Suppr超能文献

视力障碍与医疗保健利用之间的关联。

Association Between Visual Impairment and Health Care Use.

机构信息

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan (C.-H.H.); Institute of Public Health, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan (C.-H.H., C.P.); Department of Ophthalmology, Change Gung Memorial Hospital, Xiamen, China (C.-H.H.); Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taiwan (C.-H.H.).

Institute of Public Health, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan (C.-H.H., C.P.).

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb;234:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.07.033. Epub 2021 Aug 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the association between visual impairment (VI) and medical care use.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

METHODS

The study cohort included individuals from 2007 to 2017. The Disability Registry was used to identify all patients aged ≥20 years who newly developed visual disability. All patients were observed until they became visually impaired (case group). They were then matched with 2 control groups: (1) people with nonvisual disability and (2) people without any disability. The main outcome measures were (1) ophthalmic outpatient and inpatient use and (2) nonophthalmic outpatient and inpatient use.

RESULTS

Compared with people with nonvisual disability, those with visual disability demonstrated a lower nonophthalmic outpatient costs (-NT$42,841, P < .001) and outpatient visits (-2.8 times). However, the opposite was noted for ophthalmic use, where people with visual disability used more medical care compared with people with other types of disability and people without disability. An age-stratified analysis revealed that visual disabilities had an age-related dose-response effect on the reception of nonophthalmic care and a slight nonlinear effect on the receipt of ophthalmic care.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies investigating the effect of VI on medical use should differentiate aggregate use into different types. Use of ophthalmic and nonophthalmic care for people with VI should be compared with that of people with other types of disability and people without disability.

摘要

目的

确定视力障碍(VI)与医疗保健使用之间的关联。

设计

基于人群的队列研究。

方法

研究队列包括 2007 年至 2017 年的个体。使用残疾登记处确定所有新出现视力障碍的≥20 岁患者。所有患者均被观察直至视力受损(病例组)。然后,他们与 2 个对照组匹配:(1)无视力障碍者,(2)无任何残疾者。主要结局指标为:(1)眼科门诊和住院使用,(2)非眼科门诊和住院使用。

结果

与无视力障碍者相比,视力障碍者的非眼科门诊费用较低(-新台币 42841 元,P <.001),门诊就诊次数减少(-2.8 次)。然而,眼科使用则相反,视力障碍者的医疗保健使用量多于其他类型残疾者和无残疾者。分层年龄分析显示,视力障碍与非眼科护理的接受度呈年龄相关的剂量反应关系,与眼科护理的接受度呈轻微非线性关系。

结论

研究 VI 对医疗使用的影响的研究应将总使用量分为不同类型。应将 VI 患者的眼科和非眼科护理使用与其他类型残疾者和无残疾者进行比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验