• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Marginal Bone Resorption Around Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Socket Preserved Sites: A 5 Years Follow-up Study.牙槽窝保存部位种植体周围的边缘骨吸收:一项5年随访研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021 Sep;20(3):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01367-2. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
2
Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial.上颌前部保存牙槽窝内即刻种植体即刻非咬合负重与延期种植的比较:一项随机对照试验的负重后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Winter;8(4):361-72.
3
Single post-extractive ultra-wide 7 mm-diameter implants versus implants placed in molar healed sites after socket preservation for molar replacement: 6-month post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial.单颗拔牙后超宽7毫米直径种植体与磨牙位点保存后在磨牙愈合位点植入种植体用于磨牙替代的比较:一项随机对照试验的6个月加载后结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(3):263-275.
4
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of single-tooth dental implants placed in grafted extraction sites: a one-year report.种植于移植拔牙位点的单颗牙种植体的临床及影像学评估:一年期报告
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2013 Oct;15(4):113-24.
5
Tissue stability of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a 5-year prospective single-cohort study.植入新鲜拔牙窝内种植体的组织稳定性:一项为期5年的前瞻性单队列研究。
J Periodontol. 2014 Sep;85(9):e323-32. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.140175. Epub 2014 May 16.
6
Immediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 12-month prospective multicenter cohort study.磨牙拔牙位点即刻黏膜下种植体植入:一项为期12个月的前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 May;19(5):476-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01541.x.
7
Immediate loading of post-extractive versus delayed placed single implants in the anterior maxilla: outcome of a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial 1-year after loading.上颌前部拔牙后即刻种植与延期种植单颗种植体的即刻负重:一项实用多中心随机对照试验负重1年后的结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Winter;8(4):347-58.
8
Alveolar process preservation at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine bone mineral - an experimental study in dogs.使用脱蛋白牛骨矿物质在即刻植入拔牙窝中的种植体保存牙槽嵴 - 一项犬的实验研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):789-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02332.x. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
9
A digital evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation at implants placed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog.对即刻植入拔牙窝的种植体周围牙槽嵴保存情况的数字化评估:一项在犬类动物中的实验研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(1):102-8. doi: 10.1111/clr.12307. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
10
Tissue changes of extraction sockets in humans: a comparison of spontaneous healing vs. ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing.人类拔牙窝的组织变化:自发愈合与采用二期软组织愈合的牙槽嵴保存的比较
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1231-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02535.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Influencing factors and survival rates in immediate vs. delayed dental implant placement: a six-year retrospective analysis.即刻与延期牙种植体植入的影响因素及生存率:一项六年回顾性分析。
Front Dent Med. 2025 Apr 29;6:1563641. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2025.1563641. eCollection 2025.
2
Latest Findings of the Regenerative Materials Application in Periodontal and Peri-Implant Surgery: A Scoping Review.牙周及种植体周围手术中再生材料应用的最新研究结果:一项范围综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Oct 21;9(10):594. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9100594.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of implants placed in ridge-preserved versus nonpreserved sites: A 4-year randomized clinical trial.种植体在保存牙槽嵴和非保存牙槽嵴位点的临床效果:一项为期 4 年的随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Dec;20(6):906-914. doi: 10.1111/cid.12682. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
2
Combination of bone graft and resorbable membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.骨移植与可吸收膜联合用于牙槽嵴保存:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
J Periodontol. 2018 Jan;89(1):46-57. doi: 10.1902/jop.2017.170241.
3
Alveolar socket preservation with demineralised bovine bone mineral and a collagen matrix.使用脱矿质牛骨矿物质和胶原基质进行牙槽窝保存。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Aug;47(4):194-210. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.194. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
4
Alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a Bayesian Network meta-analysis of grafting materials efficacy on prevention of bone height and width reduction.拔牙后牙槽嵴保存:关于预防骨高度和宽度减少的移植物材料疗效的贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析。
J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Jan;44(1):104-114. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12633. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
5
Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed after a ridge preservation procedure.牙槽嵴保存术后种植体植入的回顾性成功率和生存率
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Apr;28(4):461-468. doi: 10.1111/clr.12820. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
6
Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Study of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Combining Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft With Two Xenogeneic Collagen Matrices.冻干骨移植联合两种异种胶原基质进行牙槽嵴保存的前瞻性临床与影像学研究
J Periodontol. 2016 Apr;87(4):416-25. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.150500. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
7
Retrospective volume analysis of bone remodeling after tooth extraction with and without deproteinized bovine bone mineral insertion.拔牙后植入和未植入脱蛋白牛骨矿物质的骨重塑回顾性体积分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep;27(9):1152-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12712. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
8
The Effects of Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Meta-Analysis.牙槽嵴保存的效果:一项荟萃分析
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Dec;18(6):1248-1268. doi: 10.1111/cid.12364. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
9
Postextraction socket preservation using epithelial connective tissue graft vs porcine collagen matrix. 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial.使用上皮结缔组织移植物与猪胶原基质进行拔牙后牙槽窝保存。一项随机对照试验的1年结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015 Spring;8(1):39-48.
10
Minimally Invasive Single Implant Treatment (M.I.S.I.T.) based on ridge preservation and contour augmentation in patients with a high aesthetic risk profile: one-year results.基于保存牙槽嵴和轮廓增强的微创单牙种植治疗(MISIT)在高美学风险患者中的应用:一年的结果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42(4):398-405. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12384. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

牙槽窝保存部位种植体周围的边缘骨吸收:一项5年随访研究

Marginal Bone Resorption Around Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Socket Preserved Sites: A 5 Years Follow-up Study.

作者信息

Beretta Mario, Maiorana Carlo, Manfredini Mattia, Signorino Fabrizio, Poli Pier Paolo, Vinci Raffaele

机构信息

Implant Center for Edentulism and Jawbone Atrophies, Maxillofacial Surgery and Odontostomatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Via della Commenda 10, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Department of Dentistry, Vita-Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021 Sep;20(3):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01367-2. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1007/s12663-020-01367-2
PMID:34408364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8313622/
Abstract

AIM

The present study evaluated the clinical and radiological stability of hard and soft tissues following alveolar socket preservation (ASP) procedure with a follow-up of 5 year from implant insertion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The initial sample consisted of seven patients who underwent single tooth extraction and ASP procedure by means of demineralized bovine bone mineral particles covered with a porcine-derived non-cross-linked collagen matrix (CM). Each patient received a submerged single implant in the healed site. Mesial and distal peri-implant marginal bone resorption (MBR) rates were assessed radiographically at 1 year ( ) and 5 years ( ) after implant placement (baseline value).

RESULTS AND STATISTICS

No dropouts occurred up to 5 years. At , the MBR was 0.08 ± 0.16 mm at the mesial aspect and 0.1 ± 0.12 mm at the distal aspect. This difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.867). At , the mesial MBR was 0.15 ± 0.17 mm and the distal MBR was 0.11 ± 0.14 mm, with a non-statistically significant difference ( = 0.532). Therefore, no statistically significant differences were detected comparing mesial and distal MBR at any time point. With respect to the intra-group comparisons, no differences were observed comparing the different study periods within each variable. Indeed, the comparison between , and was non-statistically significant at both mesial ( = 0.06) and distal ( = 0.06) aspects. After 5 years, the volume of the soft tissues appeared clinically well maintained with a natural aspect around dental implants and adjacent teeth.

CONCLUSION

ASP using demineralized bovine bone mineral in combination with CM proved to be an effective technique to maintain stable dimensional volumes of both hard and soft tissues.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了牙槽窝保存(ASP)术后硬组织和软组织的临床及影像学稳定性,并在种植体植入后进行了5年的随访。

材料与方法

初始样本包括7例患者,这些患者接受了单颗牙拔除及ASP手术,使用脱矿牛骨矿物质颗粒覆盖猪源非交联胶原基质(CM)。每位患者在愈合部位接受一枚潜入式单颗种植体。在种植体植入后1年( )和5年( )(基线值)时,通过影像学评估种植体近中和远中边缘骨吸收(MBR)率。

结果与统计学分析

5年内无失访病例。在 时,近中MBR为0.08±0.16mm,远中MBR为0.1±0.12mm。这种差异无统计学意义( =0.867)。在 时,近中MBR为0.15±0.17mm,远中MBR为0.11±0.14mm,差异无统计学意义( =0.532)。因此,在任何时间点比较近中和远中MBR均未检测到统计学上的显著差异。关于组内比较,在每个变量的不同研究时期之间未观察到差异。实际上,在近中( =0.06)和远中( =0.06)方面, 、 和 之间的比较均无统计学意义。5年后,软组织体积在临床上保持良好,种植体及相邻牙齿周围呈现自然外观。

结论

使用脱矿牛骨矿物质与CM联合的ASP被证明是一种维持硬组织和软组织稳定尺寸体积的有效技术。