Alemseged Fana, Campbell Bruce C V
Department of Medicine and Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 6;12:678887. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.678887. eCollection 2021.
One in five ischaemic strokes affects the posterior circulation. Basilar artery occlusion is a type of posterior circulation stroke associated with a high risk of disability and mortality. Despite its proven efficacy in ischaemic stroke more generally, alteplase only achieves rapid reperfusion in ~4% of basilar artery occlusion patients. Tenecteplase is a genetically modified variant of alteplase with greater fibrin specificity and longer half-life than alteplase, which can be administered by intravenous bolus. The single-bolus administration of tenecteplase vs. an hour-long alteplase infusion is a major practical advantage, particularly in "drip and ship" patients with basilar artery occlusion who are being transported between hospitals. Other practical advantages include its reduced cost compared to alteplase. The EXTEND-IA TNK trial demonstrated that tenecteplase led to higher reperfusion rates prior to endovascular therapy (22 vs. 10%, non-inferiority = 0.002, superiority = 0.03) and improved functional outcomes (ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale, common odds ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.8, = 0.04) compared with alteplase in large-vessel occlusion ischaemic strokes. We recently demonstrated in observational data that tenecteplase was associated with increased reperfusion rates compared to alteplase prior to endovascular therapy in basilar artery occlusion [26% ( = 5/19) of patients thrombolysed with TNK vs. 7% ( = 6/91) thrombolysed with alteplase (RR 4.0 95% CI 1.3-12; = 0.02)]. Although randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results, tenecteplase can be considered as an alternative to alteplase in patients with basilar artery occlusion, particularly in "drip and ship" patients.
五分之一的缺血性中风影响后循环。基底动脉闭塞是一种后循环中风,与高致残率和死亡率相关。尽管阿替普酶在一般缺血性中风中已被证明有效,但在基底动脉闭塞患者中,只有约4%的患者能通过它实现快速再灌注。替奈普酶是阿替普酶的基因改造变体,与阿替普酶相比,具有更高的纤维蛋白特异性和更长的半衰期,可通过静脉推注给药。替奈普酶单次推注与阿替普酶长达一小时的输注相比,具有一个主要的实际优势,特别是对于在医院之间转运的基底动脉闭塞“边滴注边转运”的患者。其他实际优势包括与阿替普酶相比成本更低。EXTEND-IA TNK试验表明,在大血管闭塞性缺血性中风中,与阿替普酶相比,替奈普酶在血管内治疗前导致更高的再灌注率(分别为22%和10%,非劣效性P = 0.002,优越性P = 0.03),并改善了功能结局(改良Rankin量表的序贯分析,共同优势比1.7,95%CI 1.0 - 2.8,P = 0.04)。我们最近在观察性数据中表明,在基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗前,与阿替普酶相比,替奈普酶与更高的再灌注率相关[用替奈普酶溶栓的患者中有26%(n = 5/19),用阿替普酶溶栓的患者中有7%(n = 6/91)(RR 4.0,95%CI 1.3 - 12;P = 0.02)]。尽管需要随机对照试验来证实这些结果,但对于基底动脉闭塞患者,尤其是“边滴注边转运”的患者,可考虑将替奈普酶作为阿替普酶的替代药物。