School of Physical Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 19(A) Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 101400, People's Republic of China.
Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 1, Jinlian Road, Longwan District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, People's Republic of China.
Phys Rev E. 2021 Jul;104(1-1):014408. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.014408.
The high fidelity of DNA polymerase (DNAP) is critical for the faithful replication of DNA. There are several quantitative approaches to measure DNAP fidelity. Directly counting the error frequency in the replication products gives the true fidelity but it turns out very hard to implement in practice. Two biochemical kinetic approaches, the steady-state assay and the transient-state assay, were then suggested and widely adopted. In these assays, the error frequency is indirectly estimated by using kinetic theories combined with the measured apparent kinetic rates. However, whether it is equivalent to the true fidelity has never been clarified theoretically, and in particular there are different strategies using these assays to quantify the proofreading efficiency of DNAP but often lead to inconsistent results. In this paper, we make a comprehensive examination on the theoretical foundation of the two kinetic assays, based on the theory of DNAP fidelity recently proposed by us. Our studies show that while the conventional kinetic assays are generally valid to quantify the discrimination efficiency of DNAP, they are valid to quantify the proofreading efficiency of DNAP only when the kinetic parameters satisfy some constraints which will be given explicitly in this paper. These results may inspire more carefully-designed experiments to quantify DNAP fidelity.
DNA 聚合酶(DNAP)的高保真度对于 DNA 的忠实复制至关重要。有几种定量方法可以测量 DNAP 的保真度。直接计算复制产物中的错误频率可以得到真实的保真度,但实际上很难实现。随后提出并广泛采用了两种生化动力学方法,即稳态测定法和瞬态测定法。在这些测定中,通过将动力学理论与测量的表观动力学速率相结合,间接估计错误频率。然而,它是否与真实保真度在理论上等效从未得到明确澄清,特别是使用这些测定来定量 DNAP 的校对效率有不同的策略,但通常会导致不一致的结果。在本文中,我们根据我们最近提出的 DNAP 保真度理论,对这两种动力学测定的理论基础进行了全面检查。我们的研究表明,虽然传统的动力学测定通常可以有效地定量 DNAP 的区分效率,但只有当动力学参数满足本文中明确给出的一些约束条件时,它们才能有效地定量 DNAP 的校对效率。这些结果可能会激发更精心设计的实验来定量 DNAP 的保真度。