• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词汇语义表征的重新调整:词义启动中的重复与间隔效应

Retuning of lexical-semantic representations: Repetition and spacing effects in word-meaning priming.

作者信息

Betts Hannah N, Gilbert Rebecca A, Cai Zhenguang G, Okedara Zainab B, Rodd Jennifer M

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(7):1130-1150. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000507. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000507
PMID:29283607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6012009/
Abstract

Current models of word-meaning access typically assume that lexical-semantic representations of ambiguous words (e.g., 'bark of the dog/tree') reach a relatively stable state in adulthood, with only the relative frequencies of meanings and immediate sentence context determining meaning preference. However, recent experience also affects interpretation: recently encountered word-meanings become more readily available (Rodd et al., 2016, 2013). Here, 3 experiments investigated how multiple encounters with word-meanings influence the subsequent interpretation of these ambiguous words. Participants heard ambiguous words contextually-disambiguated towards a particular meaning and, after a 20- to 30-min delay, interpretations of the words were tested in isolation. We replicate the finding that 1 encounter with an ambiguous word biased the later interpretation of this word towards the primed meaning for both subordinate (Experiments 1, 2, 3) and dominant meanings (Experiment 1). In addition, for the first time, we show cumulative effects of multiple repetitions of both the same and different meanings. The effect of a single subordinate exposure persisted after a subsequent encounter with the dominant meaning, compared to a dominant exposure alone (Experiment 1). Furthermore, 3 subordinate word-meaning repetitions provided an additional boost to priming compared to 1, although only when their presentation was spaced (Experiments 2, 3); massed repetitions provided no such boost (Experiments 1, 3). These findings indicate that comprehension is guided by the collective effect of multiple recently activated meanings and that the spacing of these activations is key to producing lasting updates to the lexical-semantic network. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

当前的词义通达模型通常假定,多义词(如“狗叫/树皮”)的词汇语义表征在成年期会达到相对稳定的状态,只有词义的相对频率和直接的句子语境决定意义偏好。然而,近期的经历也会影响语义理解:最近遇到的词义会更容易被提取(罗德等人,2016年、2013年)。在此,我们进行了3项实验,研究多次接触词义如何影响对这些多义词的后续理解。参与者听到在特定语境中消除歧义的多义词,在间隔20到30分钟后,对这些词的理解进行单独测试。我们重复了这一发现,即对于从属意义(实验1、2、3)和主导意义(实验1),接触一次多义词会使该词后来的理解偏向于启动的意义。此外,我们首次展示了相同和不同意义多次重复的累积效应。与仅接触主导意义相比,在随后接触主导意义后,单次接触从属意义的效应仍然存在(实验1)。此外,与一次接触相比,3次重复从属词义会对启动效应有额外的促进作用,不过只有在它们的呈现是间隔的情况下才会如此(实验2、3);集中重复则没有这种促进作用(实验1、3)。这些发现表明,理解是由多个最近激活的意义的集体效应引导的,并且这些激活的间隔是对词汇语义网络产生持久更新的关键。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/26236d3aa352/xlm_44_7_1130_fig6a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/39903150dbf3/xlm_44_7_1130_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/f92feb77186e/xlm_44_7_1130_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/a319f3d02756/xlm_44_7_1130_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/6adb7afcdbaa/xlm_44_7_1130_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/4e639440b28d/xlm_44_7_1130_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/26236d3aa352/xlm_44_7_1130_fig6a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/39903150dbf3/xlm_44_7_1130_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/f92feb77186e/xlm_44_7_1130_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/a319f3d02756/xlm_44_7_1130_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/6adb7afcdbaa/xlm_44_7_1130_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/4e639440b28d/xlm_44_7_1130_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7faf/6012009/26236d3aa352/xlm_44_7_1130_fig6a.jpg

相似文献

1
Retuning of lexical-semantic representations: Repetition and spacing effects in word-meaning priming.词汇语义表征的重新调整:词义启动中的重复与间隔效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(7):1130-1150. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000507. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
2
Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.听众和读者会跨模态归纳他们对词义的体验。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Oct;44(10):1533-1561. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000532. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
Learning about the meanings of ambiguous words: evidence from a word-meaning priming paradigm with short narratives.从带有简短叙述的词义启动范式看歧义词的词义学习
PeerJ. 2022 Oct 19;10:e14070. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14070. eCollection 2022.
4
Word-meaning priming extends beyond homonyms.词意启动不仅限于同形异义词。
Cognition. 2022 Sep;226:105175. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105175. Epub 2022 May 27.
5
Morpho-semantic processing in word recognition: evidence from balanced and biased ambiguous morphemes.词汇形态语义加工在单词识别中的作用:来自平衡和偏向歧义语素的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1990-2001. doi: 10.1037/a0033701. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
6
Semantically convergent and semantically divergent priming in the cerebral hemispheres: lexical decision and semantic judgment.大脑半球中的语义趋同和语义发散启动:词汇判断与语义判断
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Oct;17(3):585-97. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00172-1.
7
Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access.融入语义空间:一种以歧义为焦点的词义获取理论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Mar;15(2):411-427. doi: 10.1177/1745691619885860. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
8
Event-related potential evidence for the early activation of literal meaning during comprehension of conventional lexical metaphors.事件相关电位证据表明,在理解常规词汇隐喻时,字面意义会被早期激活。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1730-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.027. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
9
Morphosemantic activation of opaque Chinese words in sentence comprehension.句子理解中不透明汉语词汇的形态语义激活
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0236697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236697. eCollection 2020.
10
Semantic access to ambiguous word roots cannot be stopped by affixation-Not even in sentence contexts: Evidence from eye-tracking and the maze task.词缀法无法阻止对多义词词根的语义通达——即使在句子语境中也不行:来自眼动追踪和迷宫任务的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Mar;51(3):435-459. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001378. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
EPS mid-career prize: An integrated framework for the learning, recognition and interpretation of words.EPS 中期职业奖:用于单词学习、识别和解释的综合框架。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Dec;77(12):2365-2384. doi: 10.1177/17470218241284289. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
2
Word association task responses prime associations in subsequent trials.词语联想任务的反应会在后续试验中启动联想。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Mar;78(3):566-574. doi: 10.1177/17470218241239321. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
3
Causal Contributions of the Domain-General (Multiple Demand) and the Language-Selective Brain Networks to Perceptual and Semantic Challenges in Speech Comprehension.

本文引用的文献

1
Accent modulates access to word meaning: Evidence for a speaker-model account of spoken word recognition.口音调节对词义的获取:支持口语单词识别的说话者模型解释的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2017 Nov;98:73-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
2
Perturbation of old knowledge precedes integration of new knowledge.旧知识的扰动先于新知识的整合。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 May;99:270-278. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
3
Baseball fans don't like lumpy batters: Influence of domain knowledge on the access of subordinate meanings.
通用领域(多重需求)和语言选择性脑网络对言语理解中感知和语义挑战的因果贡献。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Dec 16;3(4):665-698. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00081. eCollection 2022.
4
Learning new words through reading: do robust spelling-sound mappings boost learning of word forms and meanings?通过阅读学习新单词:稳固的拼写-发音映射关系能促进单词形式和含义的学习吗?
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Dec 14;9(12):210555. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210555. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Learning about the meanings of ambiguous words: evidence from a word-meaning priming paradigm with short narratives.从带有简短叙述的词义启动范式看歧义词的词义学习
PeerJ. 2022 Oct 19;10:e14070. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14070. eCollection 2022.
6
Dominance Norms and Data for Spoken Ambiguous Words in British English.英式英语中口语歧义词汇的显性规范与数据
J Cogn. 2022 Jan 6;5(1):4. doi: 10.5334/joc.194. eCollection 2022.
7
Learning new word meanings from story reading: the benefit of immediate testing.通过故事阅读学习新单词含义:即时测试的益处。
PeerJ. 2021 Aug 10;9:e11693. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11693. eCollection 2021.
8
Gaming experience affects the interpretation of ambiguous words.游戏体验影响对歧义词汇的解读。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243512. eCollection 2020.
9
Towards a distributed connectionist account of cognates and interlingual homographs: evidence from semantic relatedness tasks.走向同源词和跨语言同形异义词的分布式联结主义解释:来自语义相关性任务的证据
PeerJ. 2019 May 16;7:e6725. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6725. eCollection 2019.
10
Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.听众和读者会跨模态归纳他们对词义的体验。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Oct;44(10):1533-1561. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000532. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
棒球迷不喜欢身材凹凸不平的击球手:领域知识对下位意义通达的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Nov 8:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1251470.
4
The N400 elicited by homonyms in puns: Two primes are not better than one.双关语中同形同音异义词引发的N400:两个启动刺激并不比一个更好。
Psychophysiology. 2016 Dec;53(12):1799-1810. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12762. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
5
SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English.SUBTLEX-UK:一个全新且经过改进的英式英语词汇频率数据库。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1176-90. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
6
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
7
Repetition and practice effects in a lexical decision task.在词汇判断任务中的重复和练习效应。
Mem Cognit. 1974 Mar;2(2):337-9. doi: 10.3758/BF03209005.
8
Eye Movements while Reading Biased Homographs: Effects of Prior Encounter and Biasing Context on Reducing the Subordinate Bias Effect.阅读有偏向的同形异义词时的眼动:先前接触和偏向语境对减少从属偏向效应的影响。
J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2013 Jan 1;25(6):665-681. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.806513.
9
Revisiting effects of contextual strength on the subordinate bias effect: evidence from eye movements.重新审视语境强度对从属偏见效应的影响:来自眼动的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Nov;41(8):1172-84. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0328-3.
10
Repetition Priming and Repetition Suppression: A Case for Enhanced Efficiency Through Neural Synchronization.重复启动与重复抑制:通过神经同步提高效率的实例
Cogn Neurosci. 2012;3(3-4):227-237. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2012.670617. Epub 2012 Mar 1.