Suppr超能文献

基于患者报告结局的对话工具在癌症诊疗中的应用对患者自我管理和健康相关生活质量的影响:一项临床对照试验。

Effect of patient-reported outcomes as a dialogue-based tool in cancer consultations on patient self-management and health-related quality of life: a clinical, controlled trial.

机构信息

Experimental Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.

Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2021 Dec;60(12):1668-1677. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1962972. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With increased survival among patients with metastatic melanoma and limited time with health care providers, patients are expected to assume a more active role in managing their treatment and care. Activated patients have the knowledge, skills, and confidence to make effective solutions to self-manage health. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) could have the potential to enhance patient activation. However, PRO-based interventions that facilitate an activation in patients with metastatic melanoma are lacking and warranted.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective non-randomized controlled, clinical trial, patients with metastatic melanoma were assigned to either the intervention (systematic feedback and discussion of PRO during consultation) given at one hospital or the control group (treatment as usual) if they received treatment from two other hospitals in Denmark. The primary outcome was the patient activation measure (PAM), which reflects self-management. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL), self-efficacy, and Patient-Physician interaction. Outcomes were measured at baseline, and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The analysis of the effect from baseline to 12 months employed mixed-effects modeling.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2019, patients were allocated to either the intervention group ( = 137) or the control group ( = 142). We found no significant difference in the course of patient activation between the two groups over time. The course of HRQoL was statistically significantly improved by the intervention compared to the control group. Especially, females in the intervention group performed better than males. The other secondary outcomes were not improved by the intervention.

CONCLUSION

The intervention did not improve knowledge, skills, and confidence for self-management for patients with metastatic melanoma. Neither did it improve coping self-efficacy nor perceived efficacy in Patient-Physician interaction. However, the results suggest that the intervention can have a significant impact on HRQoL and in particular social and emotional well-being among the females.

摘要

背景

转移性黑色素瘤患者的生存率提高,与医疗保健提供者相处的时间有限,因此患者需要在管理自身治疗和护理方面发挥更积极的作用。积极性高的患者具备知识、技能和信心,能够有效地自我管理健康。使用患者报告的结局(PRO)有可能增强患者的积极性。然而,目前缺乏能够促进转移性黑色素瘤患者积极性的基于 PRO 的干预措施,因此有必要进行相关研究。

材料与方法

在这项前瞻性非随机对照临床试验中,将丹麦两家医院的转移性黑色素瘤患者分配至干预组(在就诊时接受 PRO 的系统反馈和讨论)或对照组(常规治疗)。主要结局是患者激活度量(PAM),反映自我管理。次要结局是健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、自我效能和医患互动。在基线、治疗后 3、6 和 12 个月时进行结局评估。采用混合效应模型分析从基线到 12 个月的效果。

结果

2017 年至 2019 年间,患者被分配至干预组(n=137)或对照组(n=142)。我们发现两组患者的激活水平在治疗期间没有随时间发生显著变化。与对照组相比,干预组患者的 HRQoL 得到了统计学显著改善。特别是,干预组中的女性比男性表现更好。其他次要结局未因干预而得到改善。

结论

该干预措施并未提高转移性黑色素瘤患者的知识、技能和自我管理信心,也未改善应对自我效能或医患互动中的效能感。然而,结果表明该干预措施可能对女性患者的 HRQoL 产生重大影响,特别是对其社交和情感健康方面。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验