Shadmani Athar, Razmkhah Mahboobeh, Jalalpoor Mohammad Hassan, Lari Sina Yazdanpanah, Eghtedari Masoomeh
Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 5;33(2):136-142. doi: 10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_246_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
To compare the effects of two types of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), activated omental cells (AOCs), and adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) in the healing process of animal model of ocular surface alkali injury.
An alkaline burn was induced on the ocular surfaces of eighteen rats divided randomly into three groups. The first and second groups received subconjunctival AOCs and ADSCs, respectively. The control group received normal saline subconjunctival injection. On the 90 day after the injury, the eyes were examined using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Corneal neovascularization and scarring were graded in a masked fashion. Histological evaluation of the corneal scar was performed, and the number of inflammatory cells was evaluated.
Corneal neovascularization scores revealed higher neovascularization in the control (0.49 ± 0.12) than the AOC (0.80 ± 0.20, = 0.01) and ADSC groups (0.84 ± 0.24, = 0.007). There were no statistically significant differences between the neovascularization score of the AOC and ADSC groups ( > 0.05). According to histologic evaluation, stromal infiltration was significantly more in the control group compared to AOC and ADSC groups ( < 0.05).
Our results suggest that MSCs, even with different sources, can be used to promote wound healing after corneal chemical burns. However, the ease of harvesting ADSC from more superficial fat sources makes this method more clinically applicable.
比较两种间充质干细胞(MSCs)、活化网膜细胞(AOCs)和脂肪组织来源干细胞(ADSCs)在眼表碱烧伤动物模型愈合过程中的作用。
将18只大鼠随机分为三组,在其眼表造成碱烧伤。第一组和第二组分别结膜下注射AOCs和ADSCs。对照组结膜下注射生理盐水。伤后90天,用裂隙灯生物显微镜检查眼睛。以盲法对角膜新生血管和瘢痕进行分级。对角膜瘢痕进行组织学评估,并评估炎症细胞数量。
角膜新生血管评分显示,对照组(0.49±0.12)的新生血管程度高于AOC组(0.80±0.20,P = 0.01)和ADSC组(0.84±0.24,P = 0.007)。AOC组和ADSC组的新生血管评分之间无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。根据组织学评估,与AOC组和ADSC组相比,对照组的基质浸润明显更多(P<0.05)。
我们的结果表明,即使来源不同,间充质干细胞也可用于促进角膜化学烧伤后的伤口愈合。然而,从更浅表的脂肪来源获取ADSC更容易,使得这种方法在临床上更具适用性。