• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Intravenous Tenecteplase Dose on Cerebral Reperfusion Before Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: The EXTEND-IA TNK Part 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.静脉注射替奈普酶剂量对大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者取栓前脑再灌注的影响:EXTEND-IA TNK 第 2 部分随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1257-1265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1511.
2
Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke.替奈普酶与阿替普酶在缺血性脑卒中取栓前的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1573-1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716405.
3
Determining the optimal dose of tenecteplase before endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke (EXTEND-IA TNK Part 2): A multicenter, randomized, controlled study.在缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗前确定替奈普酶的最佳剂量(EXTEND-IA TNK 第 2 部分):一项多中心、随机、对照研究。
Int J Stroke. 2020 Jul;15(5):567-572. doi: 10.1177/1747493019879652. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase Compared With Alteplase in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the ACT Randomized Clinical Trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗大血管闭塞性卒中患者的安全性和有效性:ACT 随机临床试验的预先设定的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Aug 1;80(8):824-832. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.2094.
5
Tenecteplase versus alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy (EXTEND-IA TNK): A multicenter, randomized, controlled study.替奈普酶与血管内血栓切除术前的阿替普酶(EXTEND-IA TNK):一项多中心、随机、对照研究。
Int J Stroke. 2018 Apr;13(3):328-334. doi: 10.1177/1747493017733935. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase in Older Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Pooled Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials.替奈普酶在老年大血管闭塞患者中的安全性和有效性:EXTEND-IA TNK试验的汇总分析
Neurology. 2022 Mar 22;98(12):e1292-e1301. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013302. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Tenecteplase Bolus in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results of Two Open-Label, Multicenter Trials.急性缺血性脑卒中静脉注射替奈普酶推注的疗效和安全性:两项开放标签、多中心试验的结果。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2018 Oct;18(5):387-395. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0284-1.
8
Effect of Intra-arterial Alteplase vs Placebo Following Successful Thrombectomy on Functional Outcomes in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke: The CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.成功取栓后动脉内注射阿替普酶与安慰剂对大血管闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响:CHOICE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Mar 1;327(9):826-835. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1645.
9
Endovascular thrombectomy versus standard bridging thrombolytic with endovascular thrombectomy within 4·5 h of stroke onset: an open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised non-inferiority trial.血管内血栓切除术与标准桥接溶栓联合血管内血栓切除术治疗脑卒中发病 4.5 小时内的随机非劣效性试验:开放标签、盲终点、随机对照研究。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 9;400(10346):116-125. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00564-5.
10
Effect of Endovascular Treatment Alone vs Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment on Functional Independence in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The DEVT Randomized Clinical Trial.单纯血管内治疗与静脉溶栓联合血管内治疗对急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能独立性的影响:DEVT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):234-243. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23523.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.替奈普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Brain Behav. 2025 Sep;15(9):e70791. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70791.
2
Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the Korean Stroke Society.替奈普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中:韩国卒中协会科学声明
J Clin Neurol. 2025 Sep;21(5):384-396. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2025.0210.
3
A narrative review of reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke: Emerging advances, current challenges, and future directions.急性缺血性卒中再灌注治疗的叙述性综述:新进展、当前挑战及未来方向
Brain Circ. 2025 Jun 9;11(3):187-199. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_161_24. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
4
Tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.急性缺血性脑卒中患者使用替奈普酶与阿替普酶的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 8;30(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02983-9.
5
Tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a new era in thrombolysis.替奈普酶用于急性缺血性卒中:溶栓治疗的新时代。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2025 May;83(5):1-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1808088. Epub 2025 Jun 1.
6
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: development and update.急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗:进展与更新
Brain Commun. 2025 Apr 28;7(3):fcaf164. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf164. eCollection 2025.
7
Effect of Thrombolytics on Delayed Reperfusion After Incomplete Thrombectomy: Target Trial Emulation.溶栓剂对不完全血栓切除术术后延迟再灌注的影响:目标试验模拟
Neurology. 2025 May 27;104(10):e213641. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213641. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
8
Tenecteplase is here: navigating the shift of a stroke thrombolytic in the United States prior to FDA approval: a mini-review on rationale, barriers, and pathways.替奈普酶来了:在美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准之前应对中风溶栓药物的转变:关于理论依据、障碍和途径的小型综述
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 2;16:1563423. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1563423. eCollection 2025.
9
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.替奈普酶与阿替普酶用于急性缺血性卒中伴大血管闭塞患者静脉溶栓的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1487711. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1487711. eCollection 2025.
10
Impact of different doses of intravenous alteplase on neuroinjury biomarker levels in patients with acute ischemic stroke and stress hyperglycemia.不同剂量静脉注射阿替普酶对急性缺血性卒中合并应激性高血糖患者神经损伤生物标志物水平的影响
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 28;104(13):e41825. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041825.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
2
Noninferiority Margins in Trials of Thrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Is the Bar Being Set Too Low?急性缺血性脑卒中取栓装置试验中的非劣效性边界:设定的标准是否过低?
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):3519-3526. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026717. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
Determining the optimal dose of tenecteplase before endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke (EXTEND-IA TNK Part 2): A multicenter, randomized, controlled study.在缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗前确定替奈普酶的最佳剂量(EXTEND-IA TNK 第 2 部分):一项多中心、随机、对照研究。
Int J Stroke. 2020 Jul;15(5):567-572. doi: 10.1177/1747493019879652. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
4
Evidence that Tenecteplase Is Noninferior to Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Meta-Analysis of 5 Randomized Trials.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中非劣效性的证据:5 项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2156-2162. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025080. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
5
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) - European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic StrokeEndorsed by Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE).欧洲卒中组织(ESO)-欧洲微创神经治疗学会(ESMINT)急性缺血性卒中机械取栓指南,由欧洲卒中联盟(SAFE)认可。
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Mar;4(1):6-12. doi: 10.1177/2396987319832140. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
6
Safety and Outcomes of Tenecteplase in Moderate and Severe Ischemic Stroke.替奈普酶治疗中重度缺血性脑卒中的安全性和结局。
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1279-1281. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025041.
7
Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.血管内血栓切除术与药物治疗治疗前循环缺血性卒中患者的半影成像和功能结局:个体患者水平数据的荟萃分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan;18(1):46-55. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30314-4. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
8
eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy.血管内卒中治疗中的再灌注:定义成功。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 May;11(5):433-438. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014127. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
9
Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke.替奈普酶与阿替普酶在缺血性脑卒中取栓前的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1573-1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716405.
10
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischaemic stroke (NOR-TEST): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的比较(NOR-TEST):一项 3 期、随机、开放标签、盲终点试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Oct;16(10):781-788. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30253-3. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

静脉注射替奈普酶剂量对大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者取栓前脑再灌注的影响:EXTEND-IA TNK 第 2 部分随机临床试验。

Effect of Intravenous Tenecteplase Dose on Cerebral Reperfusion Before Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: The EXTEND-IA TNK Part 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1257-1265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1511.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.1511
PMID:32078683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7139271/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase improves reperfusion prior to endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke compared with alteplase.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether 0.40 mg/kg of tenecteplase safely improves reperfusion before endovascular thrombectomy vs 0.25 mg/kg of tenecteplase in patients with large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial at 27 hospitals in Australia and 1 in New Zealand using open-label treatment and blinded assessment of radiological and clinical outcomes. Patients were enrolled from December 2017 to July 2019 with follow-up until October 2019. Adult patients (N = 300) with ischemic stroke due to occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid, \basilar, or middle cerebral artery were included less than 4.5 hours after symptom onset using standard intravenous thrombolysis eligibility criteria.

INTERVENTIONS

Open-label tenecteplase at 0.40 mg/kg (maximum, 40 mg; n = 150) or 0.25 mg/kg (maximum, 25 mg; n = 150) given as a bolus before endovascular thrombectomy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was reperfusion of greater than 50% of the involved ischemic territory prior to thrombectomy, assessed by consensus of 2 blinded neuroradiologists. Prespecified secondary outcomes were level of disability at day 90 (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score; range, 0-6); mRS score of 0 to 1 (freedom from disability) or no change from baseline at 90 days; mRS score of 0 to 2 (functional independence) or no change from baseline at 90 days; substantial neurological improvement at 3 days; symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours; and all-cause death.

RESULTS

All 300 patients who were randomized (mean age, 72.7 years; 141 [47%] women) completed the trial. The number of participants with greater than 50% reperfusion of the previously occluded vascular territory was 29 of 150 (19.3%) in the 0.40 mg/kg group vs 29 of 150 (19.3%) in the 0.25 mg/kg group (unadjusted risk difference, 0.0% [95% CI, -8.9% to -8.9%]; adjusted risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.66-1.61]; P = .89). Among the 6 secondary outcomes, there were no significant differences in any of the 4 functional outcomes between the 0.40 mg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg groups nor in all-cause deaths (26 [17%] vs 22 [15%]; unadjusted risk difference, 2.7% [95% CI, -5.6% to 11.0%]) or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (7 [4.7%] vs 2 [1.3%]; unadjusted risk difference, 3.3% [95% CI, -0.5% to 7.2%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke, a dose of 0.40 mg/kg, compared with 0.25 mg/kg, of tenecteplase did not significantly improve cerebral reperfusion prior to endovascular thrombectomy. The findings suggest that the 0.40-mg/kg dose of tenecteplase does not confer an advantage over the 0.25-mg/kg dose in patients with large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke in whom endovascular thrombectomy is planned.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03340493.

摘要

重要性:与阿替普酶相比,替奈普酶静脉溶栓可改善血管内血栓切除术治疗缺血性脑卒中前的再灌注。

目的:确定在计划进行血管内血栓切除术的大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者中,与 0.25mg/kg 替奈普酶相比,0.40mg/kg 替奈普酶是否能更安全地改善血管内血栓切除术前的再灌注。

设计、地点和参与者:在澳大利亚 27 家医院和新西兰 1 家医院进行的随机临床试验,使用开放标签治疗和盲法评估影像学和临床结局。2017 年 12 月至 2019 年 7 月期间招募患者,随访至 2019 年 10 月。使用标准静脉溶栓入选标准,将小于 4.5 小时起病的颅内颈内动脉、基底动脉或大脑中动脉闭塞的成人(N=300)患者纳入研究。

干预措施:血管内血栓切除术前给予开放标签替奈普酶 0.40mg/kg(最大剂量 40mg;n=150)或 0.25mg/kg(最大剂量 25mg;n=150),作为推注给药。

主要结局和测量指标:主要结局是由 2 位盲法神经放射学家一致评估的血管内血栓切除术前大于受累缺血区域 50%的再灌注程度。预先设定的次要结局是 90 天的残疾程度(改良 Rankin 量表[mRS]评分;范围 0-6);90 天时 mRS 评分为 0 至 1(无残疾)或与基线相比无变化;90 天时 mRS 评分为 0 至 2(功能独立)或与基线相比无变化;3 天内有明显的神经改善;36 小时内症状性颅内出血;以及全因死亡。

结果:所有 300 名随机分组的患者(平均年龄 72.7 岁;141[47%]名女性)均完成了试验。0.40mg/kg 组和 0.25mg/kg 组中,闭塞血管前大于 50%再灌注的患者人数分别为 150 例中的 29 例(19.3%)和 150 例中的 29 例(19.3%)(未调整的风险差异,0.0%[95%CI,-8.9%至-8.9%];调整后的风险比,1.03[95%CI,0.66-1.61];P=0.89)。在 6 项次要结局中,0.40mg/kg 组和 0.25mg/kg 组之间,4 项功能结局均无显著差异,全因死亡率也无显著差异(26[17%]vs 22[15%];未调整的风险差异,2.7%[95%CI,-5.6%至 11.0%])或症状性颅内出血(7[4.7%]vs 2[1.3%];未调整的风险差异,3.3%[95%CI,-0.5%至 7.2%])。

结论和相关性:在大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者中,与 0.25mg/kg 相比,0.40mg/kg 剂量的替奈普酶并未显著改善血管内血栓切除术前的脑再灌注。这些发现表明,在计划进行血管内血栓切除术的大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中患者中,与 0.25mg/kg 相比,0.40mg/kg 剂量的替奈普酶并没有优势。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03340493。