Suppr超能文献

评估用于混凝土、化学制品和矿物生产的碳利用的相对气候影响。

Assessing the Relative Climate Impact of Carbon Utilization for Concrete, Chemical, and Mineral Production.

机构信息

Center for Sustainable Systems (CSS), School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS), University of Michigan, 440 Church Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 15013 Denver W Pkwy, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Sep 7;55(17):12019-12031. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01109. Epub 2021 Aug 22.

Abstract

Estimates show that 6.2 gigatons of carbon dioxide (CO) can be captured and utilized across three pathways, concrete, chemical, and minerals, by 2050. However, it is difficult to compare the climate benefit across these three carbon capture and utilization (CCU) pathways to determine the most effective use of captured CO. The life cycle assessment methods to evaluate the climate benefit of CCU chemicals should additionally account for the change in material properties of concrete due to CO utilization. Furthermore, with most CO utilization technologies being in the early stages of research and development, the uncertainty and variability in process and inventory data present a significant challenge in evaluating the climate benefit. We present a stochastically determined climate return on investment (ROI) metric to rank and prioritize CO utilization across 20 concrete, chemical and mineral pathways based on the realized climate benefit. We show that two concrete pathways, which use CO during concrete mixing, and two chemical pathways, which produce formic acid through hydrogenation of CO and carbon monoxide through dry reforming of methane, generate the greatest climate ROI and are the only CCU pathways with a higher likelihood of generating a climate benefit than a climate burden.

摘要

据估计,到 2050 年,通过混凝土、化学和矿物三种途径,可以捕获和利用 62 亿吨二氧化碳(CO)。然而,很难比较这三种碳捕获和利用(CCU)途径的气候效益,以确定捕获的 CO 的最有效利用方式。评估 CCU 化学品气候效益的生命周期评估方法还应考虑由于 CO 利用而导致的混凝土材料性能的变化。此外,由于大多数 CO 利用技术仍处于研究和开发的早期阶段,因此在评估气候效益时,过程和清单数据中的不确定性和可变性是一个重大挑战。我们提出了一个随机确定的气候投资回报率(ROI)指标,以根据实现的气候效益对 20 种混凝土、化学和矿物途径的 CO 利用进行排名和优先级排序。结果表明,两种混凝土途径,即在混凝土混合过程中使用 CO,以及两种化学途径,即通过 CO 和一氧化碳的氢化生产甲酸,以及通过甲烷的干法重整生产甲酸,产生了最大的气候 ROI,并且是唯一两种 CCU 途径,其产生气候效益的可能性高于产生气候负担的可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验