Suppr超能文献

女性为户主家庭中的儿童处于劣势吗?对95个低收入和中等收入国家免疫接种覆盖率及发育迟缓患病率的分析。

Are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? An analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence: in 95 low- and middle-income countries.

作者信息

Wendt Andrea, Hellwig Franciele, Saad Ghada E, Faye Cheikh, Mokomane Zitha, Boerma Ties, Barros Aluisio J D, Victora Cesar

机构信息

International Center for Equity in Health, Postgraduate Program of Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2021 Aug 5;15:100888. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100888. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Studies of inequalities in child health have given limited attention to household structure and headship. The few existing reports on child outcomes in male and female-headed households have produced inconsistent results. The aim of our analyses was to provide a global view of the influence of sex of the household head on child health in cross-sectional surveys from up to 95 LMICs. Studied outcomes were full immunization coverage in children aged 12-23 months and stunting prevalence in under-five children. We analyzed the most recent nationally-representative surveys for each country (since 2010) with available data. After initial exploratory analyses, we focused on three types of households: a) male-headed household (MHH) comprised 73.1% of all households in the pooled analyses; b) female Headed Household (FHH) with at least one adult male represented 9.8% of households; and c) FHH without an adult male accounted for 15.0% of households. Our analyses also included the following covariates: wealth index, education of the child's mother and urban/rural residence. Meta-analytic approaches were used to calculate pooled effects across the countries with MHH as the reference category. Regarding full immunization, the pooled prevalence ratio for FHH (any male) was 0.99 (0.97; 1.01) and that for FHH (no male) was 0.99 (0.97; 1.02). For stunting prevalence, the pooled prevalence ratio for FHH (any male) was 1.00 (0.98; 1.02) and for FHH (no male) was 1.00 (0.98; 1.02). Adjustment for covariates did not lead to any noteworthy change in the results. No particular patterns were found among different world regions. A few countries presented significant inequalities with different directions of association, indicating the diversity of FHH and how complex the meaning and measurement of household headship may be. Further research is warranted to understand context, examine mediating factors, and exploring alternative definitions of household headship in countries with some association.

摘要

关于儿童健康不平等的研究对家庭结构和户主情况关注有限。现有的少数关于男女户主家庭儿童健康结果的报告结果并不一致。我们分析的目的是在多达95个低收入和中等收入国家的横断面调查中,全面了解户主性别对儿童健康的影响。研究的结果是12至23个月儿童的全程免疫覆盖率以及五岁以下儿童的发育迟缓患病率。我们分析了每个国家(自2010年以来)有可用数据的最新全国代表性调查。经过初步探索性分析后,我们重点关注三种类型的家庭:a)男户主家庭(MHH)在汇总分析中占所有家庭的73.1%;b)有至少一名成年男性的女户主家庭(FHH)占家庭的9.8%;c)没有成年男性的女户主家庭占家庭的15.0%。我们的分析还包括以下协变量:财富指数、儿童母亲的教育程度以及城乡居住地。采用荟萃分析方法计算以MHH为参照组的各国汇总效应。关于全程免疫,有男性的FHH的汇总患病率比值为0.99(0.97;1.01),无男性的FHH的汇总患病率比值为0.99(0.97;1.02)。对于发育迟缓患病率,有男性的FHH的汇总患病率比值为1.00(0.98;1.02),无男性的FHH的汇总患病率比值为1.00(0.98;1.02)。对协变量进行调整后,结果没有出现任何显著变化。在不同世界区域未发现特定模式。一些国家呈现出具有不同关联方向的显著不平等,这表明女户主家庭的多样性以及户主情况的含义和衡量可能有多复杂。有必要进行进一步研究,以了解具体情况、研究中介因素,并在存在某种关联的国家探索户主情况的替代定义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17a7/8369002/e8a940946216/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验