Suppr超能文献

牙槽嵴保存术后种植体植入的回顾性成功率和生存率

Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed after a ridge preservation procedure.

作者信息

Apostolopoulos Peter, Darby Ivan

机构信息

Periodontics, Melbourne Dental School, Parkville, Vic., Australia.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Apr;28(4):461-468. doi: 10.1111/clr.12820. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

Abstract

AIM

Ridge preservation is any procedure that takes place at the time of, or shortly after an extraction, to minimise resorption of the ridge and maximise bone formation within the socket. The aim of this project is to investigate the outcome of implant treatment following ridge preservation and compare it to an ungrafted implant control group.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Following ethics approval, an electronic and manual search of patient records was conducted, and appropriate cases of implant placement following a ridge preservation procedure were identified. Forty-two patients with 51 implants at ridge-preserved sites were examined by one author (PA) with the following parameters assessed at each implant: pocket probing depth, bleeding on probing, presence/absence of plaque and radiographic bone loss. Clinical and radiographic findings were compared to an ungrafted implant control group and analysed by years in function.

RESULTS

There was a 100% survival rate of implants in ridge-preserved sites. In the majority of cases, ridge preservation was performed in the anterior maxilla with a flap raised and the use of deproteinised bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane materials. The mean time in function was 31 (±24) months with a range of 2-102 months. Differences in the mean PPD, BOP, plaque index and radiographic bone loss were not statistically significant between implants at ridge-preserved or ungrafted sites. The overall success rate was around 58% for ungrafted implants and around 51% for implants in ridge-preserved sites. However, this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, implant placement at ridge-preserved sites was a predictable procedure that led to very high survival rates and similar success rates to implant placement at ungrafted sites.

摘要

目的

牙槽嵴保存是在拔牙时或拔牙后不久进行的任何操作,以尽量减少牙槽嵴的吸收并使牙槽窝内的骨形成最大化。本项目的目的是研究牙槽嵴保存后种植治疗的结果,并将其与未植骨的种植对照组进行比较。

方法和材料

在获得伦理批准后,对患者记录进行了电子和人工检索,确定了牙槽嵴保存术后进行种植体植入的合适病例。由一位作者(PA)对42例在牙槽嵴保存部位植入51颗种植体的患者进行检查,评估每颗种植体的以下参数:牙周袋探诊深度、探诊出血、菌斑存在/不存在情况以及影像学骨丢失。将临床和影像学结果与未植骨的种植对照组进行比较,并按使用年限进行分析。

结果

牙槽嵴保存部位的种植体存活率为100%。在大多数情况下,在上颌前部进行牙槽嵴保存,掀起瓣并使用脱蛋白牛骨矿物质和胶原膜材料。平均使用时间为31(±24)个月,范围为2 - 102个月。牙槽嵴保存部位或未植骨部位的种植体在平均牙周袋探诊深度、探诊出血、菌斑指数和影像学骨丢失方面的差异无统计学意义。未植骨种植体的总体成功率约为58%,牙槽嵴保存部位种植体的总体成功率约为51%。然而,这种差异无统计学意义。

结论

在这项回顾性研究中,在牙槽嵴保存部位植入种植体是一种可预测的操作,其导致的存活率非常高,且成功率与在未植骨部位植入种植体相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验