• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过故事阅读学习新单词含义:即时测试的益处。

Learning new word meanings from story reading: the benefit of immediate testing.

作者信息

Hulme Rachael C, Rodd Jennifer M

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

Aston Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment and School of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2021 Aug 10;9:e11693. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11693. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.11693
PMID:34434641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8362668/
Abstract

This study investigated how word meanings can be learned from natural story reading. Three experiments with adult participants compared naturalistic incidental learning with intentional learning of new meanings for familiar words, and examined the role of immediate tests in maintaining memory of new word meanings. In Experiment 1, participants learned new meanings for familiar words through incidental (story reading) and intentional (definition training task) conditions. Memory was tested with cued recall of meanings and multiple-choice meaning-to-word matching immediately and 24 h later. Results for both measures showed higher accuracy for intentional learning, which was also more time efficient than incidental learning. However, there was reasonably good learning from both methods, and items learned incidentally through stories appeared less susceptible to forgetting over 24 h. It was possible that retrieval practice at the immediate test may have aided learning and improved memory of new word meanings 24 h later, especially for the incidental story reading condition. Two preregistered experiments then examined the role of immediate testing in long-term retention of new meanings for familiar words. There was a strong testing effect for word meanings learned through intentional and incidental conditions (Experiment 2), which was non-significantly larger for items learned incidentally through stories. Both cued recall and multiple-choice tests were each individually sufficient to enhance retention compared to having no immediate test (Experiment 3), with a larger learning boost from multiple-choice. This research emphasises (i) the resilience of word meanings learned incidentally through stories and (ii) the key role that testing can play in boosting vocabulary learning from story reading.

摘要

本研究调查了如何从自然的故事阅读中学习词义。三项针对成年参与者的实验比较了自然情境下的偶然学习与对熟悉单词新词义的有意学习,并考察了即时测试在维持新词义记忆方面的作用。在实验1中,参与者通过偶然(故事阅读)和有意(定义训练任务)两种条件学习熟悉单词的新词义。通过线索回忆词义和多项选择的词义与单词匹配,在即时和24小时后对记忆进行测试。两种测量方法的结果都显示有意学习的准确率更高,而且有意学习比偶然学习更省时。然而,两种方法都有相当不错的学习效果,通过故事偶然学到的内容在24小时内似乎更不容易遗忘。有可能即时测试中的检索练习有助于学习,并在24小时后提高对新词义的记忆,尤其是在偶然故事阅读条件下。随后的两项预注册实验考察了即时测试在熟悉单词新词义长期保持中的作用。对于通过有意和偶然条件学到的词义,存在很强的测试效应(实验2),通过故事偶然学到的项目的测试效应略大但不显著。与没有即时测试相比,线索回忆和多项选择测试各自都足以增强记忆保持(实验3),多项选择带来的学习提升更大。这项研究强调了(i)通过故事偶然学到的词义的持久性,以及(ii)测试在促进从故事阅读中学习词汇方面可以发挥的关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/fd288e36dc21/peerj-09-11693-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/7bdbdaa524ab/peerj-09-11693-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/0ebf98e17c4b/peerj-09-11693-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/01ea70480054/peerj-09-11693-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/2ab6a9068438/peerj-09-11693-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/c2df3b2d47c3/peerj-09-11693-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/fd288e36dc21/peerj-09-11693-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/7bdbdaa524ab/peerj-09-11693-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/0ebf98e17c4b/peerj-09-11693-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/01ea70480054/peerj-09-11693-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/2ab6a9068438/peerj-09-11693-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/c2df3b2d47c3/peerj-09-11693-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d746/8362668/fd288e36dc21/peerj-09-11693-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning new word meanings from story reading: the benefit of immediate testing.通过故事阅读学习新单词含义:即时测试的益处。
PeerJ. 2021 Aug 10;9:e11693. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11693. eCollection 2021.
2
The Role of Sleep in Learning New Meanings for Familiar Words through Stories.睡眠在通过故事学习熟悉单词新含义中的作用。
J Cogn. 2023 Jun 15;6(1):27. doi: 10.5334/joc.282. eCollection 2023.
3
Vocabulary Learning During Reading: Benefits of Contextual Inferences Versus Retrieval Opportunities.阅读过程中的词汇学习:语境推理与检索机会的益处。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Apr;46(4):e13135. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13135.
4
The effect of recall, reproduction, and restudy on word learning: a pre-registered study.回忆、再现和重学对词汇学习的影响:一项预先注册的研究。
BMC Psychol. 2017 Aug 4;5(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40359-017-0198-8.
5
Intentional Training With Speech Production Supports Children's Learning the Meanings of Foreign Words: A Comparison of Four Learning Tasks.言语产生的有意训练有助于儿童学习外语单词的含义:四种学习任务的比较。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 29;11:1108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01108. eCollection 2020.
6
Learning new meanings for known words: Perturbation of original meanings and retention of new meanings.学习已知单词的新含义:原有含义的扰动与新含义的保留。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):130-144. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0855-z.
7
Learning new meanings for known words: Biphasic effects of prior knowledge.学习已知单词的新含义:先验知识的双相效应。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2017;32(5):637-649. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1252050. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
8
Contextual diversity during word learning through reading benefits generalisation of learned meanings to new contexts.通过阅读在单词学习过程中引入语境多样性有利于将所学词义泛化到新的语境中。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Jul;76(7):1658-1671. doi: 10.1177/17470218221126976. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
9
Diversity of narrative context disrupts the early stage of learning the meanings of novel words.叙述语境的多样性会扰乱学习新词意义的早期阶段。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2338-2350. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02316-z. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
10
Learning Orthographic and Semantic Representations Simultaneously During Shared Reading.在共享阅读过程中同时学习正字法和语义表征
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Mar 17;64(3):909-921. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00520. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Consolidation improves the learning of new meanings for known words but not necessarily their integration into semantic memory.巩固有助于学习已知单词的新含义,但不一定能将其整合到语义记忆中。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024;39(3):351-366. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2293853. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
2
Contextual diversity and anchoring: Null effects on learning word forms and opposing effects on learning word meanings.语境多样性与锚定:对单词形式学习无影响,对单词意义学习有相反影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Nov;77(11):2180-2198. doi: 10.1177/17470218231218990. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
3
Learning Spelling From Meaning.

本文引用的文献

1
Gaming experience affects the interpretation of ambiguous words.游戏体验影响对歧义词汇的解读。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243512. eCollection 2020.
2
Sleep-dependent consolidation in children with comprehension and vocabulary weaknesses: it'll be alright on the night?儿童在理解和词汇方面的薄弱环节在睡眠中得以巩固:那晚将安然无恙?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;61(10):1104-1115. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13253. Epub 2020 May 5.
3
Disambiguating the ambiguity disadvantage effect: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for semantic competition.
从意义中学习拼写。
Exp Psychol. 2023 May;70(3):145-154. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000587.
4
Diversity of narrative context disrupts the early stage of learning the meanings of novel words.叙述语境的多样性会扰乱学习新词意义的早期阶段。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2338-2350. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02316-z. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
5
The Role of Sleep in Learning New Meanings for Familiar Words through Stories.睡眠在通过故事学习熟悉单词新含义中的作用。
J Cogn. 2023 Jun 15;6(1):27. doi: 10.5334/joc.282. eCollection 2023.
6
Learning new words through reading: do robust spelling-sound mappings boost learning of word forms and meanings?通过阅读学习新单词:稳固的拼写-发音映射关系能促进单词形式和含义的学习吗?
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Dec 14;9(12):210555. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210555. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Vocabulary Learning During Reading: Benefits of Contextual Inferences Versus Retrieval Opportunities.阅读过程中的词汇学习:语境推理与检索机会的益处。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Apr;46(4):e13135. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13135.
消除歧义劣势效应:语义竞争的行为和电生理证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Sep;46(9):1682-1700. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000842. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
4
Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access.融入语义空间:一种以歧义为焦点的词义获取理论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Mar;15(2):411-427. doi: 10.1177/1745691619885860. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
5
Nurturing a lexical legacy: reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill.培育词汇遗产:阅读体验对单词阅读技能的发展至关重要。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2017 Jan 27;2:3. doi: 10.1038/s41539-017-0004-7. eCollection 2017.
6
Contextual priming of word meanings is stabilized over sleep.语境启动对词义的稳定作用可以在睡眠中实现。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:109-126. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
7
Learning new meanings for known words: Biphasic effects of prior knowledge.学习已知单词的新含义:先验知识的双相效应。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2017;32(5):637-649. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1252050. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
8
Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.听众和读者会跨模态归纳他们对词义的体验。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Oct;44(10):1533-1561. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000532. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Retuning of lexical-semantic representations: Repetition and spacing effects in word-meaning priming.词汇语义表征的重新调整:词义启动中的重复与间隔效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(7):1130-1150. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000507. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
10
Retrieval as a Fast Route to Memory Consolidation.作为记忆巩固快速途径的提取
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Aug;21(8):573-576. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 2.