• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神疾病患者中积极职业评估15最终版的心理测量特性

Psychometric properties of the Assessment of Positive Occupation 15 final version in individuals with mental illness.

作者信息

Noguchi Takuya, Kyougoku Makoto

机构信息

Health and Welfare Research Institute, Kibi International University, Japan.

Zikei Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2021 Jun;34(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/1569186120985413. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1177/1569186120985413
PMID:34408554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8366210/
Abstract

AIMS

This study was to test the reliability and validity of the Assessment of Positive Occupational 15 (APO-15) for individuals experiencing mental illness.

METHODS

A sample of 408 people experiencing mental illness living in communities or admitted to hospitalized was recruited. The sample has completed demographic information, the Assessment of Positive Occupation 15 (APO-15), the Japanese version of the Self-identified Stage of Recovery Part-B (SISR-B), the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS), the General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12). APO-15 is a measure of how engaged one is in occupations that promote well-being. The final version of the APO-15 was developed by assessing the validity and reliability by mainly using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), item response theory (IRT).

RESULTS

This study indicated satisfactory the validity and reliability of APO-15 in a group of individuals experiencing mental illness. CFA showed acceptable values for all indices of fit, namely comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) (i.e., greater than .90), and the value of root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was .087, which was acceptable. The IRT showed satisfactory responses for the item slope parameter (α) and item difficulty parameter (β) in APO-15.

DISCUSSION

APO-15 was demonstrated good psychometric properties in measuring involvement in the occupation to promote well-being in individuals experiencing mental illness. In conclusion, the APO-15 is an important tool to enable occupational therapists to assess clients who are not engaged in well-being promoting occupations and thus enable them to participate in such occupations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验积极职业评估量表15(APO - 15)对患有精神疾病个体的信度和效度。

方法

招募了408名居住在社区或住院的患有精神疾病的人作为样本。该样本完成了人口统计学信息、积极职业评估量表15(APO - 15)、日语版自我认定康复阶段 - B(SISR - B)、日语版康复评估量表(RAS)、一般健康问卷12(GHQ - 12)。APO - 15是一种衡量个体参与促进幸福感职业程度的量表。APO - 15的最终版本主要通过验证性因素分析(CFA)、项目反应理论(IRT)评估效度和信度而开发。

结果

本研究表明APO - 15在患有精神疾病的个体群体中具有令人满意的效度和信度。CFA显示所有拟合指数的值均可接受,即比较拟合指数(CFI)、塔克 - 刘易斯指数(TLI)(即大于0.90),近似误差均方根(RMSEA)值为0.087,这是可接受的。IRT显示APO - 15中项目斜率参数(α)和项目难度参数(β)的反应令人满意。

讨论

APO - 15在测量患有精神疾病个体参与促进幸福感职业方面表现出良好的心理测量特性。总之,APO - 15是职业治疗师评估未参与促进幸福感职业的客户并使其能够参与此类职业的重要工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4632/8366210/3b0584277540/10.1177_1569186120985413-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4632/8366210/42462d607405/10.1177_1569186120985413-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4632/8366210/3b0584277540/10.1177_1569186120985413-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4632/8366210/42462d607405/10.1177_1569186120985413-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4632/8366210/3b0584277540/10.1177_1569186120985413-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Assessment of Positive Occupation 15 final version in individuals with mental illness.精神疾病患者中积极职业评估15最终版的心理测量特性
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2021 Jun;34(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/1569186120985413. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Adaptation of the Assessment of Positive Occupation-15 (APO-15) in Serious Mental Illness.《积极职业评估量表 -15(APO - 15)土耳其语改编版在严重精神疾病中的效度与信度》
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2025 Apr;45(2):179-188. doi: 10.1177/15394492241265377. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among people with mental illness living in the community.社区精神疾病患者心理健康自我管理问卷的日本版信度和效度。
BMC Psychol. 2019 May 22;7(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0301-4.
4
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
5
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
6
The Processes of Change Scale: A Confirmatory Study of the Malay Language Version.《改变过程量表:马来语版本的验证性研究》
Malays J Med Sci. 2020 May;27(3):125-136. doi: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.3.13. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
7
Assessing knowledge and attitudes about mental illness in Ningxia, China.评估中国宁夏地区对精神疾病的认知和态度。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;55(1):94-119. doi: 10.1177/1363461517748847. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0.12项世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0波兰语版的心理测量特性及效度验证
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):1203. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09305-0.
9
Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the satisfaction with life scale in a sample of individuals with mental illness.在患有精神疾病的个体样本中,生活满意度量表瑞典语版本的心理测量特性。
PeerJ. 2021 May 12;9:e11432. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11432. eCollection 2021.
10
Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chinese Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) in women with breast cancer.中文简体版 36 健康调查短表第二版(SF-36v2)在女性乳腺癌患者中的信度、效度和灵敏度。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;25(5):864-872. doi: 10.1111/jep.13088. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Assessment of Positive Occupation 15 for individuals with physical illness.针对身体疾病患者的积极职业评估15的心理测量特性。
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2024 Dec 19;38(1):3-14. doi: 10.1177/15691861241295339. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Balancing Everyday Life (BEL) versus standard occupational therapy for activity engagement and functioning among people with mental illness - a cluster RCT study.平衡日常生活(BEL)与标准职业疗法对精神疾病患者活动参与和功能的效果比较 - 一项群组 RCT 研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1524-7.
2
The factor structure of the 12-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) in young Chinese civil servants.12项一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)在中国年轻公务员中的因子结构。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 26;14(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0539-y.
3
Item response theory for measurement validity.
用于测量效度的项目反应理论。
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;26(3):171-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.03.010.
4
Application of the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool (MOHOST Assessment) in an Acute Psychiatric Setting.人类作业筛选工具模型(MOHOST评估)在急性精神科环境中的应用。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2008;22(2-3):63-75. doi: 10.1080/07380570801989465.
5
Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment.诊断测试评估中的受试者工作特征曲线。
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Sep;5(9):1315-6. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d.
6
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Self-Identified Stage of Recovery for people with long term mental illness.《长程精神疾病患者自我认同康复阶段量表》日文版的信度和效度。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Jun;19(3):195-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2009.00656.x.
7
Gratitude and well-being: a review and theoretical integration.感激与幸福感:综述与理论整合。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;30(7):890-905. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
8
Beyond flow: temporality and participation in everyday activities.超越流动:日常生活活动中的时间性与参与
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Jan-Feb;64(1):152-63. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.1.152.
9
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
10
Altuism, happiness, and health: it's good to be good.利他主义、幸福与健康:为善有益。
Int J Behav Med. 2005;12(2):66-77. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1202_4.