Institute of Automation and Robotics, Poznań University of Technology, Poland.
Department of Medical Physics and Radiospectroscopy, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Sep 14;64(9):3603-3616. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00608. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
Purpose The acoustic source that is attended to by the listener in a mixture can be identified with a certain accuracy on the basis of their neural response recorded during listening, and various phenomena may be used to detect attention. For example, neural tracking (NT) and alpha power lateralization (APL) may be utilized in order to obtain information concerning attention. However, these methods of auditory attention detection (AAD) are typically tested in different experimental setups, which makes it impossible to compare their accuracy. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of AAD based on NT, APL, and their combination for a dichotic natural speech listening task. Method Thirteen adult listeners were presented with dichotic speech stimuli and instructed to attend to one of them. Electroencephalogram of the subjects was continuously recorded during the experiment using a set of 32 active electrodes. The accuracy of AAD was evaluated for trial lengths of 50, 25, and 12.5 s. AAD was tested for various parameters of NT- and APL-based modules. Results The obtained results suggest that NT of natural running speech provides similar accuracy to APL. The statistically significant improvement of the accuracy of AAD using a combined method has been observed not only for the longest duration of test samples (50 s, = .005) but also for shorter ones (25 s, = .011). Conclusions It seems that the combination of standard NT and APL significantly increases the effectiveness of accurate identification of the traced signal perceived by a listener under dichotic conditions. It has been demonstrated that, under certain conditions, the combination of NT and APL may provide a benefit for AAD in cocktail party scenarios.
目的 在混合声音中,听众可以根据他们在聆听过程中记录的神经反应,以一定的准确度识别出被注意的声源,并且可以利用各种现象来检测注意力。例如,可以利用神经跟踪(NT)和 alpha 功率侧化(APL)来获取有关注意力的信息。然而,这些听觉注意力检测(AAD)方法通常在不同的实验设置中进行测试,这使得无法比较它们的准确性。本研究的目的是比较基于 NT、APL 及其组合的 AAD 在双声道自然语音聆听任务中的准确性。
方法 13 名成年听众被呈现双声道语音刺激,并被指示注意其中之一。在实验过程中,使用一组 32 个有源电极连续记录受试者的脑电图。评估了基于 NT 和 APL 的模块的不同参数的 AAD 的准确性。
结果 结果表明,自然语音的 NT 提供了与 APL 相似的准确性。使用组合方法观察到 AAD 准确性的显著提高,不仅对于最长测试样本持续时间(50 秒, =.005),而且对于较短的测试样本持续时间(25 秒, =.011)也是如此。
结论 似乎标准的 NT 和 APL 的组合显著提高了在双声道条件下听众感知到的被跟踪信号的准确识别效果。已经证明,在某些条件下,NT 和 APL 的组合可能会为鸡尾酒会场景中的 AAD 提供益处。