025 Jun 26;111(14):686-694. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324925.
9
Early Stroke Volume Variation After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Low-Flow Aortic Stenosis.经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术后早期每搏量变异可预测低流量主动脉瓣狭窄患者的临床结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;106(2):1012-1022. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31654. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
10
5-Year Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.低风险患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的5年超声心动图结果
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jun;18(6):625-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.01.015. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcome Prediction Model in Tetralogy of Fallot Without Pulmonary Valve Replacement Using Contraction Fraction From the SCOUT-TOF Registry.使用SCOUT-TOF注册研究中的收缩分数对法洛四联症患者不进行肺动脉瓣置换术的临床结局预测模型
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e037983. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037983. Epub 2025 May 13.
2
Cardiac amyloidosis and aortic stenosis: a state-of-the-art review.心脏淀粉样变性与主动脉瓣狭窄:最新综述
Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Oct 12;3(6):oead106. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead106. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Assessment of Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Risk Factors Associated With "Low Flow State" Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.
利用心脏磁共振评估与“低流量状态”相关的患病率、临床特征及危险因素
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023 Sep 29;7(5):443-451. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.003. eCollection 2023 Oct.