Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022 Apr;25(4):604-614. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00437-x. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
There is conflicting evidence on the association between asbestos exposure and prostate cancer (PCa). Two recent meta-analyses have claimed that exposure is associated with increased PCa incidence and mortality, but they suffer from some methodological flaws. Given the potential importance of this research question, we aimed to perform a methodologically sound systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between occupational asbestos exposure and the incidence of and mortality from PCa.
We followed PRISMA guidelines to systematically search for pertinent articles in three relevant electronic databases: Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase, from their inception to July 2020. The methodological quality of included articles was evaluated using the US National Institutes of Health tool. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for PCa, as well as respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were extracted or calculated for each included cohort. Main and subgroup meta-analyses according to first year of employment, industry, asbestos type, and geographic region were performed.
Sixty-five articles comprising 68 cohorts were included. PCa incidence and mortality were not significantly associated with occupational asbestos exposure (pooled SIR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00-1.13, P = 0.062; pooled SMR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.06, P = 0.115). PCa incidence was higher among workers employed after 1960 (SIR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20). Pooled SIR was elevated in European (SIR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.18) and UK cohorts (SIR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.09). Mortality was elevated in North American cohorts (SMR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10). Studies of lower methodological quality appeared to yield elevated SIRs or SMRs.
This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that men with occupational asbestos exposure have a PCa incidence and mortality similar to that of the general population. Temporal and geographical variables seem to be related to higher SMR or SIR.
石棉暴露与前列腺癌(PCa)之间的关联存在相互矛盾的证据。最近的两项荟萃分析声称,暴露与 PCa 的发病率和死亡率增加有关,但它们存在一些方法学上的缺陷。鉴于这个研究问题的潜在重要性,我们旨在进行一项方法学上合理的系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查职业性石棉暴露与 PCa 的发病率和死亡率之间的关系。
我们遵循 PRISMA 指南,在三个相关的电子数据库(Pubmed、Scopus 和 Embase)中系统地搜索相关文章,检索时间从数据库成立到 2020 年 7 月。使用美国国立卫生研究院的工具评估纳入文章的方法学质量。为每个纳入的队列提取或计算 PCa 的标准化发病比(SIR)和标准化死亡比(SMR)及其相应的 95%置信区间(CI)。根据就业的第一年、行业、石棉类型和地理区域进行主要和亚组荟萃分析。
共有 65 篇文章包含 68 个队列被纳入。职业性石棉暴露与 PCa 的发病率和死亡率无显著相关性(汇总 SIR:1.06,95%CI:1.00-1.13,P=0.062;汇总 SMR:1.03,95%CI:0.99-1.06,P=0.115)。1960 年后就业的工人中 PCa 的发病率较高(SIR:1.10,95%CI:1.01-1.20)。欧洲(SIR:1.09,95%CI:1.01-1.18)和英国队列(SIR:1.05,95%CI:1.02-1.09)的汇总 SIR 升高。北美队列的死亡率升高(SMR:1.06,95%CI:1.02-1.10)。方法学质量较低的研究似乎产生了较高的 SIR 或 SMR。
本系统评价和荟萃分析提供的证据表明,职业性石棉暴露的男性与一般人群的 PCa 发病率和死亡率相似。时间和地理变量似乎与较高的 SMR 或 SIR 有关。