Guth Stefan, D'Armini Andrea M, Delcroix Marion, Nakayama Kazuhiko, Fadel Elie, Hoole Stephen P, Jenkins David P, Kiely David G, Kim Nick H, Lang Irene M, Madani Michael M, Matsubara Hiromi, Ogawa Aiko, Ota-Arakaki Jaquelina S, Quarck Rozenn, Sadushi-Kolici Roela, Simonneau Gérald, Wiedenroth Christoph B, Yildizeli Bedrettin, Mayer Eckhard, Pepke-Zaba Joanna
Dept of Thoracic Surgery, Kerckhoff Heart and Lung Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Cardiac Surgery, Heart-Lung Transplantation and CTEPH, University of Pavia, School of Medicine, Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Aug 16;7(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00850-2020. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) are currently accepted therapies for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This international CTEPH Registry identifies clinical characteristics of patients, diagnostic algorithms and treatment decisions in a global context.
1010 newly diagnosed consecutive patients were included in the registry between February 2015 and September 2016. Diagnosis was confirmed by right heart catheterisation, ventilation-perfusion lung scan, computerised pulmonary angiography and/or invasive pulmonary angiography after at least 3 months on anticoagulation.
Overall, 649 patients (64.3%) were considered for PEA, 193 (19.1%) for BPA, 20 (2.0%) for both PEA and BPA, and 148 (14.7%) for PAH therapy only. Reasons for PEA inoperability were technical inaccessibility (n=235), comorbidities (n=63) and patient refusal (n=44). In Europe and America and other countries (AAO), 72% of patients were deemed suitable for PEA, whereas in Japan, 70% of patients were offered BPA as first choice. Sex was evenly balanced, except in Japan where 75% of patients were female. A history of acute pulmonary embolism was reported for 65.6% of patients. At least one PAH therapy was initiated in 35.8% of patients (26.2% of PEA candidates, 54.5% of BPA candidates and 54.1% of those not eligible for either PEA or BPA). At the time of analysis, 39 patients (3.9%) had died of pulmonary hypertension-related causes (3.5% after PEA and 1.8% after BPA).
The registry revealed noticeable differences in patient characteristics (rates of pulmonary embolism and sex) and therapeutic approaches in Japan compared with Europe and AAO.
肺动脉内膜剥脱术(PEA)、肺动脉高压(PAH)治疗及球囊肺动脉血管成形术(BPA)是目前公认的慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)治疗方法。这个国际CTEPH注册研究确定了全球范围内患者的临床特征、诊断算法及治疗决策。
2015年2月至2016年9月期间,1010例新诊断的连续患者被纳入该注册研究。在抗凝至少3个月后,通过右心导管检查、通气-灌注肺扫描、计算机断层肺动脉造影和/或有创肺动脉造影确诊。
总体而言,649例患者(64.3%)被考虑行PEA,193例(19.1%)行BPA,20例(2.0%)同时行PEA和BPA,148例(14.7%)仅接受PAH治疗。PEA不可行的原因包括技术上无法到达(n = 235)、合并症(n = 63)及患者拒绝(n = 44)。在欧美等国家(AAO),72%的患者被认为适合PEA,而在日本,70%的患者首选BPA。除日本75%的患者为女性外,性别分布均衡。65.6%的患者报告有急性肺栓塞病史。35.8%的患者开始至少一种PAH治疗(PEA候选患者中的26.2%、BPA候选患者中的54.5%以及既不适合PEA也不适合BPA的患者中的54.1%)。在分析时,39例患者(3.9%)死于肺动脉高压相关原因(PEA后为3.5%,BPA后为1.8%)。
该注册研究显示,与欧美及AAO相比,日本患者的特征(肺栓塞发生率和性别)及治疗方法存在显著差异。